- Jan 31, 2005
- 15,280
- 9,893
I think you misunderstoof me It wasnt a statement, it was more like a question.
To reword it. Im an accumulator newbie, so I was asking if you felt its better / easier to win money by sticking larger sums on a few dead certs or by putting smaller amounts on more matches with some upsets in there to increase your odds; because from what ive seen in this thread, the people that tend to be winning are those that are putting between £15 - £50 quid on 4 or 5 teams (favourites) to win there games. Whereas ive been putting quids here and there on over 10 matches (with a few upsets) and have yet to win a accumulator.
I guess its down to personal preference, but does anyone here have a particularly good record, and a saferproof way of playing and winning on accumulators?
Thats what I do Racky, and I have quite a good record by doing it that way. But nothing is a cert and it is down to opinions aswell.
Houdini is going for the Sir Bill Nick way of ACCAS by aiming high and failing, so there is a case for both.