What's new

Interim Results

Hoowl

Dr wHo(owl)
Staff
Aug 18, 2005
6,527
267
Tottenham Hotspur PLC Interim Results for the six months ended 31 December 2008.

Full statement PDF

Date: 19th March 2009

TOTTENHAM HOTSPUR PLC

Interim Results for the Six Months Ended 31 December 2008

Summary

* Revenue increased to £54.9m (6 months ended 31 December 2007: £54.5m) with higher income from gate receipts, media and broadcasting, and sponsorship.

* Record profit from operations at £42.2m (31 December 2007: £1.8m) enhanced by player trading.

* Cash generation continues to be strong.

* Investment continued during the period with intangible assets
increasing by 53% to £106.8m (31 December 2007: £69.7m).

* Total assets increased by 65% to £291.7m (31 December 2007: £177.0m).

* Preliminary works starting next month for the new world class Training Centre on over 60 acres in Enfield.

* Submission of full planning application for the Northumberland
Development Project is due in the next few months.


Daniel Levy, Chairman of Tottenham Hotspur plc, said:

"We have benefited from having a robust business that is well financed and
has continued to be able to support investment in the First Team, whilst
progressing two major capital expenditure projects, the new Training
Centre and the Northumberland Development Project. We remain mindful of
the prevailing economic climate from which no one can consider themselves
immune."

Financial Results

I am pleased to announce another set of record financial results for the
six months ended 31 December 2008. In a period of global economic
recession this is a considerable achievement and we acknowledge that both the strength of our business and the fantastic loyalty shown by our
supporters have helped ensure that these results have not been materially
affected.

Revenue remains strong at £54.9m for the period (2007: £54.5m), with media and broadcasting revenues contributing £18.1m (2007: £17.8m), chiefly through the central FAPL TV rights deal.

Premier League gate receipts rose to £10.4m (2007: £9.5m) in the first six
months of the year and this can be attributed to the categories of the
matches falling within the period and the fact that every game continues
to be played to full or near capacity.

For the third successive season, we qualified for and progressed through
the group stages of the UEFA Cup and for the second year running, by the
turn of the year, we had reached the semi-finals of the League Cup,
ultimately reaching the final in March. Despite playing one less home Cup
game this period than at the same stage last season, gate receipts for cup
competitions show a small increase of £0.2m.

Sponsorship and corporate hospitality income rose by 7% for the first six
months of the year to £14.2m. However merchandising has fallen principally
as a result of sales in the six months to December 2007 being buoyed by
sales relating to the Club's 125th anniversary.

Operating expenses before amortisation of intangible assets have risen in
the period to £50.0m (2007: £44.6m). The main contributory factors behind
this increase are an increase in player related costs, further termination
and restructuring costs and the provision for foreign exchange losses,
caused by the weakening of sterling against the euro in the period. The
foreign exchange losses relate to future player transfer payments and are
as yet unrealised.

Amortisation of intangible assets has increased to £16.2m (2007: £12.4m)
as the Club continues to re-invest proceeds raised from the sales of
players in its playing squad.

Player trading shows a profit of £53.4m for the six months (2007: £4.3m).
During the 2008 summer transfer window, gains were made on the sales of a large number of registrations, including Dimitar Berbatov, Robbie Keane,
Steed Malbranque, Teemu Tainio, Pascal Chimbonda, Paul Robinson, Younes
Kaboul and Anthony Gardner.

After deducting net finance costs of £2.3m (2007: £1.8m), the Club made
record pre-tax profits for the six month period of £39.8m (2007: loss of
£0.03m) - however, it needs to be noted that the Club did not make the
player trading profits in a manner that was planned or welcomed, as they
arose, in the main, from the regrettable sale of certain key players.

Looking at the balance sheet the investment in the playing squad resulted
in intangible assets reaching over £100m for the first time in the Club's
history. The Directors believe that the market value of intangible assets
is considerably in excess of this book value. Additionally the club has
continued to acquire property around the stadium and as a result the
carrying value of property, plant and equipment is almost £88m. Total
assets now stand at £291.7m (2007: £177.0m). This sustained investment has taken a number of years and it is a credit to the Club that net debt at 31 December 2008, after this sustained period of investment, stood at only
£40.1m.

On the pitch

With so much talent in the squad the expectation was that we would start
the season well, but we had a poor start achieving 2 points from a
possible 24, the worst ever start in the Club's history.

