- Jan 7, 2004
- 4,888
- 7,272
May as well close the thread now.if they’ve gone to the trouble of announcing a brand for the stadium name specific can’t see them announcing naming rights anytime soon.
You sure?
May as well close the thread now.if they’ve gone to the trouble of announcing a brand for the stadium name specific can’t see them announcing naming rights anytime soon.
May as well close the thread now.if they’ve gone to the trouble of announcing a brand for the stadium name specific can’t see them announcing naming rights anytime soon.
Is it fucking, Nike?! ?
That would be awesome imo.
Rather that than an airline or some shit.
Why is the stadium logo an upside down pixelated Nike tick?
I think @L.S.U.Yiddo was joking.People seem to be getting their shapes confused.
It's a stretch to think the veil on the stadium has any relevance to Nike's logo.
They're both curved in places. That's basically where the similarity ends.
What's more telling is the font they've used on the new branding. I.e. "Stadium" is done in the same font as the other Nike tie-ins posted above.
Interesting development, IMO.
Reminds me more of Visa, for some reasonPeople seem to be getting their shapes confused.
It's a stretch to think the veil on the stadium has any relevance to Nike's logo.
They're both curved in places. That's basically where the similarity ends.
What's more telling is the font they've used on the new branding. I.e. "Stadium" is done in the same font as the other Nike tie-ins posted above.
Interesting development, IMO.
I know PR but wouldn't we be in a better position to demand more from a naming rights sponsor with a couple of additional good players as the attaraction? The objective in my opinion is to use the players to attract a quality naming rights and therefore more PR, and not the other way as you intimated ie use PR to attract players.PR mate.
I know PR but wouldn't we be in a better position to demand more from a naming rights sponsor with a couple of additional good players as the attaraction? The objective in my opinion is to use the players to attract a quality naming rights and therefore more PR, and not the other way as you intimated ie use PR to attract players.
People seem to be getting their shapes confused.
It's a stretch to think the veil on the stadium has any relevance to Nike's logo.
They're both curved in places. That's basically where the similarity ends.
What's more telling is the font they've used on the new branding. I.e. "Stadium" is done in the same font as the other Nike tie-ins posted above.
Interesting development, IMO.
These are not real stadia but experiential installations by Nike at places like Milan, Tokyo, Berlin etc.You sure?
View attachment 39618
These are not real stadia but experiential installations by Nike at places like Milan, Tokyo, Berlin etc.
Nike Stadium is an experiential marketing platform of almost 10 years.
View attachment 39624
A bit puzzled myself by the design as it's identical with Nike's.
It's either:
a) Nike are moving into naming rights of large, signature stadia
b) Someone at Spurs' branding agency fucked up big time while noone was looking
These are not real stadia but experiential installations by Nike at places like Milan, Tokyo, Berlin etc.
Nike Stadium is an experiential marketing platform of almost 10 years.
View attachment 39624
A bit puzzled myself by the design as it's identical with Nike's.
It's either:
a) Nike are moving into naming rights of large, signature stadia
b) Someone at Spurs' branding agency fucked up big time while noone was looking
These are not real stadia but experiential installations by Nike at places like Milan, Tokyo, Berlin etc.
Nike Stadium is an experiential marketing platform of almost 10 years.