- Jun 18, 2011
- 6,427
- 17,122
To be honest I find it a little weird that Kane would go that far to claim the goal as his.
To be honest I find it a little weird that Kane would go that far to claim the goal as his.
It doesn't really bother me - he knows he touched it so he's using the most important person in his life to show how sure he is.To be honest I find it a little weird that Kane would go that far to claim the goal as his.
Indeed. Disgraceful comment. Sell. Build for the future.Bit extreme to swear in his daughter's life though...
Personally I would never swear on a loved ones lift even if I was certain of something as I'm superstitious like that.
Been reviewed and given to Eriksen.
Maybe they can appeal?
I hope kane gets it but tbh if you’re having to use a microscope to decide then really Eriksen should get benefit of doubt. Clear and obvious rule should apply.
If Kane gets awarded the goal and beats Salah by one goal for the golden boot there is going to be a march organised in Liverpool for the injustice, t shirts made, Twitter campaigns, protests and petitions
I’m assuming your joking right?This is absolutely pathetic. Losing respect for Harry here, tbh. Team is much more important then your goal tally and your main creator got the goal. Leave it the fuck alone. Jesus christ. Stop being so selfish.
Sadly people here seem to struggle to keep focus after reading a headline, more than 5/6 words is as much as most can handle before needing a nap.Everyone having a go at Kane, but the Torygraph article doesn't actually involve any quote from him at all about the prospect of an appeal - they've just researched themselves that it's possible, written an article about it, and re-published Kane's quote from immediately after the match:
"Have they? I swear on my daughter’s life that I touched the ball, but there’s nothing I can do. If they turn it around, they turn it around. If they take my word, they take my word.
It is what it is, the most important thing is that we won the game.”
As an immediate reaction that doesn't exactly sound unreasonable and he does point out that winning the game is what's important.
Gave a winner as it appears factual. Though I don't understand the need for, or relativity of, the political usage for the Telegraph. I assume it is that paper.Everyone having a go at Kane, but the Torygraph article doesn't actually involve any quote from him at all about the prospect of an appeal - they've just researched themselves that it's possible, written an article about it, and re-published Kane's quote from immediately after the match:
"Have they? I swear on my daughter’s life that I touched the ball, but there’s nothing I can do. If they turn it around, they turn it around. If they take my word, they take my word.
It is what it is, the most important thing is that we won the game.”
As an immediate reaction that doesn't exactly sound unreasonable and he does point out that winning the game is what's important.
Embarrassingly enough, it appears that's now autocorrecting for me Edited it now! ThanksGave a winner as it appears factual. Though I don't understand the need for, or relativity of, the political usage for the Telegraph. I assume it is that paper.
Relevance?Gave a winner as it appears factual. Though I don't understand the need for, or relativity of, the political usage for the Telegraph. I assume it is that paper.