Changes were made to the coaching staff - Harry Redknapp, Kevin Bond and Joe Jordan were appointed. We thank Damien Comolli, Juande Ramos, Marcos Alvarez and Gus Poyet for their contribution to the Club, which included the winning of silverware with the League Cup in February 2008.

Outside of this period, the January window saw the return of three
previous players and it reflects well on the Club that these players chose
to return to us.

The new management, the return of key former players and the further
investment made in January 2009 resulted in a renewed confidence at the
Club and we saw greatly improved performances on the pitch and a
concurrent move up the League table.

Decisions to make significant changes are always difficult and lack any
guarantee of success, but it is a fast moving business and the ability to
respond in times of uncertainty with clarity and determination is crucial
in ensuring we continue to move forward.

Off the pitch

We continue to move our capital projects forward. With regard to the new
training facility, we have spent the last year seeking to resolve a rights
of way application which was filed after we submitted a planning
application. We engaged with all interested parties and last month
successfully reached agreement for a right of way to be built outside the
perimeter of the new Training Centre. Preliminary works start next month.
Whilst this has cost us time, the reality is we have spent the time
looking at the build costs, which in the current environment have moved in
our favour.

With regard to the Northumberland Development Project - which incorporates plans for our new stadium - we have bought significant further land and now own the freehold interest in over 85% of the core site. This month
Haringey Council demonstrated strong support for the scheme and in
assisting in the process of acquiring and assembling the remaining site
properties. Having received an overwhelmingly positive response to the plans at our first public exhibition last November, we now move towards a second public consultation in April with further enhanced designs and proposals. The project has moved on significantly and we remain confident that we will be in a position to submit a full planning application in the
next few months.

Projects of this nature require a number of contracts and decisions to
come together over a period of years. We have almost completed piecing
together the site to the north of the proposed new stadium which is likely
to be the first stage of the development, and includes a significant
retail scheme. We are looking at a deal with a US based seat rights
partner to look at ways in which we can offer long term affordable deals to fans who want to commit to the new stadium and their seat position within that stadium at an early stage
. Two additional areas of focus are the procurement of a naming rights partner and the finalisation of the requirements for the site to the south of the proposed new stadium. The latter, combining important public space and housing, has the real
potential to both maximise value and provide a focal point for the project
and its community.

As we continue to assess the contributions to the scheme, we obtain more
clarity on the funding gap which will have to be financed. An equity issue
is one such possibility, particularly when debt markets are currently so
illiquid.

Finally I would like to thank Mervyn Davies, now Lord Davies, who had to
resign his post in January as a non-executive Director to take up his
position in Government. We thank Mervyn greatly for his experience and
guidance and wish him every success.

Summary and outlook

Our supporters have contributed not only to the financial strength of the
Club, but have also been unwavering in their loyalty during difficult
times. I hope that we can reward that loyalty and support with future
success, along with a recognition of the difficult financial times we are
experiencing and which are still ahead. The price freeze on season ticket
prices for next season and the offer to freeze prices for the 2010/11
season are examples of this and have been factored into our realistic
financial modelling going forward.

We have benefited from having a robust business that is well financed and
has continued to be able to support investment in the First Team, whilst
progressing two major capital expenditure projects, the new Training
Centre and the Northumberland Development Project.

We remain mindful of the prevailing economic climate from which no one can consider themselves immune.

Thank you to all those who have showed immense support to the Club.

D P Levy


Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements

For the six months ended 31 December 2008

* Basis of preparation

The Group's next annual consolidated financial statements, for the
year ending 30 June 2009, will be prepared in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards adopted for use in the EU
("IFRSs"). These condensed consolidated interim financial statements have
been prepared on the basis of the recognition and measurement requirements
of IFRSs that are effective (or available for early adoption) in those
annual consolidated financial statements. These requirements are still
subject to change and to additional interpretation.



The financial information presented in this interim statement does not
constitute full financial information within the meaning of Section 435 of
the Companies Act 2006. The financial information for the year ended 30
June 2008 has been extracted from the statutory accounts for the year then
ended which has been filed with the Registrar of Companies. The audit
report on these accounts was unqualified and did not contain any
statements under s237(2) or (3) of the Companies Act 1985.

The Board of Directors continually monitor the Group's exposure to a
range of risks and uncertainties, including the success of the First Team,
the development of the new stadium and the current economic downturn. The
Directors believe that these risks and uncertainties are mitigated by,
inter alia, the robust nature of our business with long-term fixed
revenues from the key business areas, notably the FAPL TV deal.

