Match Threads Spurs vs Palace - Match Thread - Day 26
- Thread starter Bulletspur
- Start date
cabinfever
Cabinfever's blue and white army
- May 14, 2004
- 1,931
- 2,013
Roy Keane, the voice of reason tonight.................never thought I’d say that!!
rez9000
Any point?
- Feb 8, 2007
- 11,942
- 21,098
That's racist! Tanguy identifies as half-Jawa, I'll have you know!
1882andallthat
Well-Known Member
- Feb 2, 2009
- 2,880
- 4,243
Souness having a pop at Bale clearly shows he's still got the hump at Liverpool losing at home again earlier today.
Colonel_Klinck
Well-Known Member
- May 19, 2004
- 12,731
- 23,368
You can see how players fell out with Souness when he was a manager. It would be so easy.
My god that was painful. They must have been shouting in the host’s war trying to move that on
You're wrong as well, then.
anydange
Well-Known Member
- Jan 31, 2013
- 3,668
- 7,643
All they do is say ‘that was shocking defending’ or ‘that was a sensational goal’.
That’s about it.
Indisguise
Well-Known Member
- Jun 9, 2012
- 7,996
- 23,386
I much prefer Micah to those two old ****s.
fuzzylogic
Well-Known Member
- Aug 2, 2004
- 4,776
- 9,168
would rather listen to Micah than those 2 clowns. Both bitter negative people who really think the world revolves around them.
TheVoiceofReason
Well-Known Member
- Feb 5, 2005
- 6,336
- 15,727
You think Keane and Souness are better pundits than Micah Richards? Constant, constant moaning and negativity is FAR too easy and so boring.
Colonel_Klinck
Well-Known Member
- May 19, 2004
- 12,731
- 23,368
He seems like a top lad you could have a great laugh with, the other 2 you’d just end up telling them to fuck off after a few pints.
Frozen_Waffles
Well-Known Member
- Jan 26, 2005
- 3,784
- 9,630
Wtf is Micah Richards doing being a pundit, he is not very eloquent and he repeats himself consistently.
He gets a bit too excited at times too. Doesn't seem the brightest.
He gets a bit too excited at times too. Doesn't seem the brightest.
daveduvet
Well-Known Member
- Oct 6, 2008
- 5,635
- 15,319
The thing with sky & their pundits is that they’re following the American model of post match/fight commentary... the punditry becomes an extension of the entertainment the game brings... therefore, they need to stretch out their opinions; create a ‘narrative’ and make the audience ‘consume’ their BS. It’s a farce - see J Rednapp v Keane; thin entertainment and bollox
coysjod
Well-Known Member
- Feb 18, 2011
- 1,440
- 4,230
Blasphemy, stone him!!!
daveduvet
Well-Known Member
- Oct 6, 2008
- 5,635
- 15,319
I agree he’s a twat
