What's new

An interview with 'Arry (and his view of Tommy H)

Status
Not open for further replies.

rebrab

Harry Cool
Jun 13, 2008
6,437
22,253
The old ones are the best and Harry Redknapp went into work on Thursday to begin preparation for Tottenham's encounter at Stoke this afternoon desperate to tell his favourite story about Tony Pulis. It is one he has recounted before, but such is his enduring skill as a raconteur it never fails to raise a laugh.
'I was telling the players only this morning about when I signed Tony for Bournemouth,' he says with almost boyish enthusiasm. 'I'd driven all the way to Newport on a wet, wintry Tuesday night to see him play. When I got there I made my way across this car park full of puddles to an old wooden hut where I could get a cup of tea, and when I walk in he's sitting there. "I've just driven for six hours to see you play," I said to him. "Oh dear," he says. He'd been dropped.

This time, though, Redknapp recalls the story for a reason because it is part of a much wider point he wishes to make. That, more often than not, the old ones are indeed the best.
If this particular 63-year-old oldie guides his side past the Young Boys of Berne on Wednesday night, he will become only the fourth Englishman to manage in the Champions League. That's if we ignore Steve McClaren and Tony Mowbray on the grounds that they failed to progress beyond the qualifiers and into the first group stage.
If we stick to those rules, only Sir Bobby Robson, Howard Wilkinson and Ray Harford have been there before in the 18 years since the European Cup was given a makeover.
Which makes Redknapp the perfect guy to ask not only why that's the case but also what, after the bitter disappointment of the World Cup, is wrong with the English element of the English game. An English game now in such a mess that we do not so much welcome a declaration from the Football Association that Fabio Capello's successor will be English, as start to panic about who on earth it could be. Especially when two of the country's brightest coaches, McClaren and Glenn Hoddle, have been used and discarded having been given the job long before they were ready.
For many people it should be Redknapp next, his age, experience, man-management skills and success - not just in guiding Tottenham into the top four last season but at Portsmouth and West Ham prior to that - certainly making him an obvious candidate. The man himself shakes his head, however.
'I'd like to start by saying I'm very happy here at Tottenham, but I don't think the FA would ever go for me anyway,' he says.

'I don't think I would ever get the job. I don't know why exactly. I just get the feeling that maybe I wouldn't be their cup of tea. When Capello eventually moves on, I suspect they'll go for a younger man, even though I think it's a job that demands experience. But they're saying they want an Englishman, and while I'd like to see that, I don't see anybody jumping out at me. If Roy (Hodgson) does great at Liverpool he could be a contender but by the time Capello moves on Roy's 65, and you have to wonder if he'd still want it. Right now, I'm just not sure there's an obvious replacement.'


And why? Because the English managers Redknapp would like to one day see at the FA - guys like Sam Allardyce and Steve Bruce - are unlikely to get the opportunity to work at the very highest level and so satisfy the governing body that they are suitable for such a demanding role. For arguably the toughest job in football.

'It's only because they don't get the opportunity to manage a topfour team,' says Redknapp. 'And if you don't get the opportunity to manage one of those clubs, it's going to be very difficult. Everton got there once and we did it last season but, other than that, it's the same teams every year.
'And look at them. The Manchester United job has long been sewn up by Alex (Ferguson). It's been the same at Arsenal with Arsene (Wenger). Chelsea have changed managers but they always go foreign. Liverpool are the only exception, having just gone for Roy, but right now they're not top four.
'As an Englishman, you often have to get promoted to even manage in the Premier League these days. Look at Tony Pulis and Ian Holloway. Guys who have had to learn their trade; work their way up. The way I did when I was doing my own scouting to find players like Tony.
'It's becoming more and more difficult to get an opportunity. Especially when so many owners are now foreign. When's an Englishman going to buy a football club again?
'For the most part it's not happening. I was delighted to see David Sullivan and David Gold take charge at West Ham because it's their club. But Blackburn might be getting new foreign owners. Same at Liverpool. You never hear it's going to be an Englishman.
'And foreign owners invariably go for foreign managers. A sexy name. Some superstar from Italy. And they give them millions to spend, which makes it an easier job. This game is about players and they get the chance to buy fantastic players. If you put them at Blackpool would these managers do any better than Ian Holloway? I doubt it. But they won't have to because they will always get the top jobs.'




