- Jul 9, 2011
- 7,230
- 23,882
1) of course, but then people can’t say “we failed Kane”. It was a job to him, nothing more, and we shouldn’t feel we owed him anything.2 important points here. 1). It’s not Harry’s job to have our interests in mind but it is levy’s and more importantly 2) catastrophic mismanagement of the club over a period of years that leads to you being forced to either sell your best ever player or lose them for nothing in a year whilst simultaneously falling to clear out the squad and refusing to reinvest the proceeds as a result isn’t really in the best interests of spurs is it?
2) we’ve spent loads in recent years and bloated the squad signing managers and their targets specifically to succeed with Kane.