- Aug 28, 2010
- 5,003
- 6,634
It's not that bad mate!! It's pretty fucking new.For anyone who has been to MK Dons' stadium you will all share the opinion that it is a complete shithole.
It's not that bad mate!! It's pretty fucking new.For anyone who has been to MK Dons' stadium you will all share the opinion that it is a complete shithole.
Yes. And I'm sure the player won't get jetlaged twice a week of all the travelling. Should be great for the team and our results!
Not sure tbh. Craven Cottage or Selhurst Park possibly? They'd be the only viable options surely.Hope the latest ITK isn't true. Milton fucking Keynes! Complete joke.
We're a London club. You telling me there isn't a single London club we could share with for 2 years? I'd rather play at the Emirates.
Sincerely hope the info about ST holders getting a sabbatical and not going to the back of the queue afterwards is true, otherwise it's an utter disgrace.
Hope the latest ITK isn't true. Milton fucking Keynes! Complete joke.
We're a London club. You telling me there isn't a single London club we could share with for 2 years? I'd rather play at the Emirates.
Sincerely hope the info about ST holders getting a sabbatical and not going to the back of the queue afterwards is true, otherwise it's an utter disgrace.
Not sure tbh. Craven Cottage or Selhurst Park possibly? They'd be the only viable options surely.
not kept upto date on the our options whilst the lane is re-built - but is Wembley totally off the radar?
Surely a better bet than MK, and given the cpacity - the extra rental should be covered by the higher gates?
Obviously we have to go somewhere with as high a capacity as possible as well as the capability to comply with whatever regulations there might be concerning the staging of PL and European fixtures. Plus it'd have to satisfy the cozzers/health and safety. Well, that's a guess, but it wouldn't surprise me if it were a consideration.
Having had a look at the options (For me Arsenal, Chelsea and West Ham aren't options for various reasons) there's MK (30k capacity), Charlton (27k), Palace (26k) and Fulham (25k)*.
And my personal favourite is……..
Twickenham! (82k) But I have no idea as to wether or not the playing surface would be suitable. Anyway, that'll never happen
*Source Wiki so pinch of salt
Obviously we have to go somewhere with as high a capacity as possible as well as the capability to comply with whatever regulations there might be concerning the staging of PL and European fixtures. Plus it'd have to satisfy the cozzers/health and safety. Well, that's a guess, but it wouldn't surprise me if it were a consideration.
Having had a look at the options (For me Arsenal, Chelsea and West Ham aren't options for various reasons) there's MK (30k capacity), Charlton (27k), Palace (26k) and Fulham (25k)*.
And my personal favourite is……..
Twickenham! (82k) But I have no idea as to wether or not the playing surface would be suitable. Anyway, that'll never happen
*Source Wiki so pinch of salt
The Olympic Stadium probably could have been an option if it wasn't for all of that spying court case nonsense over itThere was a Standard report back in July (posted in the Stadium thread) that Wembley, the Amex and Portman Road were also possibilities. It also mentioned the Olympic Stadium, but I really can't see that happening.
No No NoWe're a London club. You telling me there isn't a single London club we could share with for 2 years? I'd rather play at the Emirates.
That is both the best and the worst idea everyWhy don't we play our games abroad in the US, be the first PL club to play official PL games in the states.
Build our fanbase up in the states.