- Jan 8, 2021
- 1,020
- 4,111
And Waspish is still going on about us needing money to pay our tax bill ??BM seems to be torn between "we won a game so we don't need him", and being convinced it's done and everything else is PR gamesmanship.
And Waspish is still going on about us needing money to pay our tax bill ??BM seems to be torn between "we won a game so we don't need him", and being convinced it's done and everything else is PR gamesmanship.
According to sky he has travelled up to wolves with the squad. You don’t involve someone who is distracted and therefore a distraction. This is positive (for those who want to keep him)
Edmonton:
I’ve been told if City come in with a real £150m bid he’s still gone, good news is there is no sign of that.
Wasn’t £150m what would get us to the table? Hoping we want a lot more than that!Edmonton:
I’ve been told if City come in with a real £150m bid he’s still gone, good news is there is no sign of that.
Wasn’t £150m what would get us to the table? Hoping we want a lot more than that!
Because uncertainty destabilizes the team. The sooner we can get a settled squad the better.
Edit: Don't know why destabilizes is bold
Edmonton:
I’ve been told if City come in with a real £150m bid he’s still gone, good news is there is no sign of that.
I am but I think its important to let it play out until the window closes.Anyone else worried we sell Kane for 150 million next week and don't replace with two quality attackers? I don't see who we can buy.
It just feels like if City meet our valuation, Kane is gone regardless of what state that leaves us on the pitch, and if that's the case, it's a scandal.
Anyone else worried we sell Kane for 150 million next week and don't replace with two quality attackers? I don't see who we can buy.
It just feels like if City meet our valuation, Kane is gone regardless of what state that leaves us on the pitch, and if that's the case, it's a scandal.
Triple S is
Triple S communications.
This is the scenario we’re dreading, isn’t it? It’s also the scenario we know is going to most likely happen: sell Kane at the very last minute and not have time to reinvest with a quality replacementEdmonton:
I’ve been told if City come in with a real £150m bid he’s still gone, good news is there is no sign of that.
Yeah, Glenn Hoddle in BT score saying he thinks it will be done in the early part of next week.
Anyone else worried we sell Kane for 150 million next week and don't replace with two quality attackers? I don't see who we can buy.
It just feels like if City meet our valuation, Kane is gone regardless of what state that leaves us on the pitch, and if that's the case, it's a scandal.
This is the scenario we’re dreading, isn’t it? It’s also the scenario we know is going to most likely happen: sell Kane at the very last minute and not have time to reinvest with a quality replacement
Problem is, would you out it past him? I know I have no confidence in that factI'm sorry but Levy just won't do that.
He's already on the ropes with the fanbase.