Redknapp's fears for the future of the English game go beyond the lack of chances for managers, however. He is worried about the next generation of English players, too.
'I'm concerned about the younger kids because I think we are ruining them,' he says. 'These days, clubs are giving four-year contracts to 15-year-olds. By the time they are 17 or 18 they are on six grand a week. Plus bonuses and all that rubbish. It's crazy, and I think a lot of the lads lose that hunger. They get a professional contract and they think they've already made it.
'Sometimes you can't send them out on loan to a lower division club because they are already earning too much money. I was reading what Gary Neville said the other day, how at the end of each season you'd just be glad to be told you'd got another year. You felt like you'd won the pools
'Today we make it too easy for them, and as a result they don't work hard enough, don't stay out on the training ground and work on becoming the best that they can be.
'When I was at West Ham as a kid, Ron Greenwood would tell us that someone would keep the training ground open for as long as we wanted to be there. We played on a concrete pitch behind the ground, doing shooting practice, playing five-a-side. Ron, who was the best coach I ever saw, said someone would always wait around to lock up after us if we wanted to stay behind and work with a football.
'Frank Lampard trained harder than any kid I ever saw. He got that work ethic from his dad. He was a great trainer too, and it rubbed off on Rio Ferdinand, Joe Cole and Michael Carrick.
'I remember Frank getting some running spikes to work on his speed. He'd be there in the afternoons doing his sprints, getting faster. You don't find too many kids like that these days. They don't want to be out there all afternoon. I've told kids to get some spikes but I'm not sure they ever do.'
Redknapp's focus has to be on the players who have worked hard enough to secure a place in his first team squad. He speaks of Luka Modric being 'the perfect professional', and raves about Tom Huddlestone's performance in Switzerland this week. 'That boy has the talent to be anything he wants,' says Redknapp.
He is desperate to add more strength to his squad before the summer transfer window closes. 'It's not easy because there is so little movement in the transfer market,' he says. 'But we need to do something because I think this season is going to be tougher than ever.


'It gave me a lot of satisfaction to finish fourth. But looking at it now, Man City have got to be in the top four. Looking at that squad it's going to be hard to keep them out. Liverpool are going to be back this year. Aston Villa, Everton. And then, of course, you've got Arsenal, Chelsea and Manchester United. So it's going to be very tough.'
Right now, though, he wants to be part of this season's Champions League, which means responding to a nervy 3-2 defeat on a plastic pitch in Berne and securing a place in Thursday's draw in Monaco.
'I learnt a lesson the other day,' he admits. 'Never underestimate anyone. I learnt that years ago because when I was at Bournemouth we always raised our game against the bigger teams. That's how we beat Manchester United. It can happen. It happens in the Cup every year.
'We were lucky the other night. We didn't like the pitch. We were feeling sorry for ourselves. The tie could have been over before the second leg at White Hart Lane. But Tom came on and did great, and in the end we did well to give ourselves a chance. The chance to enjoy what would be a great experience for me and the players.'
The kind of experience so few Englishmen get these days.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...hink-Id-England-job-I-feeling-Im-cup-tea.html



There's the interview, some people will say "where does Hudd come into this" but I've noticed he's been singled out a few times recently, even today when his performance wasn't what I would describe as "standout". Thoughts?
 

Pringle

Well-Known Member
Dec 25, 2006
3,580
516
great interview. Hudd's performance on Tues kept us in the CL imo. People rave about Modric in CM but him and WP were torn apart in the first 30 mins - then as soon as Hudd came in and Modric moved out wide we controlled the game for the majority. I love HR!
 

Spurger King

can't smile without glue
Jul 22, 2008
43,881
95,149
I was shouting at Harry through the tv to bring Hudd on, and he duly obliged. I thought he was quietly outstanding.

So I think you all owe me a big thank you for making it happen.
 

kcmei

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2008
7,112
1,330
hudd is a key player who can hold the team together winning battles in the midfield
 

Rout-Ledge

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2005
9,708
21,974
Hudd will be a big big player for us in the years to come. WIth a midfield of him Modric, and Bale (and possibly Lennon, who I like, but I don't think is on the same level, ability wise as the other three), we're looking very good for the future!
 

walworthyid

David Ginola
Oct 25, 2004
7,059
10,242
Hudd will be a big big player for us in the years to come. WIth a midfield of him Modric, and Bale (and possibly Lennon, who I like, but I don't think is on the same level, ability wise as the other three), we're looking very good for the future!

