- Dec 3, 2010
- 4,129
- 23,698
I dont think it is an odd comparison currently due to as things stand/been reported:I get your point in theory, but that’s an odd comparison. Liverpool sold Coutinho (AM) and replaced him with VVD (CB) and Alisson (GK).
If we sold Kane and bought a high calibre striker that would be the opposite of what Liverpool did. They used the money to upgrade other areas of the team.
Would us replacing Kane with a young forward and ploughing the main money into someone like Tapsoba to cover an area of pressing need, not be a similar scenario to Liverpool ?
We are selling Kane and we are bringing in a young CB (VDV) with lots of potential but not one that is proven enough currently for anyone to feel confident he will improve our back line. Potentially 2 young CFs that have potential but nothing else currently.
If we go and get Tapsoba too I will be happy but he isnt at the level VVD was. Maddison is a great buy but the rest of the window so far is opportunistic buys (Soloman and Phillips and potentially Tosin if rumours are true) and players with potential but not proven (Vicario, VDV, Veliz).
Either way you look at it, we are gambling massively on players and Ange to get the best out of them. Lets all hope it pays off.
Last edited: