What's new

Harry Kane

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,689
104,970


Seems like he’s talking from personal experience there. We also have no idea at all whether he is throwing his toys out the pram now at us or at Man City for not paying what we value him at. He may well be as realistic about the situation now as he was then for all we know.
 

Moonie

Whiteboards are remarkable
Jan 31, 2013
895
3,788
Hahaa BlueMoanies are now turning on their ITKs you can’t make it up, I really hope Levy keeps his resolve and shows them that they can’t get everything their way!
Bloody hell! Just seen that, one poster has pulled out 10 posts from an ITK all that were very VERY wrong. Oh dear ?
 

Gingernut

Well-Known Member
Jul 2, 2019
1,423
3,518
Hahaa BlueMoanies are now turning on their ITKs you can’t make it up, I really hope Levy keeps his resolve and shows them that they can’t get everything their way!

Supposed Bluemoon ITK has no idea what is going on:

1629446923813.png


Levy moving the goalposts? Never!
 
Last edited:

JeremyPaxton

Willing to play manager roulette
May 29, 2019
406
1,436
I can imagine Levy toughening his stance as it’s become apparent that Vlahovic and Martinez are going to be more difficult and/or expensive. In levy’s mind he might be only willing to sell Kane in order to buy Vlahovic, Martinez and be left with £20m beer money. The amount of money needed to do that has changed, which means Kane’s price needs to change. Airlines call this “dynamic pricing” ;) (ever noticed how if you keep searching for a flight the price goes up? Well, Citeh might be learning its the same with Strikers)
 

freeeki

Arsehole.
Aug 5, 2008
11,842
69,516
I think what’s becoming clear is that the only way we’re shifting our deadwood is if we take a financial hit on them, given how bloody awful many of them are.

Which means the only way this squad is getting rebuilt is if Kane leaves.

Tick tock, Levy.
 

stevensthfc

Well-Known Member
Nov 20, 2007
984
1,802
I can imagine Levy toughening his stance as it’s become apparent that Vlahovic and Martinez are going to be more difficult and/or expensive. In levy’s mind he might be only willing to sell Kane in order to buy Vlahovic, Martinez and be left with £20m beer money. The amount of money needed to do that has changed, which means Kane’s price needs to change. Airlines call this “dynamic pricing” ;) (ever noticed how if you keep searching for a flight the price goes up? Well, Citeh might be learning its the same with Strikers)
And they should know, they own an Airline :LOL:
 

THE SPURSBOY

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
2,062
4,234
If Kane doesn't go how his teammates going to take to him considering he's basically said they're not good enough to win anything Son and Dier have both posted something on social media taking digs back at him
 

rez9000

Any point?
Feb 8, 2007
11,942
21,098
I have actually just started watching it, and I hate how patronising the other people are towards Michael. That Jess laughing in the background? Professional that isn't it? Oh and Nuno has been in the job longer than a couple of weeks. Hate SSN. Why I stopped watching years ago.
What highlights how crap Sky's journalism is that Jess person using idiom incorrectly; she questions if Kane has changed 'tact', when the expression is to change 'tack'. Now, if a bod-on-the-street type uses an expression incorrectly, it's understandable; but a journalist's main tool is language and she can't even get a basic idiom right. All fur coat and no knickers with Sky - spectacle without substance.
 

easley91

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2011
19,129
54,892
If Kane doesn't go how his teammates going to take to him considering he's basically said they're not good enough to win anything Son and Dier have both posted something on social media taking digs back at him
As long as they can get the results on the pitch they can brawl in training as much as they like for all I care.
 

easley91

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2011
19,129
54,892
What highlights how crap Sky's journalism is that Jess person using idiom incorrectly; she questions if Kane has changed 'tact', when the expression is to change 'tack'. Now, if a bod-on-the-street type uses an expression incorrectly, it's understandable; but a journalist's main tool is language and she can't even get a basic idiom right. All fur coat and no knickers with Sky - spectacle without substance.
I actually thought it was tact. :cautious:
 
Top