Nah, when you paid thousands of pounds to watch players like Eric Dier shit up your team on a weekly basis you don't feel like moderating your language.
In reality though saying he's a shit footballer is hardly the worst thing, i've gone into more detail explaining why his technical aspects are not up to scruff but nobody wants to read that. They just want to respond to the idea hes bad with 'OMG he's been loyal for years, i mean nobody has wanted to buy him but hes been so loyal, hes a good guy who doesn't fall out of nightclubs, he play for England a bunch when they were terrible and yes he just like so reasonable, Son was bad too, lets try to coach him up'
He is a bad player, hes been bad for quite a while. You pay 1k a year to watch him fuck around it's upsetting. I have no problem with people getting upset with him online or at games, you play for a big team and you underperform it's what's gonna happen.
I just assume its because its summer, far from first xi games and there is some Ange optimism going around that people are allowing the idea that Dier being in the squad is a good thing but it isn't.
You've had it explained to you a number of times now why posters object to the language you use about Dier. Why not try reflecting a bit on that rather than getting so defensive and doubling down on it.
Because your responses are just coming across as a perfect example of the toxic entitlement that we see nowadays in many fans. Paying money doesn't give anyone the right to use insulting language and abuse players.
No one has said you have to like Dier. You've just been asked not to insult him. That's a pretty reasonable request i think.