- Jul 17, 2008
- 14,852
- 20,661
What's interesting from that snippet is that it would lead you to, realistically imo, believe that there is a set budget/figure we are playing with...now not knowing what that figure is, nor can I be bothered converting dollars into euros or into pounds, I'm wondering whether in combining two pieces of itk/poster info we may get some direction of what is being planned.
There was a snippet yesterday from a (respected) poster from FTL, saying Pleat had said Villa was 'option B'....could it be Demaio was option A, and if to expensive, using the budget for him to get Villa and Bernard? Pretty sure Demaio was being quoted at 23m last season in pounds, well Villa is being touted at 10m to 12m pounds, and Bernard is being touted at roughly 10m pounds...might be the scenario....could also tie in with another itk which stated 2 big names and 4 quality youngsters (or something like that)..could Villa be one of those big names, and Bernard one of those 4 quality youngsters?
Any considered views ?
We'd certainly have a budget to stick to, and getting so many players out of it depends on the deals we can do and the prices we can get. I'm guessing the budget is one big sum that factors into it wages over the course of the contract plus add-ons.
What I'm not convinced of is that we'd be looking at a situation of option A being Damiao, and option B being Villa and Bernard. For a start if that were the case I'd much rather option B to option A. Two quality players, one young for the longer term and one older for the short term is a great deal. It may not be a case of A being preferrential to B. It could be a case of option A is Damiao and (just to pluck a player out) Pjanic, and option B is an alternative of Villa and Bernard due to the fact that they'd possibly work out at the same cost. The obstacle being if Pjanic and Villa are unobtainable and trying to get Damiao and Bernard to fit the budget instead, or vice versa.