The Board of Directors have undertaken a recent thorough review of the
Company's budgets and forecasts and have produced detailed and realistic
cash flow projections. These cash flow projections, which when considered
in conjunction with the Group's forecast cash and available banking
facilities (some of which fall due for renewal later this year),
demonstrate that the Group will have sufficient working capital for the
foreseeable future. Consequently, the Directors believe that the Company
has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the
foreseeable future and the financial statements have been prepared on the
going concern basis.

Accounting policies

The following accounting policies have been identified by the Board as
being the most significant to the financial statements.

Revenue

Revenue represents income receivable from football and related commercial
activities, exclusive of VAT.

Gate receipts and other matchday revenue is recognised as the games are
played. Sponsorship and similar commercial income is recognised over the
duration of the respective contracts. The fixed element of broadcasting
revenues is recognised over the duration of the football season whilst
facility fees received for live coverage or highlights are taken when
earned. Merit awards are accounted for only when known at the end of the
football season.

Player costs

Remuneration of players is charged in accordance with the terms of the
applicable contractual agreements and any discretionary bonus when there
is a legal or contractual obligation.



Signing-on fees are charged evenly, as part of operating expenses, to the
income statement over the period of the player's contract. These fees are
paid over the period of the player's contract.

Loyalty fees are accrued, as part of operating expenses, to the income
statement over the period to which they relate.

Property, plant and equipment

Freehold land is not depreciated. Leasehold property is amortised over the
term of the lease. Other fixed assets are depreciated on a straight-line
basis at annual rates appropriate to their estimated useful lives as
follows:

Freehold properties 2% - 4%

Motor vehicles 20%

General plant and equipment 10% - 33%

The Group capitalise costs in relation to an asset when economic benefit
from the asset is considered probable. Assets under the course of
construction are carried at cost and include professional fees.
Depreciation commences when the assets are ready for their intended use.

Land and buildings that are currently held for the Northumberland
Development Project are included within Assets Under Construction. In the
event that the proposed Northumberland Development does not proceed, £8.1m
of professional fees capitalised would need to be written off.

Intangible fixed assets

The costs associated with the acquisition of players and key football
management staff registrations are capitalised as intangible fixed assets,
at the fair value at the date of the acquisition.

The acquisition costs are fully amortised over their useful economic
lives, in equal annual instalments over the period of the respective
contracts. Where a contract life is renegotiated the unamortised costs,
together with the new costs relating to the contract extension, are
amortised over the term of the new contract. Provision is made for any
impairment of the carrying value of the playing squad should the carrying
value of the squad as a whole exceed the amount recoverable from the squad
as a whole through use or sale.

Where a player is not considered to be part of the playing squad a
provision for impairment would be made if the individual player's carrying
value exceeds the amount recoverable through use or sale.

Under the conditions of certain transfer agreements, further fees will be
payable to the vendors in the event of the players concerned making a
certain number of First Team appearances or on the occurrence of certain
other specified future events. Liabilities in respect of these additional
transfers are accounted for, as provisions, when it becomes probable that
the number of appearances will be achieved or the specified future events
will occur.

Profits or losses on the disposal of these registrations represent the
consideration receivable, net of any transaction costs, less the
unamortised cost of the original registration.

Preference shares

Convertible Redeemable Preference Shares ("CRPS") are regarded as compound
instruments, consisting of a liability component and an equity component.
At the date of issue, the fair value of the liability component is
estimated using the prevailing market interest rate for similar
non-convertible debt. The difference between the proceeds of issue of the
CRPS and the fair value assigned to the liability component, representing
the embedded option to convert the liability into equity of the Group, is
included in equity.

Issue costs were apportioned between the liability and equity components
of the CRPS based on their relative carrying amounts at the date of issue.
The portion relating to the equity component is charged directly against
equity.

The finance expense on the liability component is calculated by applying
the prevailing market interest rate for similar non-convertible debt to
the liability component of the instrument. The difference between this
amount and the interest paid is added to the carrying amount of the
liability component.



These statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 19 March
2009, and are not audited.



These results were announced to the Stock Exchange on 19 March 2009 and
are being posted to all shareholders. Copies will be available to personal
callers at the registered office,

Bill Nicholson Way, 748 High Road, Tottenham, London N17 0AP.

