What's new

Chavs for sale

yanno

Well-Known Member
Aug 1, 2003
5,857
2,877
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/football/premier_league/chelsea/article3754622.ece


From The Times
April 16, 2008
Chelsea stars head for exit in fire sale by Abramovich


Chelsea are planning a mass clear-out of players at the end of the season, irrespective of what happens to Avram Grant. The Times has learnt that as many as ten first-team squad members could leave Stamford Bridge in what would be the most dramatic upheaval since the unprecedented summer of spending immediately after Roman Abramovich bought the club five years ago.

Grant and Abramovich are united in the belief that Chelsea’s squad needs a substantial overhaul if the club are to win trophies, although whether the first-team coach will be around to undertake the process is unclear. Abramovich would like to give Grant at least one full season to prove his worth, partially in the hope that it would justify his controversial decision to dismiss José Mourinho in September, but the owner’s reaction will be governed by results.

With many fans openly hostile and some players privately unconvinced, Grant’s position remains precarious, although taking Chelsea to the Champions League final for the first time would be enough for him to soldier on.

Grant is understood to be confident of keeping his job and has begun planning for the future, with Abramovich ready to release substantial funds to buy world-class players. The Israeli considers the squad he inherited to be unsuited to his requirements and several players have been told that they can move on.

Andriy Shevchenko, Claudio Pizarro, Steve Sidwell and Tal Ben-Haim will be put up for sale, with the futures of more established players such as Florent Malouda, Shaun Wright-Phillips, Carlo Cudicini and Juliano Belletti uncertain. With Didier Drogba, Frank Lampard and Wayne Bridge unsettled, the number of departures could reach double figures.

Chelsea’s biggest problem is likely to be finding clubs willing to match the wages they pay to fringe players, some of whom have lengthy contracts, while the heavy losses they will have to accept on transfer fees will hit their hopes of reaching their break-even target by 2010. Shevchenko, for example, is worth only a fraction of the £30 million Chelsea paid for him in 2006 and the only clubs to have expressed an interest are Dynamo Kiev and AC Milan, although several Major League Soccer franchises would also take him for a knockdown price. A loan agreement may be the only way to get the Ukraine striker off the wage bill.

Sidwell, Ben-Haim, Wright-Phillips and Cudicini should be easier to sell to Premier League clubs, but the same cannot be said of Malouda, Belletti and Pizarro, who are less than 12 months into lucrative four-year deals.

Drogba would command a high fee if Chelsea fail to alter his determination to find a fresh challenge elsewhere, although Lampard’s resale value is falling all the time while his contract talks are on hold. The England midfield player was excused training yesterday as he spent the time with his ill mother in hospital and is unlikely to travel for tomorrow’s match away to Everton.
 

yanno

Well-Known Member
Aug 1, 2003
5,857
2,877
So much for the continuity of playing staff ensured by a Director of Football management structure.

What is the world's finest DoF, Frank Arnensen, doing at Chavski nowadays?
 

Real_madyidd

The best username, unless you are a fucking idiot.
Oct 25, 2004
18,797
12,456
So much for the continuity of playing staff ensured by a Director of Football management structure.

What is the world's finest DoF, Frank Arnensen, doing at Chavski nowadays?

He isn't the DOF. He is something like "Head of Youth Development". He has a smaller job than at Spurs, and more pay. So kinda makes your point, well, err, pointless.
- No insult meant mate, just pointing out that he isn't the DOF (in fact I think Grant was DOF???)
 

donny1013

Well-Known Member
Nov 4, 2005
5,646
946
Florent Malouda was always going to need a season to adapt, but i think he came because of Mourinho and Drogba anyway. With the players mr.toad has at his disposal, i cant believe that he thinks they cant play fast flowing football??!!
 

yanno

Well-Known Member
Aug 1, 2003
5,857
2,877
He isn't the DOF. He is something like "Head of Youth Development". He has a smaller job than at Spurs, and more pay. So kinda makes your point, well, err, pointless.
- No insult meant mate, just pointing out that he isn't the DOF (in fact I think Grant was DOF???)

No offence, (or insult), taken. :wink:

Arnensen's role at Chavski has always been pretty murky. The initial reports (when they poached him from us) all suggested that Abramovich felt Mourinho was ignoring him, so he wanted to bring in a world class DoF (with a CV that Mourinho had no choice but to respect) to curb Jose's wings. Mourinho refused to accept this, so rather than being Chavski's "Sporting Director", Arnensen ended up with the title of "Head of Youth Development". Whatever the truth of what went on behind closed doors, £5 million is a lot to pay to poach an academy chief scout....

You're correct that when Grant was appointed, he was formally given the title of DoF. He's now coach, and he seems to be telling Abramovich that the squad (that he partially assembled) isn't good enough and he needs to sell a dozen or so of them. An objective observer might ask why he doesn't play Joe Cole if Malouda is on the "for sale" list.

Anyway, my broader point is that I don't think - from the Spurs perspective - that a DoF ensures continuity of playing staff. And regardless of the precise identity of Chavski's DoF, they have had a DoF for the past couple of seasons and now they seem intent on changing half their squad.
 

Has1978

Well-Known Member
Jul 15, 2005
1,058
37
No offence, (or insult), taken. :wink:

Arnensen's role at Chavski has always been pretty murky. The initial reports (when they poached him from us) all suggested that Abramovich felt Mourinho was ignoring him, so he wanted to bring in a world class DoF (with a CV that Mourinho had no choice but to respect) to curb Jose's wings. Mourinho refused to accept this, so rather than being Chavski's "Sporting Director", Arnensen ended up with the title of "Head of Youth Development". Whatever the truth of what went on behind closed doors, £5 million is a lot to pay to poach an academy chief scout....

You're correct that when Grant was appointed, he was formally given the title of DoF. He's now coach, and he seems to be telling Abramovich that the squad (that he partially assembled) isn't good enough and he needs to sell a dozen or so of them. An objective observer might ask why he doesn't play Joe Cole if Malouda is on the "for sale" list.

Anyway, my broader point is that I don't think - from the Spurs perspective - that a DoF ensures continuity of playing staff. And regardless of the precise identity of Chavski's DoF, they have had a DoF for the past couple of seasons and now they seem intent on changing half their squad.

or management for that matter. Exactly what it was meant to provide - continuity - it has abjectly failed to do.

As for the Chav players, I'd take any of their midfield in a second - and chuck in Drogba, Alex and Cech! :razz:
 
Top