What's new

Harry Kane

Tiberius Gracchus

Well-Known Member
Jan 22, 2004
746
1,822
20210519_100947.jpg


I've brought this with me to wave at him tonight. If anything can convince him to stay, it's this
 

yiddopaul

Well-Known Member
Dec 28, 2005
3,453
6,743
He isn't going anywhere unless we receive the right bid. I hope he gets MOTM tonight and then they ask him straight up in the interview. See what answers he gives
Doesn't matter what they ask him. He'll have been told exactly what to say. IMO, he is going this summer. And I think he should. I don't want him to, but he absolutely deserves it. He will never win a trophy with us. City is the only club in England where he can guaranty success. I wish it were abroad, and it makes me feel nauseous seeing him in another PL shirt, but we should not stand in his way. We'll survive, we've lost top players before – Hoddle the last one that made me feel sad, but there'll be other stars and heroes in the future. My biggest concern is having the right people making the right decisions on where to invest the money.
 

George94

George
Feb 1, 2015
3,689
19,518
Personally I'd make City add another £50m on top of any offer they make for Kane. First of all because they have the money, secondly because they refused to allow Sancho join us in the Walker deal.
 

Maxtremist

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2014
1,531
3,300
Man City feel like the only team with the finances able to buy Kane... but they also have never spent over £100m on a player. And call me somewhat optimistic but I just don't see them doing that with Kane? Haaland yeah because of age but if your City and the most you've spent on a player is £65 million, do you really spend £150+ on Kane? This summer of all summers?

I totally can believe Kane wants to go and don't begrudge him that, but I just can't see right now who makes sense both for money and trophy ambitions. Chelsea are by far no guarantee. Same with United. Liverpool maybe? But are they really gonna spend £150 on Kane? So that leaves City.
(Cause whilst outside of Europe is more likely for a trophy, I think we all kind of assume Kane wants Shearers record and isn't leaving the PL)
 

Jamturk

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2008
9,919
23,025
1 title with spurs would be a bigger achievment than 10 with oil city where he will be just another player.

I've been thinking this myself, going to Citeh and winning stuff ain't no great shakes, just a cog in a very expensive machine. I'd respect him more if he went to United and took them to the title.

Great players bring trophies.
 

Tucker

Shitehawk
Jul 15, 2013
31,403
147,091
Personally I'd make City add another £50m on top of any offer they make for Kane. First of all because they have the money, secondly because they refused to allow Sancho join us in the Walker deal.

I’d charge City a fee for even answering the phone to them.

“Oh they want to make an offer do they? Tell them it’ll cost them 50 million just for me to pick up the receiver, the oil drenched, financially doped scum bags.”
 

SpursSince1980

Well-Known Member
Jan 23, 2011
4,754
14,485
1- the little to no money is a constant
2- how often is a transitional season going to keep being used one of the most over used comments on here.
3- pandemic meh
4- Leicester also compete in that league and has just beaten one of those teams to win a trophy plus won a league in living memory.
And what’s your point?
 

McFlash

In the corner, eating crayons.
Oct 19, 2005
12,917
46,191
No. He gets lots of things right full stop. He calls lots of deals before anybody else. The evidence is out there for all to see.
I'd love to see a list of what he's got right before anyone else.
To me, he appears to pass comment on anything and everything but I don't recall him ever calling anything correctly off his own info. I do, however, recall him being miles off a few times.
He's all about quantity of information, not quality.
 
Top