2. Revenue analysis

Revenue, which is all derived from the Group's principal activity, is
analysed as follows:

Six months ended 31 Six months ended Year
December 2008 31 December 2007
ended 30

June

2008
£'000 £'000 £'000
Revenue comprises:
Gate receipts - Premier 10,362 9,540 18,274
League
Gate receipts - Cup 3,919 3,727 10,341
competitions
Media and broadcasting 18,099 17,767 40,329
Sponsorship and corporate 14,210 13,254 27,778
hospitality
Merchandising 4,806 6,570 9,723
Other 3,493 3,622 8,343
54,889 54,480 114,788

3. Profit on disposal of intangible assets

Six months ended Six months ended Year ended

31 December 2008 31 December 2007 30 June

2008
£'000 £'000 £'000
Proceeds 73,174 8,489 22,618
Net book value of disposals (19,762) (4,177) (6,256)
53,412 4,312 16,362

4. Taxation



A corporation tax charge of £12,248,000 has been accrued as at 31
December 2008 on the profit before tax of £39,828,000 - an effective tax
rate of 31%.





5. Earnings/(loss) per share

Earnings/(loss) per share has been calculated using the weighted average
number of shares in issue in each period.

Six months ended Six months Year ended
ended
31 December 2008 30 June
31 December
2007 2008
£'000 £'000 £'000
Earnings/(loss) for the purpose 27,580 (189) 969
of basic earnings per share being
net profit attributable to equity 1,323 - 993
holders of the company

Interest charge in respect of
CRPS
Diluted earnings/(loss) 28,903 (189) 1,962
Number Number Number
Weighted average number of 92,787,460 92,892,956 93,032,204
ordinary shares for the purposes
of basic earnings per share
CRPS 91,063,038 - 91,075,534
183,850,498 92,892,956 184,107,738
Basic earnings/(loss) per share 29.7p (0.2p) 1.0p
Diluted earnings/(loss) per share 15.7p (0.2p) 1.0p

There are no ordinary share options outstanding at period end (31 December
2007: nil). On conversion the fully diluted share capital at period end
would be 183,862,111 shares (31 December 2007: 183,968,490 shares).

In the period ended 31 December 2007 the CRPS were not dilutive as they
would have reduced loss per share.
 

Shanks

Kinda not anymore....
May 11, 2005
31,192
19,077
I take it, that it means we are in a good position financially then ;-)

Good work dood, thanks for putting it up fella.
 

MattyP

Advises to have a beer & sleep with prostitutes
May 14, 2007
14,041
2,980
It's an interesting read for bean counters like me :grin:

Maybe of more interest generally is the small update on the stadium proposal.
 

PT

North Stand behind Pat's goal.
Admin
May 21, 2004
25,468
2,408
I like the idea of buying a long term interest in the Club in whatever manner that might be.
 

louisg

Active Member
Jan 7, 2004
928
84
Can someone explain this if we are in such a good state finacially why are we 40.1million in debt?

thanks in advance
 

Hoowl

Dr wHo(owl)
Staff
Aug 18, 2005
6,527
267
I like the idea of buying a long term interest in the Club in whatever manner that might be.


It could be like the Millennium stadium where they offered guarenteed tickets in exchange for interest free loans.
 

MattyP

Advises to have a beer & sleep with prostitutes
May 14, 2007
14,041
2,980
Can someone explain this if we are in such a good state finacially why are we 40.1million in debt?

thanks in advance

Because the club are investing in the first team squad, the training ground and acquiring property around white hart lane in preparation of the stadium project.

Whilst we made significant profits on player trading, the payments we will receive will be phased rather than being paid in one lump sum.

Likewise, shirt and other sponsorship income will not all be received in one lump sum.

These are pretty strong financial results, but profit does not equal cashflow.

The best way to consider it is that the profit and loss tells a story over the last six or twelve months, the balance sheet (where the debt it shown) is a photo at one point in time.

Sorry if that sounds Accountancy 101, but that's the best way I've heard it explained to non accountants.
 

PT

North Stand behind Pat's goal.
Admin
May 21, 2004
25,468
2,408
And it is not an up do date picture - it is the last accounting period. So it doesn't take in to account our recent splurge in January, nor our early European and FA Cup run exits.
 

tRiKS

Ledley's No.1 fan
Jun 6, 2005
6,854
142
Because the club are investing in the first team squad, the training ground and acquiring property around white hart lane in preparation of the stadium project.

Whilst we made significant profits on player trading, the payments we will receive will be phased rather than being paid in one lump sum.

Likewise, shirt and other sponsorship income will not all be received in one lump sum.

These are pretty strong financial results, but profit does not equal cashflow.

The best way to consider it is that the profit and loss tells a story over the last six or twelve months, the balance sheet (where the debt it shown) is a photo at one point in time.

