canadacelt
Well-Known Member
- May 1, 2006
- 442
- 465
Harry on Anelka
- Thread starter canadacelt
- Start date
opensaysme
Banned
- May 31, 2011
- 811
- 4
Better than Pav. Winners mentality. Upgrade on PAV
smudger
Well-Known Member
- Jul 20, 2006
- 1,630
- 1,188
This.... Plus players Like him are 'Harry specials'
mpickard2087
Patient Zero
- Jun 13, 2008
- 21,900
- 32,611
Maybe, depends on how much he would cost. Cant see Chelsea dealing with us anyway.
jonathanhotspur
Loose Cannon
- Jun 28, 2009
- 10,292
- 8,250
Yes, I could see the sense in it.
Bus-Conductor
SC Supporter
- Oct 19, 2004
- 39,837
- 50,713
On a free we Could do a lot worse. More use in our squad than Pav or Defoe.
mano-obe
Well-Known Member
- Mar 2, 2005
- 4,302
- 7,590
Why is there always Spurs fans creating threads wanting declining players?
First it was Carrick, Berbatov, Drogba, Rio and now Anelka
If he's not good enough for Chelsea then why would he be good for us? We want to go up another level.
Almost as annoying as reading people say Wayne Bridge is the best LB in the premier league :rofl::rofl::rofl:
First it was Carrick, Berbatov, Drogba, Rio and now Anelka
If he's not good enough for Chelsea then why would he be good for us? We want to go up another level.
Almost as annoying as reading people say Wayne Bridge is the best LB in the premier league :rofl::rofl::rofl:
tttcowan
Well-Known Member
- Aug 12, 2005
- 2,792
- 3,295
Football is never that simple.
He'd be a defo yes for me, seems like exactly the type of player Harry gets the best out of and would be a great backup for ade... For those questioning his ability, have a look in his trophy cabinet, he's a winner.
Mr Pink
SC Supporter
- Aug 25, 2010
- 55,325
- 100,778
If most people thought like that there wouldn't be much activity in the transfer window. Different teams have varying needs and the make up of squads can be very different.
In this case Chelsea have an old squad and our top heavy with forwards. We on the other hand have a youngish squad and our light in the 'quality forward' department.
For half a season Anelka could be a very handy addition and in simple terms he could be of a lot more value to us than Chelsea so could well be worth considering.
joffmeister
SC Supporter
- Sep 12, 2008
- 66
- 0
Was thinking about possible striker signings for January the other week and came up with Anelka. He's the only striker I could think of that met all of the following criteria to be back-up to Adebayor:
i) able to play the lone striker role
ii) wouldn't expect to play every game
iii) proven in the Prem
iv) not rubbish
v) available in January
Not the greatest signing in the world, but fits our needs pretty well - we desperately need a player that can fill in for Ade if he gets injured, otherwise our title challenge(!) could be seriously derailed
i) able to play the lone striker role
ii) wouldn't expect to play every game
iii) proven in the Prem
iv) not rubbish
v) available in January
Not the greatest signing in the world, but fits our needs pretty well - we desperately need a player that can fill in for Ade if he gets injured, otherwise our title challenge(!) could be seriously derailed
Rout-Ledge
Well-Known Member
- Jul 29, 2005
- 9,682
- 21,874
Eek Didn't seem that way in the CL final
tttcowan
Well-Known Member
- Aug 12, 2005
- 2,792
- 3,295
He's got winners medals for,
2 Premier Leagues(2 Different Clubs)
3 FA Cups(2 Different Clubs)
1 Champions League
1 European Championship
^ Considering he's a bit of journeyman, that is a bloody impressive record at winning.
tttcowan
Well-Known Member
- Aug 12, 2005
- 2,792
- 3,295
His agent has already come out and said he'll go to whoever pays him the most.
Similar threads
