- Jun 28, 2013
- 1,785
- 3,818
I think it's right Levy has control over the Kane situation. He knows what his value is, and he won't back down from it. People would moan if he sold for less.
100% agree with this. And there will always be friction between the holder of the asset and the person wanting to spend the money.
Strange analogy I know but if you had a family heirloom and you promised your wife that you would sell it so she could upgrade the kitchen.
You know it’s worth 150m. But your wife is only interested in a new kitchen and is begging you to sell for 100m so she can have a new kitchen.
You know that a new kitchen will increase the price and desirability of your home. But you will not sacrifice 60m just so you can get the new kitchen.