What's new

What our opponents' fans are saying

Status
Not open for further replies.

Disconosebleed

Well-Known Member
Dec 22, 2005
2,553
2,569
"Intention" in the rules is actually interpreted as intention/lack of intention in avoiding handball. You don't have to demonstrate that the handball was unintentional, you must demonstrate that you intentionally acted to avoid the handball. Which actually are two different things. So, if you don't show enough intention to avoid the ball with your hand, it's handball. This is to avoid that players arbitrage when their hands are already placed unnaturally. Funny, huh?

Where have you got this idea from? The relevant passage from the FA's rules of governance:

A direct free kick is also awarded to the opposing team if a player commits any of the following three offences:



    • handles the ball deliberately (except for the goalkeeper within his own penalty area)
A penalty kick is awarded if any of the above ten offences is committed by a player inside his own penalty area, irrespective of the position of the ball, provided it is in play.

http://www.thefa.com/football-rules...ball-11-11/law-12---fouls-and-misconduct.aspx

There is no mention of this weird new alternative meaning of 'intent' you're proposing which bears no relation to intent whatsoever.

The only issue with regard to the Sterling handball is whether he intented it in the traditional sense ie. meant to do it, rather than didn't try not to do it. And he clearly didn't intend to handle it. It was a bad decision, but one that went our way. Isn't that enough? We'd all be raging if it went against us, so it's stupid and hypocritical to try and justify it just because it went our way.
 

UpTownSpur

Says it like it is
Dec 31, 2014
2,266
4,362
Alli's yellow card against Watford away was not a yellow card but Capoue feigning injury and the Watford players' reaction "won" the yellow card for them - they'd been hoping for a red.

It was Rose's extreme reaction that convinced Clattenburg it had hit Sterling's hand and it was a penalty - Rose had the best view after all. It was the same with Leicester in the cup.
 

TottenhamMattSpur

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
10,925
16,007
Don't mind him personally, but I get what you're saying. I have similar feelings when we beat West Ham and I think of Russell Brand and James Corden.
Seriously? That's the worst you can think of?

I see your Russell Brand and James Corden and I raise you Danny Dyer and Ray Winstone
 

adamsky

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2006
1,689
4,489
Is simple for me. If sterling had jumped as he did and the ball directly hit his arm then I don't think he can complain about it being a penalty, as if you jump like that you are taking the risk. However, on this occasion the ball primarily hit his back and then touched his arm, so I think it shouldn't have been given.

Happy it was though.
 

BehindEnemyLines

Twisting a Melon with the Rev. Black Grape
Apr 13, 2006
4,667
13,560
Out of its range? They're submarines not planes. Gonna need sonar at this rate...
Alli's yellow card against Watford away was not a yellow card but Capoue feigning injury and the Watford players' reaction "won" the yellow card for them - they'd been hoping for a red.

It was Rose's extreme reaction that convinced Clattenburg it had hit Sterling's hand and it was a penalty - Rose had the best view after all. It was the same with Leicester in the cup.
rose hits the first man so often with his crosses that I'm starting to think he's playing for handbags hand balls.
 

Sweech

Ruh Roh Ressegnon
Jun 27, 2013
6,752
16,378
Ehn, last year Naughton lunged for the ball, it hit his arm, and not only was the penalty given, but he was red carded. Did he mean to hit it with his arm? No, that's a natural movement to balance yourself when you lunge like that, but that shit happens.
 

night-watchman

SC Supporter
May 12, 2005
703
986
Saintsweb, on the possibility of Poch leaving Spurs:


"There's no evidence to suggest that Poch is any more disloyal than any comparable football manager so no idea where this "he'll be off like a shot" garbage is coming from....

Most of them are speaking quite a lot of sense to be fair.
 

spurs9

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
11,916
34,532
And then when we did qualify that Gooner tosspiece didn't take it seriously and we got knocked out by fucking Kaislerslauten.
Yeah, dropping your best (only good) attacking player for the second leg to protect a 1-0 lead is nor such a good idea.
 

thelak

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
2,191
7,039
Ehn, last year Naughton lunged for the ball, it hit his arm, and not only was the penalty given, but he was red carded. Did he mean to hit it with his arm? No, that's a natural movement to balance yourself when you lunge like that, but that shit happens.

Wow. Naughton played for Spurs last year. Feels like another lifetime ago we had guys like Naughton playing for us
 

Ausp

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2015
337
1,607
I think we will sneak it 2-1, we will take the lead, City will nick one back and then we will score in the final 10 mins to win.

Illuminati confirmed...

Seriously, you were right on the money. I was expecting us to do City in, but Pellegrini brought a bit of Mou tactics and I wasn't expecting the return of Kompany and Silva.

Good job. (y)
 

Mattspur

ENIC IN
Jan 7, 2004
4,889
7,273
I think I find us going over this discussion every other week.

"Intention" in the rules is actually interpreted as intention/lack of intention in avoiding handball. You don't have to demonstrate that the handball was unintentional, you must demonstrate that you intentionally acted to avoid the handball. Which actually are two different things. So, if you don't show enough intention to avoid the ball with your hand, it's handball. This is to avoid that players arbitrage when their hands are already placed unnaturally. Funny, huh?

I think you're making it up as you go along. Nowhere in the rules of the game does it mention the interpretation you stated.

@Luka Van der Bale and @Yid-ol if you guys want to get into football it's a good idea to learn the laws.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top