What's new

Conor Gallagher

JonnySpurs

SC Veteran
Jun 4, 2004
5,346
12,398
I'm certainly not as convinced as I once was but the HG quota works, he chips in with goals and works hard. He certainly wouldn't be bad addition, by any means.

It would also annoy Chelsea fans massively, so that's an added bonus
 

Ghost Hardware

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
18,390
63,318
My biggest concern would be selling Gio and replacing him with Gallagher. Would be an awful move imo as he’s not a playmaker.

Thing is with him is I’m not sure where he fits, he’s probably best as an 8 but the last thing we need is another 8. Is he actually strong enough defensively from a positioning and tackling perspective to be a 6? I’m not so sure. Personally I think there are better options out there but I appreciate he’s hg and Ange has a hard on for him. Almost feels inevitable if Chelsea decides to sell.
 

dontcallme

SC Supporter
Mar 18, 2005
34,351
83,664
Chelsea gonna want big money so he won’t be moved till the end of the window if at all.

I rather focus elsewhere and get players in early.
The thing is, their board seems a bit incompetent to say the least. It seems they need to sell a lot to meet FFP requirements and he'll only have a year left on his contract. If they ask for too much then clubs will simply look elsewhere.

They're not selling from a position of power here.
 

dontcallme

SC Supporter
Mar 18, 2005
34,351
83,664
My biggest concern would be selling Gio and replacing him with Gallagher. Would be an awful move imo as he’s not a playmaker.

Thing is with him is I’m not sure where he fits, he’s probably best as an 8 but the last thing we need is another 8. Is he actually strong enough defensively from a positioning and tackling perspective to be a 6? I’m not so sure. Personally I think there are better options out there but I appreciate he’s hg and Ange has a hard on for him. Almost feels inevitable if Chelsea decides to sell.
Do you think Kulusevski could be moving a bit deeper to take on the playmaker role?

With Lo Celso also having a year left on his contract we might choose to sell regardless of what other business we're doing.
 

ajspurs

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2007
23,214
31,543
My biggest concern would be selling Gio and replacing him with Gallagher. Would be an awful move imo as he’s not a playmaker.

Thing is with him is I’m not sure where he fits, he’s probably best as an 8 but the last thing we need is another 8. Is he actually strong enough defensively from a positioning and tackling perspective to be a 6? I’m not so sure. Personally I think there are better options out there but I appreciate he’s hg and Ange has a hard on for him. Almost feels inevitable if Chelsea decides to sell.

Yeah he definitely wouldn't be ideal as a 6. If Ange really does want him, I feel like it would be largely because of his energy and intensity, and capability to press all day long. But I can understand the questions of where he would fit too. I guess he has a different profile to Bentancur, but it would still leave things a bit stacked with a 6 being a high requirement.

Replacing Lo Celso with him would be terrible also. We don't want to make the same mistake we made with Eriksen for so many years, in that one injury would leave us with no guile in the squad.

As @dontcallme mentions in Kulusevski being the replacement, that would personally worry me a bit too.
 

felmani26

SC Supporter
Jan 1, 2008
24,584
43,505
My biggest concern would be selling Gio and replacing him with Gallagher. Would be an awful move imo as he’s not a playmaker.

Thing is with him is I’m not sure where he fits, he’s probably best as an 8 but the last thing we need is another 8. Is he actually strong enough defensively from a positioning and tackling perspective to be a 6? I’m not so sure. Personally I think there are better options out there but I appreciate he’s hg and Ange has a hard on for him. Almost feels inevitable if Chelsea decides to sell.
I would have thought it's Hojbjerg (and possibly Skipp) that Gallagher replaces with someone like Baena for replacing Gio.

Still require an upgrade at 6 though but if the financials stack up and we can streamline the squad with 2 out, 1 in and still retain the same HG quota then that's presumably the mindset here.
 

Ghost Hardware

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
18,390
63,318
I would have thought it's Hojbjerg (and possibly Skipp) that Gallagher replaces with someone like Baena for replacing Gio.

Still require an upgrade at 6 though but if the financials stack up and we can streamline the squad with 2 out, 1 in and still retain the same HG quota then that's presumably the mindset here.
That would most certainly be the hope, I agree with @ajspurs regarding his work rate being a very attractive quality for us above all else. Thing is i don’t see us getting 3 midfielders in this summer so if Gallagher is one of them he’s ether playing 10 or 6 and neither do I feel he is particularly right for.

I’m hoping if he joins it’s the 6 role we have earmarked for him but would be really be the upgrade we need in that position? Im not so sure.
 

Neon_Knight_

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2011
4,016
6,680
I wouldn't mind Gallagher, especially with all the games we'll have to play. I think it would be massive to have the option to, for example, play on a Wednesday/Thursday with Sarr, to then be able to play on the Saturday/Sunday with a fresh Gallagher, or vice versa. Same for when we need fresh legs in the second half of games without sacrificing quality.

Definitely think he'd help to not run options into the ground, but maintain the required level too.
We can already do that with Sarr & Bentancur.
 

GutBucket

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2013
6,855
11,553
One thing he has going for him is inujury record. So far he was never injured and missed only 4 games due to illness.
 

