What's new

James Maddison

A

AJW

Well-Known Member
Jan 7, 2007
3,533
6,413
Mr Pink said:
I'd say it'd be 50 million minimum.
Click to expand...
More in my opinion. Richarlison was 50 + 10 and they were under more financial pressure than Leicester. You also have the English tax. I don’t think they would discuss for any less than 65/70.
 
Mr Pink

Mr Pink

SC Supporter
Aug 25, 2010
55,367
100,858
AJW said:
More in my opinion. Richarlison was 50 + 10 and they were under more financial pressure than Leicester. You also have the English tax. I don’t think they would discuss for any less than 65/70.
Click to expand...

We'll not be paying 70 that's for sure.

I think 60 max.
 
A

AJW

Well-Known Member
Jan 7, 2007
3,533
6,413
Mr Pink said:
We'll not be paying 70 that's for sure.

I think 60 max.
Click to expand...
I agree that we won’t want to go beyond 60. But I just don’t think they will accept it. That’s why I can’t see it happening. They will still get 30/40 million for him next year with a year left on his deal.
 
Mr Pink

Mr Pink

SC Supporter
Aug 25, 2010
55,367
100,858
AJW said:
I agree that we won’t want to go beyond 60. But I just don’t think they will accept it. That’s why I can’t see it happening. They will still get 30/40 million for him next year with a year left on his deal.
Click to expand...

I guess it depends on who they can get in this summer and if there's value to be had in their other business if they get the funds in now...or who's just simply available for a mini rebuild etc

Lots of variables so hard to say.
 
R

Ron Burgundy

SC Supporter
Jun 19, 2008
7,757
23,453
AJW said:
I agree that we won’t want to go beyond 60. But I just don’t think they will accept it. That’s why I can’t see it happening. They will still get 30/40 million for him next year with a year left on his deal.
Click to expand...
100%

If he was clearly the final piece in the jigsaw and we weren’t spending big elsewhere, maybe, but I can’t see we’d be prepared to pay what they would (understandably) ask
 
worcestersauce

worcestersauce

"I'm no optimist I'm just a prisoner of hope
Jan 23, 2006
27,007
45,318
Whatever the fee is, and we know what it is (ITK) we've been told we have the money for it (also ITK).
Rather than not letting him go I get the impression Leicester are trying to move it along now.
 
jedimonkey

jedimonkey

COYS!
Jan 28, 2011
1,849
4,230
olliec said:
Is it possible the board would of seen these tweets and decide to pull away? I guess he was a kid at the time, but still pretty offensive.
Click to expand...

These were brought up years ago when we were first linked with him. The club would know about them and if we really have been in talks about signing him then I guess they aren't bothered about them.
 
sundanceyid10

sundanceyid10

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2013
3,379
8,319
AJW said:
I agree that we won’t want to go beyond 60. But I just don’t think they will accept it. That’s why I can’t see it happening. They will still get 30/40 million for him next year with a year left on his deal.
Click to expand...
Unless we try to work Winks into some kind of deal.
 
R

Ron Burgundy

SC Supporter
Jun 19, 2008
7,757
23,453
worcestersauce said:
Whatever the fee is, and we know what it is (ITK) we've been told we have the money for it (also ITK).
Rather than not letting him go I get the impression Leicester are trying to move it along now.
Click to expand...
I think that's a rather optimistic take, personally. But I hope you're right
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

mawspurs
James Maddison impressed by Tottenham teammate Pape Matar Sarr
Replies
0
Views
222
mawspurs
mawspurs
mawspurs
James Maddison issues positive Tottenham injury update
Replies
2
Views
625
E17yid
E17yid
mawspurs
Son shares what he told James Maddison before he even signed for Tottenham
Replies
1
Views
364
Gassin's finest
Gassin's finest
Top