- May 12, 2005
- 702
- 980
dragon1 with some bad news on harry over on COYS
Well...you going to share it?
dragon1 with some bad news on harry over on COYS
I wonder if they would do that and let him know what the fan base really feel. "Are you Campbell in disguise?"
What kind of a dick tease is this?dragon1 with some bad news on harry over on COYS
He was almost certainly selfish in declaring himself fit but the real culprit is Poch who should have said fair enough but you’ll start on the bench. It’s Poch’s pandering to Kane that has led to his sense of self entitlement. The lack of game time back up strikers got because we allowed Kane to chase his personal goal scoring records is scandalous.
Campbell also got a large loyalty bonus from us when his contract ran out. So kane would be in appropriate company.The fact this looks like it's going to go through without him submitting a transfer request really irks me. Loyalty bonus after what he's done to try and push this through is a joke.
Sorry there’s no way you can say Kane was better than Bale. He never terrorized a team the way Bale did in both the Inter games. He never single handed won games week after week like Bale did in his final season before Madrid.Kanes an arsehole but some of the stuff I am reading on here. Completely in denial. He's the best player I've seen at Spurs in the last 20 years.
He's got us out of jail so many times, a machine.
We are unlikely to see something similar for a long time, thats the reality.
He's lost respect as a man but come on lets not underplay him as a footballer.
Just thinking - but if the stadium naming rights are tied to the Kane deal - that means that Spurs, Kane, and City have known for a while that this deal would go through - and these last couple of weeks have been one big charade by everyone...
dragon1 with some bad news on harry over on COYS
Did he break a nail?dragon1 with some bad news on harry over on COYS
more baldy bashing? post shifting?dragon1 with some bad news on harry over on COYS
I'm not sure why people think he would play on Sunday. regardless of the staus of any City transfer he's not match fit. He's not trained with us and it's been 5 weeks since he last kicked a ball. The same people saying he should play Sunday are the ones who complained about him starting the CL Final because he wasn't fully fit!!!!If he doesn't show up at all that's a huge indication he's already left and if he plays and risks injury that would infer no deal close to being finalised. I just thought being on the bench but not being called on to play would still keep people guessing and cover all bases. I do however understand your point of view.
sorry not being funny but don't understand your reasoning?Just thinking - but if the stadium naming rights are tied to the Kane deal - that means that Spurs, Kane, and City have known for a while that this deal would go through - and these last couple of weeks have been one big charade by everyone...
The very, very annoying kind.What kind of a dick tease is this?
dragon1 with some bad news on harry over on COYS
Just thinking - but if the stadium naming rights are tied to the Kane deal - that means that Spurs, Kane, and City have known for a while that this deal would go through - and these last couple of weeks have been one big charade by everyone...
dragon1 on COYS:
“things are not looking as rosy as they were earlier in the week
we felt he could well stay and sign a new deal.
we are trying to push things one way or the other over the coming days either he signs a bumper new deal or goes for 160 we may take Bernardo Silva as part of that deal
problem is neither of those two are live options and we are in total limbo, city knows they have done a number on Harry and his ill equipped agent they think the price will come down the more H and Charlie kicks”