What's new

Player Watch: Gareth Bale - Retires

doctor stefan Freud

the tired tread of sad biology
Sep 2, 2013
15,170
72,170
I keep insisting this is never going to happen. The financials are too complex. Then, last night, pissed up and bored, I crunched the financials. Bare with me now:

Bale has two and a half years left on his contract. He is paid 600,000 pound/euros (too pissed to check) a week, which after tax comes to approximately 350,000 pounds.

Bale earns 350,000 a week. So he stands to receive 45.5 million pounds in that time.

600,000 x 130 (weeks) = 78 million pounds

Bale earns 350,000 a week. So he stands to receive 45.5 million pounds in that time. But Real have to fork out 78 million.

That’s a lot of money for a player they don’t want.

They might as well give him away in the hope they clear the 78 million it’s going to cost them to keep him there.

So, imagine we strike a deal where we take Bale gratis.

We pay him the same as Kane: approximately 200,000 a week for two and a half years.

200,000 x 130 = 26 million.

Then we pay Bale 20-25 million signing on fee. After tax, he might be down some, but he’s back in the game at a club he has mutual affection for with a manager he’s thrived under. Maybe it could happen?

But probably not
 

tiger666

Large Member
Jan 4, 2005
27,978
82,216
I keep insisting this is never going to happen. The financials are too complex. Then, last night, pissed up and bored, I crunched the financials. Bare with me now:

Bale has two and a half years left on his contract. He is paid 600,000 pound/euros (too pissed to check) a week, which after tax comes to approximately 350,000 pounds.

Bale earns 350,000 a week. So he stands to receive 45.5 million pounds in that time.

600,000 x 130 (weeks) = 78 million pounds

Bale earns 350,000 a week. So he stands to receive 45.5 million pounds in that time. But Real have to fork out 78 million.

That’s a lot of money for a player they don’t want.

They might as well give him away in the hope they clear the 78 million it’s going to cost them to keep him there.

So, imagine we strike a deal where we take Bale gratis.

We pay him the same as Kane: approximately 200,000 a week for two and a half years.

200,000 x 130 = 26 million.

Then we pay Bale 20-25 million signing on fee. After tax, he might be down some, but he’s back in the game at a club he has mutual affection for with a manager he’s thrived under. Maybe it could happen?

But probably not

Have you sent this over to our dearly beloved leader yet?
 

Yiddo1982

Well-Known Member
Jul 4, 2006
2,622
6,394
I keep insisting this is never going to happen. The financials are too complex. Then, last night, pissed up and bored, I crunched the financials. Bare with me now:

Bale has two and a half years left on his contract. He is paid 600,000 pound/euros (too pissed to check) a week, which after tax comes to approximately 350,000 pounds.

Bale earns 350,000 a week. So he stands to receive 45.5 million pounds in that time.

600,000 x 130 (weeks) = 78 million pounds

Bale earns 350,000 a week. So he stands to receive 45.5 million pounds in that time. But Real have to fork out 78 million.

That’s a lot of money for a player they don’t want.

They might as well give him away in the hope they clear the 78 million it’s going to cost them to keep him there.

So, imagine we strike a deal where we take Bale gratis.

We pay him the same as Kane: approximately 200,000 a week for two and a half years.

200,000 x 130 = 26 million.

Then we pay Bale 20-25 million signing on fee. After tax, he might be down some, but he’s back in the game at a club he has mutual affection for with a manager he’s thrived under. Maybe it could happen?

But probably not

Quick bit of advice - if you ever set up your own business, hire an accountant.
 

littlewilly

Well-Known Member
May 28, 2013
1,680
5,231
I keep insisting this is never going to happen. The financials are too complex. Then, last night, pissed up and bored, I crunched the financials. Bare with me now:

Bale has two and a half years left on his contract. He is paid 600,000 pound/euros (too pissed to check) a week, which after tax comes to approximately 350,000 pounds.

Bale earns 350,000 a week. So he stands to receive 45.5 million pounds in that time.

600,000 x 130 (weeks) = 78 million pounds

Bale earns 350,000 a week. So he stands to receive 45.5 million pounds in that time. But Real have to fork out 78 million.

That’s a lot of money for a player they don’t want.

They might as well give him away in the hope they clear the 78 million it’s going to cost them to keep him there.

So, imagine we strike a deal where we take Bale gratis.

We pay him the same as Kane: approximately 200,000 a week for two and a half years.

200,000 x 130 = 26 million.

Then we pay Bale 20-25 million signing on fee. After tax, he might be down some, but he’s back in the game at a club he has mutual affection for with a manager he’s thrived under. Maybe it could happen?

But probably not
Interesting, thanks. Wish you could sort your bares from your bears though - a repetitive error!
 

doctor stefan Freud

the tired tread of sad biology
Sep 2, 2013
15,170
72,170
Have you sent this over to our dearly beloved leader yet?
Indeed. Got this response just this morning.

F6E99367-6196-4D32-B05D-22980AB55678.jpeg
 

Metalhead

But that's a debate for another thread.....
Nov 24, 2013
25,410
38,425
They probably are the focus, but that almost means nothing. It's radio silence.

Season is a write off.
Definitely - it's just about (hopefully) seeing the club progress - there are small signs of it happening. Jose seems quite relaxed in the press conferences - even dealing with the continuing Rose and Eriksen questions in a measured way.
 
D

Deleted member 27995

Definitely - it's just about (hopefully) seeing the club progress - there are small signs of it happening. Jose seems quite relaxed in the press conferences - even dealing with the continuing Rose and Eriksen questions in a measured way.
I'll believe it when I see it after Friday night.
 

mansfield

Member
Jun 14, 2007
99
55
Oh it's clearly on! :whistle:

Those who say it doesn't fit with the clubs recruitment policy are way off as it strengthens our vision of building the most injury-prone team in world.
 

geordiespur

Well-Known Member
Aug 23, 2010
318
912
ITKs are regarded well and in high esteem by a lot of people and rightly so. They share info about the club we otherwise wouldn't get.

My issue is when they start to use their standing to get their own feelings and opinion across too and people buy into it as if its not opinion but fact.

That's what it feels like Gards does to me. He clearly has issues with the club or with Levy.

im pretty sure his twitter account is for his own personal use and not exclusively for ITK so if he wants to say how he feels, then that’s up to him and not for you to judge.
 

aliyid

Well-Known Member
Dec 28, 2004
7,003
20,130
Gards generally always delivers negative ITK doesnt he? I cant remember the last time he said anything positive about the club.

Not ITK bashing here by the way just stating a fact.
There’s a fine line between “negative ITK” and “accurate ITK”.
 
Top