Lennon has great ability and was as good as any player in the prem before xmas last season. He has searing pace, he is a grafter, great attitude, scores goals, can cross with both feet and provides consistent assists to his team mates. I would really swap for any other right sided player. At his best he would get into any team in the prem.

Hudd has grown over the last 2 seasons and I for one must eat some humble pie after being a massive critic of his for a long time. He now plays with great intelligence and poise. He is now one of the best holding mids in the prem with added bonus that he can create. For me, he is simply a class above Gareth Barry, he just lacks Barry's industry.
 

Yid-ol

Just-outside Edinburgh
Jan 16, 2006
31,252
19,543
Lennon has great ability and was as good as any player in the prem before xmas last season. He has searing pace, he is a grafter, great attitude, scores goals, can cross with both feet and provides consistent assists to his team mates. I would really swap for any other right sided player. At his best he would get into any team in the prem.

Hudd has grown over the last 2 seasons and I for one must eat some humble pie after being a massive critic of his for a long time. He now plays with great intelligence and poise. He is now one of the best holding mids in the prem with added bonus that he can create. For me, he is simply a class above Gareth Barry, he just lacks Barry's industry.

When carrick left some people on here said it was ok we had Hudd who had something more than carrick! which was true, its just taken so damn long for him to get to where he is now :lol: Hudd just seems to get better and better
 

guate

Well-Known Member
May 12, 2005
3,270
1,486
Amazing to think that it's taken this hugely intimidating yet friendly giant from Derby four years to become the player we all hoped he could be. We all see his impressive talent from day 1 but it seemed for so long that he was always afraid of his own size, afraid of going into tackles in case he hurt someone, afraid to put his massive frame about. Well, guess what, that's no longer the case and whether it's down to 'Arry, Joe Jordan, Kevin Bonds or whoever we now have a player who can dictate the game like the best around and he's still only 23 !!!!!
 

SpurSince57

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2006
45,213
8,229
Amazing to think that it's taken this hugely intimidating yet friendly giant from Derby four years to become the player we all hoped he could be. We all see his impressive talent from day 1 but it seemed for so long that he was always afraid of his own size, afraid of going into tackles in case he hurt someone, afraid to put his massive frame about. Well, guess what, that's no longer the case and whether it's down to 'Arry, Joe Jordan, Kevin Bonds or whoever we now have a player who can dictate the game like the best around and he's still only 23 !!!!!

Not amazing at all. It's a pretty reasonable time-scale, and it will probably be another season at least before we see him truly fulfil his potential.

But you're dead right in saying that it's our coaching staff, derided by some, that has developed him into what he is now—as they've developed Bale, Lennon and others.
 

agrdavidsfan

Ledley's Knee!
Aug 25, 2005
10,918
13,352
Huddlestone is brilliant i personally recon hes better than carrick all he needs to do is add some more goals to his game it wernt so long ago everybody wanted us to sell him to fulham and so on ha.

Only down point on hud is his speed and he doesnt score enough but apart from that he is a beast espec now hes learnt how to get stuck in ha.
 

SpurSince57

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2006
45,213
8,229
Huddlestone is brilliant i personally recon hes better than carrick all he needs to do is add some more goals to his game it wernt so long ago everybody wanted us to sell him to fulham and so on ha.

Only down point on hud is his speed and he doesnt score enough but apart from that he is a beast espec now hes learnt how to get stuck in ha.

Discerning Blackeye fans (they do exist—honest!) would have loved him to take over from the hugely underrated Tugay, who had no more pace than Hudd but was a seriously cultured footballer.
 

Misfit

President of The Niles Crane Fanclub
May 7, 2006
21,346
35,261
Not amazing at all. It's a pretty reasonable time-scale, and it will probably be another season at least before we see him truly fulfil his potential.

But you're dead right in saying that it's our coaching staff, derided by some, that has developed him into what he is now—as they've developed Bale, Lennon and others.
Indeed. Very few CMs are the finished article at 23. He's still got plenty of growing to do, football-wise. His peak is a few yrs off yet. I hope we see them at the Lane.
 

Berglad

Well-Known Member
Aug 12, 2008
2,557
2,749
I just re-watched today's game with a buddy who missed the game...Huddlestone didn't do that much today but what he did was absolutely vital.

In the 2nd half almost everyone was very jittery, giving the ball away or lumping it aimlessly forward. Huddlestone would get into space to receive the ball, protect it while he looked for the right pass, then would measure a ball right to who he wanted to give it to. An absolutely vital calming presence when many others were starting to panic.

