sausage
?
- May 17, 2018
- 11,872
- 47,993
Almost completely convinced he goes to digs owned by ENIC or Tavistock when he does, so unlikely that it'd be undisclosed
Last edited:
Harry Kane
- Thread starter RichSpur58
- Start date
Almost completely convinced he goes to digs owned by ENIC or Tavistock when he does, so unlikely that it'd be undisclosed
Guernman
Well-Known Member
- Aug 24, 2013
- 1,525
- 7,895
I find it incredible just how badly Kane has been advised throughout this.
I remember being very surprised that he signed a 6 year contract, why do that? Pochettino had only just signed for 5 more years. At that point Harry held all the cards, he should have signed for a maximum of 5 years and/or agreed a release clause.
And to now play the striking card before any reasonable bid has even been tabled is just beyond stupidity. I mean exactly what did he expect would happen here. Kane and Unable were the ones who put the £160 million figure out there in the first place with their post wedding Sun article, and City haven't even come close to talking that figure.
Have the club pampered him so much over the years that he thinks he can just call the shots and we'll roll over? From the original contract, the Neville interview, the Sun article and now this petulant and completely pointless strike, he has literally taken the stupidest option at every juncture throughout this whole saga.
I get that this is a frustrating situation for him, but he may have to start coming to terms with the fact that City just may not want him that much.
I remember being very surprised that he signed a 6 year contract, why do that? Pochettino had only just signed for 5 more years. At that point Harry held all the cards, he should have signed for a maximum of 5 years and/or agreed a release clause.
And to now play the striking card before any reasonable bid has even been tabled is just beyond stupidity. I mean exactly what did he expect would happen here. Kane and Unable were the ones who put the £160 million figure out there in the first place with their post wedding Sun article, and City haven't even come close to talking that figure.
Have the club pampered him so much over the years that he thinks he can just call the shots and we'll roll over? From the original contract, the Neville interview, the Sun article and now this petulant and completely pointless strike, he has literally taken the stupidest option at every juncture throughout this whole saga.
I get that this is a frustrating situation for him, but he may have to start coming to terms with the fact that City just may not want him that much.
Hazelton
Unknown Member
- Jul 11, 2011
- 5,696
- 19,827
Imagine riding your brother's coat tails and piggybacking on his success your entire life.He has a fake oil spill on his desk. I'm dying ?
And he has pictures of every one of his clients on the wall behind him ?
Aphex
Well-Known Member
- Jan 30, 2021
- 6,287
- 33,052
mil1lion
This is the place to be
- May 7, 2004
- 42,604
- 78,297
Don't kid yourself, if City were I for him he would likely go there. Its just the nature of the beast, most top players want the top clubs. Kane is jusy another who became world class and wants to move on. The same would happen with the likes of Romero later down the road if he turns world class and we still dont win anything. The cycle will always continue until we start to win titles and even then we may still lose players.
It's only the approach Kane is taking I take exception too, not his reasons to want to leave.
Lily White Lady
Active SC Stalker
- Jan 2, 2015
- 299
- 1,057
I really hope Grealish stays at Villa. They have exiting project and he can be the main part of it. This would be interesting
And at this point I hope we sell Kane
Or we take the Kane money and buy Grealish ourselves plus £50m for a striker ?
doctor stefan Freud
the tired tread of sad biology
- Sep 2, 2013
- 15,170
- 72,170
I’m not kidding myself
McFlash
In the corner, eating crayons.
- Oct 19, 2005
- 12,950
- 46,407
He's really done a number on himself here, hasn't he?
Did he really think that Levy would let him go for 100m? If so, he really is daft.
He's the best striker out there and has 3 years left on his contract ffs. No way he's worth that little.
Donki
Has a "Massive Member" Member
- May 14, 2007
- 14,455
- 18,975
...
Blackcanary
Dame sans merci
- Jul 15, 2012
- 5,621
- 12,170
How is it possible that City ever thought they could get him for £100 million?! Did the Kanes suggest that would be enough?
Scott Spur
SC Supporter
- Aug 9, 2011
- 1,991
- 5,620
The dimwit brother leaked a £160M agreement to the Sun! What a plank.
McFlash
In the corner, eating crayons.
- Oct 19, 2005
- 12,950
- 46,407
Which would explain why they were pissed off when a drunken Charlie started blabbing about 160m at his wedding.
Gingernut
Well-Known Member
- Jul 2, 2019
- 1,423
- 3,518
Exactly. I remember in that Neville interview Kane mentioned a 100m. He obviously thinks that what he is worth and city have offered that. Ultimately, it isn't what Spurs value him at so he has to get on with it.
easley91
Well-Known Member
- Jan 27, 2011
- 19,127
- 54,886
It wasn't even an agreement. He was talking out of his ass (face in this case).
Gingernut
Well-Known Member
- Jul 2, 2019
- 1,423
- 3,518
My hunch is we will be talking about an unhappy Kane going to City in January
Col_M
Pointing out the Obvious
- Feb 28, 2012
- 22,786
- 45,888
neogenisis
*Gensy*
- Jun 27, 2006
- 5,933
- 13,453
Wait, my Dog is called Grealish. You know from when we should have signed him ><Have you tried selling him to man city?
