yawa
Well-Known Member
- Aug 9, 2005
- 12,592
- 9,417
That would imply Poch has any input into what Boehly is doing with transfers.
Conor Gallagher
- Thread starter THFCSPURS19
- Start date
That would imply Poch has any input into what Boehly is doing with transfers.
Mattspurs1982
Well-Known Member
- Aug 2, 2011
- 3,046
- 7,130
He might not be the most polished world beater but I am loving this young, energetic theme we’re building. The average age of the squad now is something like 24 with a tonne of potential, passion, points to prove and stamina. CG fits right into this. Fingers crossed….
cookiemonster
Well-Known Member
- Dec 29, 2005
- 2,739
- 5,880
Looks like we left it too late as usual
Like all these it’s lost in how the add ons work. We probably want 35-40 + 5 and they probably want 40-45+ 5.
I’d be shocked if there isn’t a deal to be done in that range.
just need PEH to point and yell for ATL Madrid to get off their asses and move.
Nick-TopSpursMan
Well-Known Member
- Aug 4, 2005
- 4,169
- 20,059
The club trained rule only applies for European competition though, not for the PL at least.
For Europe though you’re spot on, we need to make sure we have club trained players.
spursfan77
Well-Known Member
- Aug 13, 2005
- 46,687
- 104,969
Do we really need to sell Pierre to afford him?
I suspect it is more to do with numbers.
I think Hojbjerg will go, but I dont see why Gallagher would want to join us.
I suspect it is more to do with numbers.
I think Hojbjerg will go, but I dont see why Gallagher would want to join us.
Ghost Hardware
Well-Known Member
- Aug 31, 2012
- 18,433
- 63,509
I don’t think it’s a money thing. Def a squad size issue. Fact is if we got him and kept PEH we would be very bloated in CM without any cup games.
Plus last chance to get a decent fee for hojberg
Clark28
Well-Known Member
- Aug 31, 2016
- 2,270
- 13,043
I'm loving angles instead.
spursfan77
Well-Known Member
- Aug 13, 2005
- 46,687
- 104,969
He's just not suited to us at all now and needs to go. I've never really been a fan but appreciate he tries hard.
That's why I think he will go. Next summer teams arent going to offer half of what they are offering now.
Richard Howlett
Member
- Jun 3, 2012
- 33
- 51
Agreed, think we have plenty of room with FFP. It's a numbers game
JamieSpursCommunityUser
Well-Known Member
- Jan 27, 2011
- 1,903
- 10,050
That’s true short term, and we also have one more year of Sarr and Udogie U21 in PL.
But we have to be building the squad for Europe.
I think we are. You can see pretty clearly a world where Davies, Forster and Sess are moved on in next year or two. Maddison, Johnson, Gallagher and CB a pretty good association trained 4 going forward.
would be great to get real clarification on Sarr. I think he’s screwed in Europe due to stupid loophole about start of season vs registration deadline, but would be nice to know for.
we should be keeping close eye on Cirkin as LB cover. He’s developing nicely at Sunderland.
Montalbano
Well-Known Member
- Jan 29, 2018
- 3,928
- 18,703
Just get rid of Skipp too to make sure this happens. He’ll barely see the pitch if we sign Gallagher and once Bentancur returns
THFCSPURS19
The Speaker of the Transfer Rumours Forum
- Jan 6, 2013
- 37,894
- 130,529
- Thread starter
- #1,095
I mean this window proves we can't just 'get rid' of players.
neogenisis
*Gensy*
- Jun 27, 2006
- 5,932
- 13,452
Chelsea Fans -
It should though, we are directly competing with them, and they would not sell to us if the shoe was on the other foot.
Spurs price should be £70m+
Seriously f**k spurs, and f**k Levy.
If it was Villa or Everton, I'd be disappointed at this stage given his start, but we are strengthening a massive rival. Spurs look good this season too, not that much of a stretch to say Gallagher going there could be the difference between us and them for the last Champions League spot.
I'm hoping it breaks down at some point. Would rather lose him for less money in January to someone else.
Seriously f**king Tottenham.
Thing is, we’re signing all of these random kids who I bet won’t make the first team. It’s just shiny new toys.
Trev and Conor are worth their place in the squad. They’re good enough to be at Chelsea.
