What's new

New Stadium Details And Discussions

coys200

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2017
8,436
17,403
I think you know what you're doing.

Purely highlighting something I think is odd. Actually just saw the first design did have the name, so wonder why they then ditched it. The club has made a big deal about retaining tradition. There has always been the club name outside the stadium. Why on earth would I come hear to troll the stadium. Anyone that follows me on twitter knows how positive I am about it. People bring up concerns constantly on ssc and have mature debate about it. But as soon as you bring up a concern here you get shot down for being a troll. It’s pretty weird tbh.
 

Lighty64

I believe
Aug 24, 2010
10,400
12,476
Purely highlighting something I think is odd. Actually just saw the first design did have the name, so wonder why they then ditched it. The club has made a big deal about retaining tradition. There has always been the club name outside the stadium. Why on earth would I come hear to troll the stadium. Anyone that follows me on twitter knows how positive I am about it. People bring up concerns constantly on ssc and have mature debate about it. But as soon as you bring up a concern here you get shot down for being a troll. It’s pretty weird tbh.

they have cockerels all round the ground, and on the north west front they have it on the tiles "TOTTENHAM HOTSPUR FC", how much more signage should we have before someone might know it's our stadium

edit: dam i'm sure it was there someones changed it to established 1882, who nicked it:whistle:
 
Last edited:

mark87

Well-Known Member
Nov 29, 2004
36,255
115,240
they have cockerels all round the ground, and on the north west front they have it on the tiles "TOTTENHAM HOTSPUR FC", how much more signage should we have before someone might know it's our stadium

Well, a Bat-Signal style projector into the sky if you're asking...
 

Japseye

Member
Sep 20, 2004
75
92
Purely highlighting something I think is odd. Actually just saw the first design did have the name, so wonder why they then ditched it. The club has made a big deal about retaining tradition. There has always been the club name outside the stadium. Why on earth would I come hear to troll the stadium. Anyone that follows me on twitter knows how positive I am about it. People bring up concerns constantly on ssc and have mature debate about it. But as soon as you bring up a concern here you get shot down for being a troll. It’s pretty weird tbh.

You are correct the renders do not have Tottenham Hotspur Football Club on the outside of the stadium, however i personally think there are a few possible reasons for this:

a) the Club feel no need to spell it out, the moto's, crest and other signage around the stadium makes it clear enough

b) as Tottenhamboy85 states it could well be planned as part of the large digital screen

c) they could have special plans for the exterior under veil lighting that they have not mentioned too much

d) it may jeopardise Daniel/Joe's hopes of attracting a permanent NFL franchise

e) the lack of stadium sponsor is telling, and the Club may feel leaving prime space for a sponsors name to go up is necessary

All in all i don't need our clubs name on the side of stand to know its our new home and looks to be a bloody good one.

My preference is for the understated crest in both the veil and concrete - but each to their own; sure enough the club cant win, whatever they had done someone would have issue.

Coys200 - I value you sharing info, i am not on twitter so when you and others share info I appreciate it, i may or may not agree/believe but i always appreciate it. Your opinions however while you may argue otherwise tend to be 'nit-picky' and negative...
 

coys200

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2017
8,436
17,403
You are correct the renders do not have Tottenham Hotspur Football Club on the outside of the stadium, however i personally think there are a few possible reasons for this:

a) the Club feel no need to spell it out, the moto's, crest and other signage around the stadium makes it clear enough

b) as Tottenhamboy85 states it could well be planned as part of the large digital screen

c) they could have special plans for the exterior under veil lighting that they have not mentioned too much

d) it may jeopardise Daniel/Joe's hopes of attracting a permanent NFL franchise

e) the lack of stadium sponsor is telling, and the Club may feel leaving prime space for a sponsors name to go up is necessary

All in all i don't need our clubs name on the side of stand to know its our new home and looks to be a bloody good one.

My preference is for the understated crest in both the veil and concrete - but each to their own; sure enough the club cant win, whatever they had done someone would have issue.

Coys200 - I value you sharing info, i am not on twitter so when you and others share info I appreciate it, i may or may not agree/believe but i always appreciate it. Your opinions however while you may argue otherwise tend to be 'nit-picky' and negative...

Cheers for your grown up response. Out of curiosity I did a poll on twitter. Of the 83 votes 64% think it’s odd. So I don’t think I’m nit picking on this. I think it is something that will be mentioned by others in future.
 

Tottenhamboy85

Well-Known Member
Aug 16, 2018
2,505
7,901
Are those buildings in the 5-10 second mark staying? They look completely out of place. I've often heard people say the area is neglected... those buildings look like they should be demolished.
Isn’t that the area we want to knock down and build a Wembley way sort of thing to the train station?
 

Dougal

Staff
Jun 4, 2004
60,370
130,273
Isn’t that the area we want to knock down and build a Wembley way sort of thing to the train station?
4BAEFC3B-13A4-449D-99D8-20968ACB1DF5.jpeg
 

piedpiper

Well-Known Member
Aug 14, 2008
3,768
6,777
Isn’t that the area we want to knock down and build a Wembley way sort of thing to the train station?

Aah okay. It seriously looks out of place. Hope that is the intention. Sorry never had the privilege of visiting the stadium.

Dream of coming over in the future.
 

worcestersauce

"I'm no optimist I'm just a prisoner of hope
Jan 23, 2006
26,960
45,235
Isn’t that the area we want to knock down and build a Wembley way sort of thing to the train station?
Yep that's them, however I believe the problem with the council is about the Love lane estate behind them, basically where the video is being taken from.
I can't really believe that the council is determined to retain those buildings in preference to the new units in the original plans.
 

buckley

Well-Known Member
Sep 15, 2012
2,595
6,073
The council is run by far left people who have of now built nil new housing and have nil new build in the pipeline and no bank in there right mind is going to lend a momentum run council money in any case they are luddites as long as they can stop progress they will as they see progress led by people with money .All people with money are spawn of the devil to these cretins and would rather see the area collapse than allow investors as all investors are bad .
 
Top