only1waddle
Well-Known Member
- Jun 18, 2012
- 8,256
- 12,593
Blatter will just order a couple more bottles of bubbly off the menu, the self appointed ****
Last edited:
Man City offered a settlement by UEFA.
- Thread starter THFCSPURS19
- Start date
Blatter will just order a couple more bottles of bubbly off the menu, the self appointed ****
nightgoat
Well-Known Member
- Sep 12, 2005
- 24,604
- 21,898
True, but they've had injuries to key players all throughout this season whilst only really using 21 players in the CL.
only1waddle
Well-Known Member
- Jun 18, 2012
- 8,256
- 12,593
I suppose they don't really notice it with strength in depth.
TheAmerican
Well-Known Member
- Aug 30, 2012
- 6,913
- 18,761
I have the feeling that this will all be dramatically reduced after that non-negotiable panel reviews it. UEFA doesn't seem to have a spine.
Huddlestone22
Tom Huddlestone
- Mar 1, 2007
- 2,042
- 2,463
I don't get the punishment.
They're getting into trouble for spending money, so the way to redeem themselves is to spend more money?
They're getting into trouble for spending money, so the way to redeem themselves is to spend more money?
DanielCHillier
Well-Known Member
- Feb 26, 2014
- 2,036
- 4,029
How do man utd plan to spend £200m and remain within the FFP rules?
XSuicideBunnyX
FM Champion 2015
- Aug 3, 2013
- 839
- 1,191
By setting 50 million aside to pay off UEFA, of course.
Harry Barber
Well-Known Member
- May 6, 2013
- 513
- 1,107
Yes.
beats1
Well-Known Member
- Feb 22, 2010
- 30,041
- 29,641
Unfortunately fine wont count but with any rule change its unlikely it the harshest penalties are given out first, though UEFA wasn't too afraid of dishing it out last year of pre-existing rules.Funny if they fall foul of next season's FFP rules due to this fine
Now Uefa want the tens to prove they are making cuts so if a team purposely breaks FFP to gain advantage that will result in a ban, i.e. City cutting costs down and down, find themselves in 6th then spending shit load to get in 1st again.
beats1
Well-Known Member
- Feb 22, 2010
- 30,041
- 29,641
They make more revenue then any other team and next season they have £53million shirt deal with Chevrolet come in to effect. Interestingly the director who did the deal got sacked the day after he presented the deal to his co workers
I doubt they will spend £200million though
Casparian
Living in a Lillywhite Dreamland.
- Jul 13, 2008
- 2,142
- 4,247
UEFA have clarified that Platini's statement a week or so ago was misquoted.He specifically said that he had no influence on decisions,the working bodies are independent of UEFA.He could also do with keeping his trap shut.
The position at present is that the "Investigative Chamber" (the lower-tier one) has found a number of clubs,of which Man City and PSG are two,guilty of rule breaches.They are now offered a "plea bargain" which they can either accept or reject.
If they reject it,it gets passed to the "Adjudicating Chamber" who can either enforce the previous verdict or impose a tougher penalty.The only appeal against this is to the Court of Arbitration in Sport who again can either uphold or reject the verdict.
Also at any time any other club directly affected by the verdict can also appeal against it
For clarification or even just a polite reminder here are the sanctions available...
http://www.financialfairplay.co.uk/
Not sure if it is common knowledge or not but nobody will be surprised to know or learn that PSG sponsor deal was allegedly, deemed twice what Fifa/Uefa deem as fair play and apparently from now on only half of whatever that deal was will be included as relevant income in future check's.
Last edited:
Geyzer Soze
Fearlessly the idiot faced the crowd
- Aug 16, 2010
- 26,056
- 63,363
About 1% of his wealth. Or to put it another way approx 2 months of his interest
It's kinda chicken feed to him I reckon
spurs9
Well-Known Member
- Aug 31, 2012
- 11,916
- 34,532
I said a few months ago, they will only ban the clubs with no money and who don't generate much in the way of viewing figures, the rest will bet fines. UEFA/FIFA are only interested in making money not promoting fairness.
Because all the latest losses have been written off and turned to equity by FSG and the released financial details are 18 months out of date.
We have increased our revenues MASSIVELY since the last accounts published through hugely increased commercial and sponsorship deals, increased TV money, increased prize money for finishing 2nd and the CL money that will be coming in for definite as were into the Group stages guaranteed. (http://www.deloitte.com/view/en_GB/.../5aa11261e7c5c310VgnVCM3000003456f70aRCRD.htm)
More importantly I thought it seemed pretty fair and clear that UEFA cannot penalise a Club that haven't taken part in a UEFA sanctioned competition in the time period that they examine. Should the PL penalise QPR under their new FFP laws for the state they're in despite being in the Championship this year?
Liverpool have done nothing wrong UEFA FFP wise so don't deserve any punishment as much as I'm sure that angers and upsets you but thats the way it is. However, I may be able to satisfy your bad feelings towards my club by informing you that we may be in trouble when it comes to the EPL's own version of FFP (although nowhere near in as much shit as City).
You don't need to worry about our finances. FSG are very fiscally sound and won't put the club in debt or jeopardy like the last lot did. Its bollocks about Barkley but we do have substantial funds for this Summer but thats only the case because FSG and our MD say were in a healthy position financially so can afford to strengthen the depth of the squad. If FSG felt we couldn't afford it, we wouldn't spend it. Simple as that really.
Its nice that you take such a keen interest in my club despite being a Spurs fan Mr Goat. Long may it continue.
beats1
Well-Known Member
- Feb 22, 2010
- 30,041
- 29,641
Er mate you got this one wrong, it wasn't fair and clear that a club haven't taken part in a UEFA sanctioned doesn't get penalised. As in the future they may get penalised if they break even if they aren't in a uefa competition. The reason for not sanctioning the teams outside of the Uefa competitions was because them not applying for a licence meant that the lawyers and politicians doing the audits did have the accounts in time for punishment.
Uefa will be trying to work with the leagues to get this information quick enough in the future.
Daniel Geey, who is the Sports Lawyer and FFP expert says no. Follow him on twitter if anyone is interested in all this FFP stuff. he writes and speaks about it regularly and really knows his stuff and is great at explaining it and making it easy to understand it all.
They won't be in a UEFA sanctioned club competition next season so can spend whatever they want this Summer and next January and it makes zero difference to FFP.
