- Oct 1, 2005
- 9,169
- 28,675
Sorry but it is miles off - if one or two of their attackers get injured there is little or no drop in quality for the players that come in. For us if Kane or Kulusevski get injured you are left with Richarlison (will be good but not yet there), Son (utterly useless at the moment), Gil (terrible) or Lucas (terrible). It's not good at all and in no way compares favorably to Liverpool.It's not miles off to be honest.
Kane and Son have been world class for years , Kulu is fantastic and Rich is Brazil's number 9.
Granted, Gil and Lucas aren't good enough, but you're acting like our front line is a joke. Realistically, we're 1 more top forward away from having very solid front line depth - and last season many thought our attack was the best in the entire league.
You can't say our depth is bad then use the perennially injured Ox and an unproven 20 year old as examples of Liverpool's wealth of attacking depth when they have similar injuries.
We are however, severely lacking an alternative to Kulusevski as we're so desperate for creativity when he's not in the side and Kane's not getting on the ball.