Great player that's going to get better and better.
 

Bus-Conductor

SC Supporter
Oct 19, 2004
39,837
50,713
That's weird because Hudlestone actually gave the ball away more than Palacios and Jenas put together. That's a fact, but don't let it hamper your romantic perception.

I have always said that I can make a case for Huddlestone in a 451 and I think that our midfielders all did pretty well today but why would anyone being objective pick out Huddlestone as opposed to Jenas. They both saw the ball 68 times, but Hudd gave it away 13, Jenas 6. Jenas was the player getting up and down the pitch, only a foul preventing him from scoring, playing the best pass of the game that put Bale clean through, blocking Etherington's goal bound shot and was by far our best player on the day.

Why are people so willing to look so hard to see what Huddlestone does well, but seem blind to what Jenas does well. If Huddlestone had played that pass to Bale, Joey would be posting youtube clips and everyone would be wanking each other off.

Like I said, I think all our midfielders did well in a tough game today but any non biased observer would surely have picked Jenas's performance out of the three CM's.

In a 451 I can understand the case for Huddlestone, but having seen Jenas play that pass today, the interchange with Bale that should have been a goal, the fact that not only did he play two greta through balls but also was industrious and gave the ball away much less than Hudd, why isn't everyone wetting themselves over Jenas's performance, and declaring undying love. Especially as in the whole time that both players have been at the club, jenas has consistently outpassed, out created, out scored, out defended and out ran Huddlestone.

Jenas has always been a more valuable player in terms of overall contribution than Huddlestone, and I've not seen anything yet to suggest that that has changed. Today re-affirmed that opinion.
 

Spurger King

can't smile without glue
Jul 22, 2008
43,881
95,149
BC - I don't consider myself to be the most gifted of footballing analysts, but it seemed clear to me that when Hudd came on he calmed things down, delivered the right passes, and generally allowed the team to find their rhythm. Stats are a vague indication at best. They don't indicate movement, simple passes, right passes, completed passes that were the wrong passes...they don't show the multiple aspects of a game that statistics cannot.

As for Jenas, well I'm not one of those that pitches our own players against each other. I think Jenas is a good player. I've posted in the past that he is waaaayyy too inconsistent to be a regular at the moment, but when he is playing at the top of his game he is fantastic.
 

TwoSaintsComeMarching

PIMP-tastic
Jul 26, 2008
2,404
454
That's weird because Hudlestone actually gave the ball away more than Palacios and Jenas put together. That's a fact, but don't let it hamper your romantic perception.

I have always said that I can make a case for Huddlestone in a 451 and I think that our midfielders all did pretty well today but why would anyone being objective pick out Huddlestone as opposed to Jenas. They both saw the ball 68 times, but Hudd gave it away 13, Jenas 6. Jenas was the player getting up and down the pitch, only a foul preventing him from scoring, playing the best pass of the game that put Bale clean through, blocking Etherington's goal bound shot and was by far our best player on the day.

Why are people so willing to look so hard to see what Huddlestone does well, but seem blind to what Jenas does well. If Huddlestone had played that pass to Bale, Joey would be posting youtube clips and everyone would be wanking each other off.

Like I said, I think all our midfielders did well in a tough game today but any non biased observer would surely have picked Jenas's performance out of the three CM's.

In a 451 I can understand the case for Huddlestone, but having seen Jenas play that pass today, the interchange with Bale that should have been a goal, the fact that not only did he play two greta through balls but also was industrious and gave the ball away much less than Hudd, why isn't everyone wetting themselves over Jenas's performance, and declaring undying love. Especially as in the whole time that both players have been at the club, jenas has consistently outpassed, out created, out scored, out defended and out ran Huddlestone.

Jenas has always been a more valuable player in terms of overall contribution than Huddlestone, and I've not seen anything yet to suggest that that has changed. Today re-affirmed that opinion.

You truly are daft. Huddlestone and Jenas are two completely different players. One is a holding midfielder whilst the other is a box to box CM. So comparing their stats respective to the role they played is pointless and demonstrates your FM-esque understanding of football.

What Huddlestone does for the team is unique and cannot be compared to what JJ does. In my opinion a holding midfielder is absolutely crucial to the way we play and Huddlestone is the only player we have who plays this role (and Sandro now) - and he does a pretty damn good job!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top