- Apr 6, 2005
- 1,495
- 235
- Thread starter
- #41
Personally...I think he's a bit too white.
Hudd probabaly thinks you are a bit too blue, or mauvey, or something. You've been sorely missed BM.
Personally...I think he's a bit too white.
He had an excellent game yesterday and is steadily improving.
No reason why the England side cant be built around him because he undoubtedly can become that good but still has a long way to go and has many areas of his game to improve.
He's certainly heading in the right direction.
You are having a laugh.
Hudd is a good replacement for Carrick. He has more potential because he could score, but he's nowhere near the sort of rigour required of big teams.
As most ppl on this site realize - Hudd is useless in tight games and the only reason he prevailed against Pompey is because they set back for 90 mins letting Hudd do what he does best.
What has age got to do with? At 21 he is a big assed man so stop pampering him. Ronaldo, Rooney, Lennon, Walcott, Bale and lmore who play in the EPL were already playing for their country when they were teenagers so the point about his age is a bit redundant, dont you think?
And its not doubting his potential, its about being realistic about his abilities and perfomances without putting him on that pedestial.
Not the cleverest argument I've ever seen you make Bullet. Leave aside the Huddlestone question for now, it's your logic which lets you down.What has age got to do with? At 21 he is a big assed man so stop pampering him. Ronaldo, Rooney, Lennon, Walcott, Bale and lmore who play in the EPL were already playing for their country when they were teenagers so the point about his age is a bit redundant, dont you think?
And its not doubting his potential, its about being realistic about his abilities and perfomances without putting him on that pedestial.
Not the cleverest argument I've ever seen you make Bullet. Leave aside the Huddlestone question for now, it's your logic which lets you down.
By your reasoning Singh or Faldo should have been written off in their early 20s because Tiger Woods was winning Majors at 21.
Kelly Holmes shouldn't have bothered with those Olympics because Carl Lewis was doing it before he was 25.
Federer should have quit because at the same age as Nadal was winning ATP tennis comps he was a callow, skinny guy getting swept aside by the other pros.
Anyway, I could go on but I won't. The point is some players in any sport develop faster than others, it's where they end up which matters and the time to judge that is in the prime of their careers and not in the infancy.
Just looked up The Hudd's profile and it says he weights:
11st 2 lbs!!! :bs: