- Jan 18, 2011
- 7,973
- 9,426
Not at all, we didn't bring in AVB because we were left high and dry, we brought him in as an improvement on the previous regime. Us and Liverpool need to be judged in the same way as far as managers go. What makes us different is that their manager was backed in the transfer window where as ours wasn't. They are as bad as they were results wise, and we are similar.
I think AVB has improved us slightly in defence, we at least look more organised even if we do concede more goals. But as an attacking force we are blunter than a rubber duck. And that's with Bale in the side too.
Overall, we've kept our heads at the same level, which is fine provided we finish that way.
I think a lot of people would be surprised to learn that after 32 games last season we had scored 56 goals compared to 55 this season. So as an attacking force we are just as 'blunt' as last season. But at this stage last season we were in the middle of a very poor run of form, so I think we'll probably score more goals overall this season. That's without a 17 goal contribution from Ade, as well as selling VDV and Modric who were our main creative players.
So I think AVB's done a good job in getting far less creative players to score just as many goals as last season. We definitely had more attacking talent last season so it's hard to argue that he hasn't done a good job. With the same players as last season I think we might be up in 2nd place this season since AVB's system is more effective than what Harry offered.
Also this stage last season we were on 59 points so we're only 1 point off. So I think AVB's done an effective job getting a less talented squad to the same place.