- Jan 29, 2018
- 3,928
- 18,702
Not necessarily - if we wait til the last moment it may not matter anyways. At the current rate I’m struggling to see us sign more than 1 player, if even that.Guess it all comes down to if Atletico move for Højbjerg.
Not necessarily - if we wait til the last moment it may not matter anyways. At the current rate I’m struggling to see us sign more than 1 player, if even that.Guess it all comes down to if Atletico move for Højbjerg.
This is my personal main reason for not loving this deal. It's definitely petty and maybe straying into "cutting off one's nose to spite one's face" territory, but I don't want us to do anything that helps Chelsea out with their FFP model.It’s not a favour. It massively helps their FFP.
Us selling Hojbjerg and then the chavs fucking us last minute on Gallagher is pretty transparent.
I think we would loan Hojbjerg only after getting this done as a loan can be done quickly.Us selling Hojbjerg and then the chavs fucking us last minute on Gallagher is pretty transparent.
He is in he who shall be named’s first XI at the moment. They are definitely fucking with us.Us selling Hojbjerg and then the chavs fucking us last minute on Gallagher is pretty transparent.
New owners, all the old lot cleared out, so I imagine all that bad blood between the old board and our board doesn't exist anymore.no way chelsea do business with us
Quick update: We've started talks with Chelsea for Gallagher tonight. They're looking at 45 million plus potential add-ons, pending Hojbjerg's departure. The discussions are ongoing and haven't progressed significantly yet. Deal in stage unlikely right now
This guy is respected by Chelsea fans