Really hope we don’t sell Conor. There’s no need to. And especially not to Spurs.
Spurs aren't seen as our direct rivals....
Man United
Arsenal
Liverpool
Those are the teams we have been tussling with for nearly 2 decades now.
The club won't see spurs as a club we cannot deal with for the same reasons as fans, just doesn't happen.
Shouldn't even sell him in general let alone sell him to Spurs.
Really don't want us to sell Connor. Lad has really grown on me. Not least for his spoken and demonstrated love for the club.
Poch has had him playing every game so far and he's been a stand out performer in every one, i'd be very concerned if the board starts selling players that Poch clearly prefers.
This one would annoy me.
Not too bothered about Chalobah and even Maatsen (don't think he's defensively good enough for LB nor attackingly strong enough for the front areas) but there's literally no need to sell a player who will die for this club and is improving by the game to Spurs of all teams.
Hopefully he does a JT and refuse to move.
Ridiculous when they have agreed to pay 45mi for Johnson.
We must be desperate for cash at such prices. His minimum should be 50mill in this market, plus 10mill Spurs tax.
Above all we should not be selling him.
As an aside a few people on that forum are saying if he goes its against Pochs wishes.
It should though, we are directly competing with them, and they would not sell to us if the shoe was on the other foot.
Spurs price should be £70m+
Seriously f**k spurs, and f**k Levy.
If it was Villa or Everton, I'd be disappointed at this stage given his start, but we are strengthening a massive rival. Spurs look good this season too, not that much of a stretch to say Gallagher going there could be the difference between us and them for the last Champions League spot.
I'm hoping it breaks down at some point. Would rather lose him for less money in January to someone else.
Seriously f**king Tottenham.
Thing is, we’re signing all of these random kids who I bet won’t make the first team. It’s just shiny new toys.
Trev and Conor are worth their place in the squad. They’re good enough to be at Chelsea.
Really hope we don’t sell Conor. There’s no need to. And especially not to Spurs.
Spurs aren't seen as our direct rivals....
Man United
Arsenal
Liverpool
Those are the teams we have been tussling with for nearly 2 decades now.
The club won't see spurs as a club we cannot deal with for the same reasons as fans, just doesn't happen.
Shouldn't even sell him in general let alone sell him to Spurs.
Really don't want us to sell Connor. Lad has really grown on me. Not least for his spoken and demonstrated love for the club.
Poch has had him playing every game so far and he's been a stand out performer in every one, i'd be very concerned if the board starts selling players that Poch clearly prefers.
This one would annoy me.
Not too bothered about Chalobah and even Maatsen (don't think he's defensively good enough for LB nor attackingly strong enough for the front areas) but there's literally no need to sell a player who will die for this club and is improving by the game to Spurs of all teams.
Hopefully he does a JT and refuse to move.
Ridiculous when they have agreed to pay 45mi for Johnson.
We must be desperate for cash at such prices. His minimum should be 50mill in this market, plus 10mill Spurs tax.
Above all we should not be selling him.
As an aside a few people on that forum are saying if he goes its against Pochs wishes.
wrd
Well-Known Member
- Aug 22, 2014
- 13,603
- 58,005
I think opinion on this transfer comes down to your preference on signings.
Are you happy accepting players who are better than the depth we have, but below the level of the first 11. Alternatively you may prefer to try and sign players of superior quality to the first 11 and push those players to the bench, whilst also acquiring young players with high ceilings (Like Sarr). I'm in the latter camp personally but I do appreciate that having young English players when you're building the foundations of your team can prove hugely beneficial. I just wish we developed them instead of bought them.
Are you happy accepting players who are better than the depth we have, but below the level of the first 11. Alternatively you may prefer to try and sign players of superior quality to the first 11 and push those players to the bench, whilst also acquiring young players with high ceilings (Like Sarr). I'm in the latter camp personally but I do appreciate that having young English players when you're building the foundations of your team can prove hugely beneficial. I just wish we developed them instead of bought them.
worcestersauce
"I'm no optimist I'm just a prisoner of hope
- Jan 23, 2006
- 26,967
- 45,257
That's the spirit spursfan77!
Maybe he feels we've got a successful future ahead of us.
SandroClegane
Well-Known Member
- Jun 27, 2012
- 3,717
- 13,842
Hate to see it! Really hoping this happens now
Similar threads
