What's new

ENIC...

Status
Not open for further replies.

g_harry

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2005
2,947
4,649
Jack Pitt brooke made a great point on the athletic pod.

We should be competing with the dortmunds, athletico Madrids of the world but we don't do one thing they do.

Sell players

Nobody can compete financially with the dirty oil money clubs but you can put a great system in place, clever choice of coach and rejuvenate the squad every few years.

I think through levys experiences with modric and berbatov he is dead against selling players, well top ones but actually if we had sold kane and even maybe son we could have rejuvenated the whole team.

Of course it relies on great scouting and buying those young hungry players so that's another layer we miss but it's a great point.

It's been pointed out that the squad is stale, tired and lacks hunger. Only one way that's being resolved. Sell most of them.

Be brave. Loan dele out to a club in a slower league, offer kane to a man utd and get best price for him. Get max value for players when we can and reinvest.

Just a thought.
Or just have backed Poch. There's a thought
 

Trojan

Active Member
Jun 12, 2021
44
157
As much as I’d love to see the back of Levy and ENIC the biggest problem that remains is who would now be willing to buy us at our current value?

Personnally, I can’t see anyone who wants to see a successful team winning trophies willing to part with that amount of money unless it’s an oil rich nation with dubious human rights issues.That would only leave another ENIC style investment company who would only be interested in making money and not the playing side, one that would do the same as Levy and do just enough to keep fans spending. I could well be wrong but with my limited knowledge of the finance world I can’t see any other options.

My informed opinion is that JL would like to cash in on his investment but unfortunately DL doesn’t and want to see his plan through to the end, quite what that is I’ve no idea, maybe the naming rights but I don’t imagine that would be it.

I don’t seriously believe that Levy has any interest in football apart from the fact that he is making a ton of money out of it and had the club sold Kane with Levy getting his asking price I don’t believe for one minute that more than 50-60m would have been reinvested.
 

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,707
105,015

Wsussexspur

Well-Known Member
Oct 2, 2007
8,918
10,177


Are we being trolled again! Or have the BSoDL been out in force influencing this apparent “research” .

Enic 5th most popular owners in the premier league!!
 

Archibald&Crooks

Aegina Expat
Admin
Feb 1, 2005
55,716
206,118


Are we being trolled again! Or have the BSoDL been out in force influencing this apparent “research” .

Enic 5th most popular owners in the premier league!!
From the article: Based on analysis by (edited out but ***bets).com, which analysed social media activity from fans directed towards owners

classic clickbait fuckallism.........It has no credibility. At all :D
 

rez9000

Any point?
Feb 8, 2007
11,942
21,098
We have to stop thinking in terms of a zero sum game - that it's either ENIC or slaver.

It doesn't have to be that way. ENIC can remain as owners. There doesn't have to be a massive change for us to become competitive again.

All it would need is to stop making purchasing decisions for financial reasons and a slight easing of the self-imposed restrictions on spending.

We can have ENIC and be happy. Either with Levy no longer the chief executive - instead have a chief executive charged with improving the club's prospects on the field, or for Levy himself to start acting the right way.

And get football people on the board. Like Ajax who have Van Der Saar as the President and Marc Overmars as the executive. We have two nominally football people on the board - Hitchen and Paratici. Arrayed against them we have Levy, who has done fuck all in football before, Donna Cullen, who has done fuck all in football before, Matthew Collecott, who has done, etc. etc., Rebecca Caplehorn, who has, etc, etc, and Jonathan Turner. I'll leave you to guess whether Jonny has done anything in football...

We're run by suits. We should be run by football people.

Look at Leicester - their owner isn't a football person, so he gives football people the tools to do things. It's not the most sustainable model as they spend far more than they earn, but we're in no danger of doing that. We have resources Leicester can only dream of. So why have they won two titles in the last six years, while we've had none?

Because they understand that a football club's primary priority is football, not finance.
 

rossdapep

Well-Known Member
Aug 25, 2011
22,448
80,961
Jack Pitt brooke made a great point on the athletic pod.

We should be competing with the dortmunds, athletico Madrids of the world but we don't do one thing they do.

Sell players

Nobody can compete financially with the dirty oil money clubs but you can put a great system in place, clever choice of coach and rejuvenate the squad every few years.

I think through levys experiences with modric and berbatov he is dead against selling players, well top ones but actually if we had sold kane and even maybe son we could have rejuvenated the whole team.

Of course it relies on great scouting and buying those young hungry players so that's another layer we miss but it's a great point.

