- Mar 21, 2007
- 6,690
- 8,040
Do you think he'll get the service he needs?
Nope. But then it depends on the way Poch sets us up.
Do you think he'll get the service he needs?
I don't see why he'd have come here to sit on our bench and play the domestic cups though.I would have gone hard for chicharito.
Depends how it would have been sold to him by Poch.I don't see why he'd have come here to sit on our bench and play the domestic cups though.
Depends how it would have been sold to him by Poch.
Son plays the 9 role in a similar way to Chicharito so don't see how he would offer much.
Llorente is good in the air and can hold the ball up. Main question is whether we can adapt to his lack of mobility.
I have minor doubts over Llorente but believe he is a good option.
Alright, mate.
I can't have a sensible conversation with someone who says don't buy chicharito as a second striker because we've got son. Soz.Did you not see him play up front last season when he got player of the month for the entire league and scored around 4 goals in 5 games?
I can't have a sensible conversation with someone who says don't buy chicharito as a second striker because we've got son. Soz.
Mate there’s no need for the tone. You’ve actually offered a far more controversial opinion than he had and I don’t see anyone talking to you with such disrespect.I can't have a sensible conversation with someone who says don't buy chicharito as a second striker because we've got son. Soz.
Thanks for the chat.Apology accepted, if you haven't seen Son play well for us up front or for South Korea then I don't know what you've been watching.
If Chicharito is so good he wouldn't have gone to West Ham.
Nothing wrong with the tone of my post. Bowed out of the convo without slinging ad-hominems.Mate there’s no need for the tone. You’ve actually offered a far more controversial opinion than he had and I don’t see anyone talking to you with such disrespect.
Well just fucking kill me
If you asked, I’d say 70-80% of neutrals would rather start Son up front than Chicharito. It’s hardly a controversial opinion.Nothing wrong with the tone of my post. Bowed out of the convo without slinging ad-hominems.
Don't need faux righteous lectures. Cheers thanks.
I'm not concerned with neutrals. I'm concerned with what I think.If you asked, I’d say 70-80% of neutrals would rather start Son up front than Chicharito. It’s hardly a controversial opinion.
If you asked, I’d say 70-80% of neutrals would rather start Son up front than Chicharito. It’s hardly a controversial opinion.
Just throw me into traffic or off the Empire State BuildingDo I need to say it was self defence?