HildoSpur

Likes Erik Lamela, deal with it.
Oct 1, 2005
9,153
28,640
Which of the midfield positions would he be for? I'm all for squad depth but my assumption would be that he plays in the Sarr / Bentancur position which doesn't feel a priority for spending big on
Sarr rotation
 

HildoSpur

Likes Erik Lamela, deal with it.
Oct 1, 2005
9,153
28,640
My biggest concern would be selling Gio and replacing him with Gallagher. Would be an awful move imo as he’s not a playmaker.

Thing is with him is I’m not sure where he fits, he’s probably best as an 8 but the last thing we need is another 8. Is he actually strong enough defensively from a positioning and tackling perspective to be a 6? I’m not so sure. Personally I think there are better options out there but I appreciate he’s hg and Ange has a hard on for him. Almost feels inevitable if Chelsea decides to sell.
He wouldn't be coming in to replace Gio imo - he would be coming in to replace Hojberg and possibly Skipp as well
 

ajspurs

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2007
23,214
31,543
We can already do that with Sarr & Bentancur.

I agree, but I would only guess it may be a profile preference with someone like Gallagher. He may just have more of the characteristics that Ange sees as being fit for his vision.
 

Ghost Hardware

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
18,390
63,318
Do you think Kulusevski could be moving a bit deeper to take on the playmaker role?

With Lo Celso also having a year left on his contract we might choose to sell regardless of what other business we're doing.
It’s certainly a possibility but I feel like that might well be a recipe for disaster. If anything I feel Kulu would probably work better as an 8 but we are well stocked there. Maybe he does adapt to the 10 role but considering how prone to injury Maddison is I feel it could be quite a big gamble to have him as our back up playmaker.
 

HildoSpur

Likes Erik Lamela, deal with it.
Oct 1, 2005
9,153
28,640
A choice of Sarr, Bentancur, Gallagher and Bissouma with Bergvall or Skipp as the young backup would be excellent.
It would be, it would be even better if we managed to bring in Archie Gray as well. That would spell the end for Skipp of course.
 

felmani26

SC Supporter
Jan 1, 2008
24,584
43,505
That would most certainly be the hope, I agree with @ajspurs regarding his work rate being a very attractive quality for us above all else. Thing is i don’t see us getting 3 midfielders in this summer so if Gallagher is one of them he’s ether playing 10 or 6 and neither do I feel he is particularly right for.

I’m hoping if he joins it’s the 6 role we have earmarked for him but would be really be the upgrade we need in that position? Im not so sure.
With European football we will need more depth and even without Cup distractions this year Hojbjerg more than played his part so it's flexibility across the midfield trio (primarily 8/6) that will appeal to Ange albeit I don't see Gallagher as a master of either but then any squad has those players when you are competing on multiple fronts.

The intangibles are also a factor here in how he is as an individual and leadership skills which i'm guessing they've already made tentative enquiries about and how he would fit in to not only the system but the squad dynamic.
 

felmani26

SC Supporter
Jan 1, 2008
24,584
43,505
It would be, it would be even better if we managed to bring in Archie Gray as well. That would spell the end for Skipp of course.
It could spell the end for Bissouma as well and i'd still be all for it.

Special talent indeed.
 

HarryKane

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2015
148
901
I remain convinced that many people's reticence is simply because he's a Chelsea player and Chelsea is his club. Had he played for the likes Brighton or Everton I think there'd be less resistance.
Personally I am in favour, he gives his all and makes an impression on a game.
He's good and better than he's given credit for but his best position is as an 8 which is where Bentancur and Sarr are best. Lets him do some stuff defensively, be on the front foot winning things back pressing and contributing a bit further forward. However the ones going will likely be Hojbjerg and GLC and he fits neither of those positions - as a 6 he's too restricted with his engine where he can be proactive winnig it back further up and he's not on the same level as Madders and GLC with the ball. Right now it's £40-50m on the midfield position where the club are arguably strongest overall, the only way it makes sense is if one of Bentacur or Sarr are sold and I'm sorry but he isn't on their level, a fully fit Bentancur is class and Sarr's quality while being 2.5 years younger

Okay Skipp might go but he doesn't play much right now (he has a free squad place in europe being club trained so could stay regardless), Bergvall's joining next season and looks like another 8, maybe he doesn't make the step up but he looks talented. Just thinking about it, the #8 might be the strongest position at the club overall going into the summer with 3 talented options to pick for one place in the first 11? For me it's money can be spent better elsewhere unless Ange is convinced he will come in and be the defacto starter for next season. But then you have 4 players for one position so someone's going to be sold. I'd much rather see it spent on someone like Gray (replacing Hojbjerg) and another young talent, or Todibo who's apparently possible for a similar fee (£40m)
 

DogsOfWar

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2005
2,303
3,645
I like him, a Jack of all trades style CM who reminds me of the under appreciated Henderson.

I think him and Bergvall in for PEH and Skipp would be a significant upgrade.
 

sidford

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2003
11,392
29,943
I'm not one for blindly accepting decisions but if after spending c9 months with our squad and also the level of knowledge of Gallagher that he has at this stage if he still wants him this badly then I would be fully behind it.
It wouldn't be who I would sign but if he wants him for this long then you have to push to get him
 
Top