It's been pointed out that the squad is stale, tired and lacks hunger. Only one way that's being resolved. Sell most of them.

Be brave. Loan dele out to a club in a slower league, offer kane to a man utd and get best price for him. Get max value for players when we can and reinvest.

Just a thought.
I certainly agree with this.

But you need a sporting director and footballing people at the head of this with a clear idea of what they are doing.

If you had a DOF at the time back in 2017, they would have been able to assess that Dier and Rose (for example) were peaking and that selling them could generate 80m and they'd already have replacements lined up for half the fee.

The only issue is whether Poch was unprepared to sell at that point. We know by 2018 he was starting to want some out of the door but it sounded like he was not happy when Dier was talking to Jose.

But that's why you need a coach who understands that structure too.

It's a real shame cause we could have brought in some real depth back then and it would have allowed for smooth continuation.
 

rossdapep

Well-Known Member
Aug 25, 2011
22,448
80,961
We have to stop thinking in terms of a zero sum game - that it's either ENIC or slaver.

It doesn't have to be that way. ENIC can remain as owners. There doesn't have to be a massive change for us to become competitive again.

All it would need is to stop making purchasing decisions for financial reasons and a slight easing of the self-imposed restrictions on spending.

We can have ENIC and be happy. Either with Levy no longer the chief executive - instead have a chief executive charged with improving the club's prospects on the field, or for Levy himself to start acting the right way.

And get football people on the board. Like Ajax who have Van Der Saar as the President and Marc Overmars as the executive. We have two nominally football people on the board - Hitchen and Paratici. Arrayed against them we have Levy, who has done fuck all in football before, Donna Cullen, who has done fuck all in football before, Matthew Collecott, who has done, etc. etc., Rebecca Caplehorn, who has, etc, etc, and Jonathan Turner. I'll leave you to guess whether Jonny has done anything in football...

We're run by suits. We should be run by football people.

Look at Leicester - their owner isn't a football person, so he gives football people the tools to do things. It's not the most sustainable model as they spend far more than they earn, but we're in no danger of doing that. We have resources Leicester can only dream of. So why have they won two titles in the last six years, while we've had none?

Because they understand that a football club's primary priority is football, not finance.
You're making some outstanding posts at the moment, mate.
 

ohtottenham!

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2013
7,509
13,061
We can have ENIC and be happy. Either with Levy no longer the chief executive - instead have a chief executive charged with improving the club's prospects on the field, or for Levy himself to start acting the right way.
I agree with your general idea, Rez. But, how do either of these scenarios happen with Levy...?
 

tototoner

Staying Alert
Mar 21, 2004
29,418
34,201
ENIC have never been interested in improving us on the field, Levy lucked out getting in Pochettino and lucked out even more with Harry Kane coming through the ranks.

They only use our club as an investment vehicle but when ENIC stands for "English National Investment Company" this shouldn't surprise anyone
 
Last edited:

Metalhead

But that's a debate for another thread.....
Nov 24, 2013
25,524
38,712
ENIC have never been interested in improving us on the field, Levy lucked out getting in Pochettino and lucked out even more with Harry Kane coming through the ranks.

They only use our club as an investment vehicle but when ENIC stands for "English National Investment Company" this shouldn't surprise anymore.
Surely when you are an investment company you invest.
 

ohtottenham!

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2013
7,509
13,061
Surely when you are an investment company you invest.
Which is great for the few company shareholders that are on here. Unfortunately, the actual stakeholders aka THFC fans are not getting anything like the return on our own “investment” that ENIC is with theirs.
 

Metalhead

But that's a debate for another thread.....
Nov 24, 2013
25,524
38,712
Which is great for the few company shareholders that are on here. Unfortunately, the actual stakeholders aka THFC fans are not getting anything like the return on our own “investment” that ENIC is with theirs.
No what I mean is that the fact that they are an investment company should be a positive - the old adage 'speculate to accumulate' springs to mind.
 

ohtottenham!

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2013
7,509
13,061
No what I mean is that the fact that they are an investment company should be a positive - the old adage 'speculate to accumulate' springs to mind.
The fact that they're an investment company doesn't mean anything beyond getting max profit from their own investment.
 

Metalhead

But that's a debate for another thread.....
Nov 24, 2013
25,524
38,712
The fact that they're an investment company doesn't mean anything beyond getting max profit from their own investment.
For me, it's more about the decisions that have been made over the years than the money spent. Look at the Bale money - that's as good an example as any.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top