What's new

F.A. Cup 2017/18

easley91

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2011
19,097
54,818
Please. Get a grip. Seriously??? I'm all for not being arrogant n' all that. But, seriously??? :confused:
Yes seriously. Takes one off day and we’re out. I fully expect us to go through, however it won’t be as easy as people think. The lower league sides are more often than not bang up for these ties. United won’t have it easy either.
 

Marty

Audere est farce
Mar 10, 2005
40,193
63,991
Love the draw but Newport have a famously shit pitch. Critical that we don't get injuries to key players on that surface.
 

coys200

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2017
8,436
17,403
Love the draw but Newport have a famously shit pitch. Critical that we don't get injuries to key players on that surface.
Big dilemma for poch with united 3 days later and then Liverpool arsenal. Big guns on bench for me if needed.
 

ikky

Well-Known Member
Dec 6, 2006
9,011
21,503
39991F42-4502-4D30-803A-02E1DA7B3A0B.jpeg
 

mark87

Well-Known Member
Nov 29, 2004
36,269
115,385
Bloody hell, BT trying their hardest to make sure the game ends in controversy saying the Murray goal was handball, it fucking well wasn't.
 

tiger666

Large Member
Jan 4, 2005
27,978
82,216
Bloody hell, BT trying their hardest to make sure the game ends in controversy saying the Murray goal was handball, it fucking well wasn't.

Get VAR in to end some controversy, make stuff up to generate some controversy.
 

Hazardousman

Audere est Facere
Jul 24, 2013
4,619
8,944
Get VAR in to end some controversy, make stuff up to generate some controversy.

What I don't understand is, if the ref can refuse to view the VAR then what is the point in having it in the first place?

On the match report it reads "Referee Andre Marriner did not see the need to refer to VAR as Murray steered the ball in from close range despite Palace's calls for handball (87)"

Well, doesn't that kind of you know, defeat the whole purpose of VAR? If the ref can just outright refuse to use it then it's pretty fucking pointless lol.

I think each manager should have 3 challenges to refer to VAR throughout a match, even if the official disagrees, then after those 3 challenges VAR can only be used by the official at their discretion, I think that would make it fair.
 

mark87

Well-Known Member
Nov 29, 2004
36,269
115,385
What I don't understand is, if the ref can refuse to view the VAR then what is the point in having it in the first place?

On the match report it reads "Referee Andre Marriner did not see the need to refer to VAR as Murray steered the ball in from close range despite Palace's calls for handball (87)"

Well, doesn't that kind of you know, defeat the whole purpose of VAR? If the ref can just outright refuse to use it then it's pretty fucking pointless lol.

I think each manager should have 3 challenges to refer to VAR throughout a match, even if the official disagrees, then after those 3 challenges VAR can only be used by the official at their discretion, I think that would make it fair.

The ref was obviously very sure it didn't hit Murray's arm and didn't allow himself to get swayed by the palace protests.
 
Top