parklane1
Well-Known Member
- May 4, 2012
- 4,390
- 4,054
Well we disagree.
It's all over
- Thread starter Mullers
- Start date
Well we disagree.
yido_number1
He'll always be magic
- Jun 8, 2004
- 8,692
- 16,889
No but surely United expect more than us and are prepared to give Moyes time...
tiger666
Large Member
- Jan 4, 2005
- 27,978
- 82,216
Well they gave him a 6 year contract 6 months ago. A bit different imo.
- Aug 9, 2008
- 4,911
- 8,416
tired of all the negativity, whats done is done, lets just look forward and sort it.
Bus-Conductor
SC Supporter
- Oct 19, 2004
- 39,837
- 50,713
arsenal bid GBP 40,000,001 thinking, wrongly, it would trigger a release clause. They didn't bid any more.
Last edited:
They wouldn't have sold in Summer gone full stop, it'd have been Jan or Summer 2014 at the earliest. Thats guaranteed. See the LFC thread if you're interested in why I am stating this.
Graysonti
Well-Known Member
- May 8, 2011
- 3,904
- 5,823
Rubbish mate, he wanted out and even said it.
If RM had put the intensity into signing Suarez he would be in Spain now.
Time will tell if he stays and whether that contract repays itself. Football is very fickle and your one injury from losing the players current ability.
Of course he would have gone if RM had wanted him, that's obvious! Fending of Arsenal doesn't even compare with fighting of RM, to say otherwise is mind blowing lay stupid!
parklane1
Well-Known Member
- May 4, 2012
- 4,390
- 4,054
So you are telling me that if Madrid ( or any other club) had offered 85 million they would not have sold him? Bollocks.
Last edited:
Bobbins
SC's 14th Sexiest Male 2008
- May 5, 2005
- 21,609
- 45,208
Ok mullers your Levy-bashing has now reached the point where you're literally just making stuff up.
You have no evidence for anything you're saying here, and both your Bale and Suarez points are completely wrong.
- Thread starter
- #371
I'm speculating about what I think Levy would have done, it's not really bashing as such. I don't there is much doubt that Perez wanted desperately to parade some star signing and Bale was that person. If it was up to Ancelotti he would have used that 90 million for something else.
Levy talks the talk but he doesn't walk the walk, he will go on about a player not being sold at any price yada yada in the end he will always sell. Modric was sold for what? 33 million in 2012. Not really far fetched to believe that he wouldn't sell for 60 million, if Perez wasn't so desperate.
Sum Monsterism
Looking for an anecdote
- Jun 12, 2012
- 5,311
- 10,697
I dunno what you're basing this on. It's just supposition; unless secretly you're either a) Carlo's assistant or b) psychic
- Thread starter
- #373
In this case it is just supposition but I am psychic anyway.
Sum Monsterism
Looking for an anecdote
- Jun 12, 2012
- 5,311
- 10,697
NEVILLEB
Well-Known Member
- Nov 6, 2006
- 6,769
- 6,397
I'm pretty sure this club could:
Yes, that one in particular might do the job.
Sum Monsterism
Looking for an anecdote
- Jun 12, 2012
- 5,311
- 10,697
Handy that it's proving a bugger to wrap, otherwise I wouldn't have been able to take a picture of it to illustrate my point...
yido_number1
He'll always be magic
- Jun 8, 2004
- 8,692
- 16,889
If moyes had a better win percentage than any other utd boss and got sacked would you say the same? we have the second best away record in the league to Arsenal, says a lot about the atmosphere at home games these days...
DogsOfWar
Well-Known Member
- Jan 12, 2005
- 2,303
- 3,644
For me our whole strategy depends on the stadium. If the building of it goes ahead regardless of our current turnover situation then it's not a problem.
But, if the build was relying on 3 or 4 years CL football or a £100million naming rights which means it doesn't go ahead I would be disappointed as the Bale money could have allowed us to press on regardless.
If the stadium is still a goer then investing the Bale money in the squad isn't an issue, whether it proves successful in the future or not, as the club is still moving forward.
But, if the build was relying on 3 or 4 years CL football or a £100million naming rights which means it doesn't go ahead I would be disappointed as the Bale money could have allowed us to press on regardless.
If the stadium is still a goer then investing the Bale money in the squad isn't an issue, whether it proves successful in the future or not, as the club is still moving forward.
