I agree but we intentionally asked for 80£ million up front that surely means we are going after more than 2/3 players in the 20/30 mill range.That's fair enough, and I also fear we'll spunk the money away. But there are two ways to approach the rebuild after a big sale. We can spend big, trying to replace Kane as like for like as possible, or we can try to spread the money into two or three players who in sum will have a bigger impact. And because Kane only had one year left on his deal and is 30, we got much less for him than he's actually worth. So if we spend all the money on a replacement striker, we'll be worse off.
Had we finished in the top 4 last season, I think a replacement like that would make more sense, but last season we ended up behind teams with no Kane. In general, the success of Newcastle, Brighton and Villa have shown that coaching and a strong squad will take you a long way.
There's a lot of talk about investment on this board, and that's exactly what I think we should do with the Kane money. You don't invest in something that's peaking. You invest in things that are on their way up. We have to rebuild and accept that it's going to take a bit of time. And to not derail too much from topic, I think Orban is a perfect signing in that regard.
Vlahovic for example is rumoured to be around 60/80 million euros. We could add him, the torino CB and Olise and not be ridiculous over the Kane money total.