tiger666
Large Member
- Jan 4, 2005
- 27,978
- 82,216
So by that argument you can't sack a manager unless all the clubs below have sacked theirs?
It's all over
- Thread starter Mullers
- Start date
So by that argument you can't sack a manager unless all the clubs below have sacked theirs?
- Thread starter
- #342
I'm being honest.
tiger666
Large Member
- Jan 4, 2005
- 27,978
- 82,216
You're being pessimistic.
TheSecretNonFootballer
Well-Known Member
- Oct 31, 2013
- 1,147
- 1,433
Doesn't make it an invalid opinion though, does it?
- Thread starter
- #345
You sacked him in September which is much worse.
Ribble
Well-Known Member
- Apr 13, 2011
- 3,537
- 4,828
I think it would have certainly been interesting, FSG are very astute in regards to business and not afraid of selling big names, but at the same time I don't think they'd sell over Rodgers' head had he wanted to keep Suarez. That said Rodgers might have seen that much money as an opportunity to do exactly what they did with Torres previously and replace 1 with 2, indeed whilst Suarez was suspended the talk was of shifting the focus away from him and bring in more team play.
tiger666
Large Member
- Jan 4, 2005
- 27,978
- 82,216
No of course not.
TheSecretNonFootballer
Well-Known Member
- Oct 31, 2013
- 1,147
- 1,433
Sadly all we have now is the ifs, perhaps, maybes etc. We'll never know and can only speculate.
- Thread starter
- #349
Nope just saying we are two points above one of the top four regulars, so the decision to get rid was hasty.
tiger666
Large Member
- Jan 4, 2005
- 27,978
- 82,216
What if he quit?
- Thread starter
- #351
Depends on what his reasons were if he did quit. If a boss makes it harder and harder for you to do your job, I don't blame a person for quitting.
tiger666
Large Member
- Jan 4, 2005
- 27,978
- 82,216
So basically no matter what occurred, AVB was right.
- Thread starter
- #354
Nope I didn't say that did I. I'm AVB supporter but I certainly criticize him where it's warranted, I wish you and others who support Levy would do the same.
- Thread starter
- #355
60 million was the figure being talked about not 85 million.
parklane1
Well-Known Member
- May 4, 2012
- 4,390
- 4,054
Reguardless, i have seen posts on here and elsewhere bemoaning that Levy sold Bale but L'pool kept Suarez ( in other words l'pool were right Levy was wrong) its bollocks, if Madrid had offered the same money he would have gone like a shot and L'pool would have let him.
- Thread starter
- #357
Don't just brush it off dude there is a big difference between 60 million and 85-90 million.
parklane1
Well-Known Member
- May 4, 2012
- 4,390
- 4,054
I am brushing nothing up,he would have gone and those who say he would not ( and they have been a few) are living in cuckoo land.
Let me ask you a simple question, do you think Levy would have sold Bale for 60 million?
CowInAComa
Well-Known Member
- Aug 31, 2012
- 7,293
- 18,237
i reckon we would be a few hidings and a few points better off if i had that power.
- Thread starter
- #360
Well you are because the figure being talked about is 60 million and not 85.
Yes Levy would have sold for 60 million but Perez was desperate to have a trophy wife to parade in front of his own fans. Wait until next year and thats another year of Bale's contract going down.
