- Aug 9, 2010
- 1,995
- 5,663
Man City may well go all in for him. The crux comes, like it did for Gerrard can he bring himself to play against Spurs.
Man City may well go all in for him. The crux comes, like it did for Gerrard can he bring himself to play against Spurs.
Do they really need him though?
They don’t need to spend £150 million on one player to make their team better. It’s already the best in the country. Europe is where their problems lie and that’s a mentality thing. I still think they have a chance with Messi and even though he’d probably cost a fortune in wages, while Guardiola is there and the dream of reuniting them is possible I still think it’s the likeliest ploy with Haaland going there the following season when he’s a cheaper fee for them.
What a bizarre comparison. Gerrard had just won the European Cup and his club were regularly winning trophies. We have won 2 (yes 2) league cups in the last 3 decades!Man City may well go all in for him. The crux comes, like it did for Gerrard can he bring himself to play against Spurs.
If it wasn’t for Kane we wouldn’t have got into any of those positions / finals.
So have we all reached a point of acceptance in here?
Im not sure you understood my post. Will he be prepared to play against us is what im saying.What a bizarre comparison. Gerrard had just won the European Cup and his club were regularly winning trophies. We have won 2 (yes 2) league cups in the last 3 decades!
Yea completely get your point mate although he wasn't fit in the CL final for example, but yea get the point.How many minutes of the Knockout stages did Kane play in the run to the final before he then came in and played the final and did the grand sum of fuck all? I love the bloke I really do but I have always hated the move to win narrative from any clubs point of view. If you are so great then why do you need trophies handed to you on a platter at one of a few clubs guaranteed to win them. The glory is actually showing up to a final with Spurs or a top of the table clash and doing the business against the odds. Jaime Vardys title at Leicester is far more impressive than anything Mahrez wins at city.
Don't think it was about Kane specifically tbh and he went round Poch's house the next day and was very close to him.Wasn't there ITK at the time of Poch's sacking indicating that Kane wanted him gone? Something along the lines of senior players - hinted to be Kane - who had reached the end of the road with Poch and would leave if he stayed on. If it's true, would be surprised to see him end up there.
He’s a professional player after all so yes I think he is and you can bet your ass he will want that goal when he does play against us (probably won’t celebrate)Im not sure you understood my post. Will he be prepared to play against us is what im saying.
Kane is a certified goal scorer he will make any team better.
So have we all reached a point of acceptance in here?
Of course. But do they need him when they can get Haaland in a year's time for half the cost and have a player under contract for potentially the next decade?
Not me.
We have one season to convince him to stay. All the more imperative that we get the right manager in. Odds are that even a good first season might not be enough but Harry leaving is not inevitable yet.
Possibly he hasnt signed that new contract yetI think Kane will stay and Son leave
It's going to be really difficult for a new manager to hit the ground running next season. If we get Nagelsmann in he's not going to have much time to coach our players with the Euros this Summer and I don't see how we're going to improve without massive investment in our defence.
Even if we sold kane for a massive fee we’d still need to shift at least another 5 players for any rebuild to take place and I’m not confident of that happening this summer