- Jun 2, 2011
- 13,501
- 57,356
Tbf his main asset is pace and I literally cannot think of a single Everton player, let alone forward who I would call pacey
Bolasie?
Tbf his main asset is pace and I literally cannot think of a single Everton player, let alone forward who I would call pacey
This Walcott transfer just highlights how well our club is being run.
We had already sold Bale for the world's highest transfer fee so many seasons ago and, despite Walcott and Bale were moved on from Southampton at the same time, and Walcott is still mediocre by scum standard for such a long 10, 12 years!
Then we have Everton who are spending silly money in the last summer but could well be flirting with relegation if not for big Sam coming in to rescue them when big profile managers are what they wanted. Not to mention Walcott again, another past-the-prime players of stupid wages who Everton actually think is worth signing!
How I wish along the context of such, we can have this progression of improvement of our club being amplified in media all over, as a role model for really ambitious clubs to look upon to. And not those caps that consistently underlined our stars had no intention to stay due to low wages ffs.
Lookman. Who I think is ideal for us. Gareth Southgate should take him to Russia.Tbf his main asset is pace and I literally cannot think of a single Everton player, let alone forward who I would call pacey
Tbf his main asset is pace and I literally cannot think of a single Everton player, let alone forward who I would call pacey
if theo had been working under poch in his prime he would be a bloody star....wasted talent
And so endeth his stellar career with the Arseholes of WoolwichWalcott confirmed
If it’s all about the money for Sanchez why doesn’t he sit tight until the summer? Have the goons said they won’t play him?
Prediction: He'll do next to nothing, will be let go for free at the end of his contract (or earlier) and his next club after Everton will be lower league.Walcott confirmed
City baulked at his wage demands I guess.
Walcott is a very 'straight lines' player. I don't think Poch likes or does well with those sorts of attacking players. Guardiola though would have given him tactical direction and better understanding of his role.
Shame he'll be working under Allardyce then
As said, Bolasie, and Calvert-Lewin.Tbf his main asset is pace and I literally cannot think of a single Everton player, let alone forward who I would call pacey
Walcott would have been a better player under Poch/Guardiola for sure, had this argument the other day with a Gooner and I mentioned Raheem Sterling and how are he was when he started to play for Liverpool compared to now he is now and the difference is that he's been coached properly and not been allowed to coast. I feel the same thing would have happened had Theo been coached and nurtured, he would be a far better player as he would have been pushed to higher levels.
I think Walcott does have talent. Apart from his pace, he’s always been a good finisher, finding bottom corners with nice crisp strikes. The problem is he was never an elite player, at a time when Arsenal had plenty of them. And Wenger never really knew what to do with him. If he’d have gone to a more middling club earlier and played off a big, strong centre forward, he’d probably have been a very regular goal scorer over the years.All due respect, but that's apples and oranges. Sterling has always had bags of talent since a very early age. He's always been miles ahead of Walcott in every aspect except pace. He went through a bad patch which could be down to all kinds of factors, but there's never been any question of his technical ability. Walcott on the other hand has never shown much technical ability or exceptional talent at all. Like I said in my other post, I think he was just overhyped because he was able to destroy academy sides due to his pace, but once he was playing against better opposition he was found out to be a pretty average player otherwise.