Sorry if that sounds Accountancy 101, but that's the best way I've heard it explained to non accountants.

in even greater laymans terms 40.1m cashflow debt is one of the best in world football. the massive rise in fixed assests and the over all club value compared to this cash flow debt is fantastic considering how much money we've given to our managers recently trying to chase down the CL teams.

Levy once again gets specific applause for how he manages THFC PLC.
 

Adam456

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2005
4,458
3,124
Correct - it's the assets picture that make these a very good set of results. Player trading explains the big profit and that was only going to be temporary from the £50m for Berbatov and Keane

To say that we'e only £40m in debt after having aquired all of the land we need for the new developments is quite rosy.

Only little sting in the tail is how to fund the new stadium. They're acknowledge that there's little appetite for lending at the moment and suggest an equity solution. However, there's a big difference between raising £15m (as they did in a rights issue a few years ago) to raising maybe £150m (scum borrowed about £145m I understand). That can only be done by issuing new shares but that might be de-stabilising
 

PT

North Stand behind Pat's goal.
Admin
May 21, 2004
25,468
2,408
What would a brick sponsoring scheme bring in?
 

MattyP

Advises to have a beer & sleep with prostitutes
May 14, 2007
14,041
2,980
Bricks. :shrug:

Oh, sorry, I get you.

Depends on the price they charge I would think.

Say for example they charge a tenner a brick.

I would have thought maybe 20,000 people would go for that (purely plucking a number out of thin air, but broadly the level of season ticket holders as a rough gauge). So that would only raise £200k, so a pretty small amount.

If it was greater, say £1,000 a brick would they get more than 200 people on board and generate more than £200k. Difficult to say, but given the poor demand for the Opus arguably not.

Either way, it's a drop in the ocean compared to say £100m for naming rights.
 

gibbs131

Banned
May 20, 2005
8,870
11
LONDON - TOTTENHAM plan to tap their fans and shareholders for the funds required to build a proposed new 60,000-seat stadium close to their existing home at White Hart Lane, the club indicated on Thursday. Despite reporting stagnant revenues for the last six months of last year, Spurs chairman Daniel Levy said he was confident the club was well-placed to proceed with its ambitious plans for a new stadium and training ground.
Levy said an application for planning permission for the new stadium and a related housing, retail and leisure development would be made in the 'next few months' while work on the 60-acre training ground, at Enfield on the outskirts of London, would start next month.
Spurs were able to record pre-tax profits of 39.8 million pounds for the period but that was only because of what Levy termed the 'regrettable' sale of key players, including Dimitar Berbatov and Robbie Keane, who has since returned to the club.
The impact of the economic downturn was reflected in a decline in income from merchandising, although overall revenue, at 54.9 million pounds, was up fractionally from the figure of 54.5 million for the last six months of 2007.
Levy said he was 'mindful' of the current economic environment, 'from which noone can consider themselves immune' but voiced confidence that Spurs could finance their plans.
The club has now acquired 85 per cent of the land required for the Northumberland Development Project, as the scheme to build the new stadium is known.
Levy admitted that the full cost of the proposed development was yet to be calculated but indicated that a proportion could be met through the advance sale of rights to seats in the new stadium and by the issue of new shares.
'We are looking at a deal with a US-based seat rights partner to look at ways in which we can offer long term affordable deals to fans who want to commit to the new stadium and their seat position within that stadium at an early stage,' Levy said.
He added that the credit crunch made it more likely that Spurs would seek to raise funds from shareholders rather than going to the banks, as north London rivals Arsenal did to meet the 400-million-pound cost of building their Emirates Stadium. -- AFP

http://www.straitstimes.com/Breaking+News/Sport/Story/STIStory_352269.html
 

DogsOfWar

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2005
2,303
3,644
Part of me wonders whether it is worth battening down the hatches for the next few years until the new training facility is built and extra funding is available for the stadium.

If we accept league finishes between 5th and 7th whilst competing seriously for the cups then there is probably no need for any huge investment in the playing staff and any that is necessary would be offset by outgoings.
All our excess turnover could then be poured into improving the club infrastructure without incurring huge debts for our re-building projects.

Although this sounds a bit defeatist we have to be realistic.
We haven't finished in the top four for over twenty years whilst picking up 2 league and 1 FA cups in that time frame so we certainly wouldn't be any worse off in footballing terms.
And once we've finished the building we will have a genuinely world class club in terms of facilities and be able to use the extra revenue to really push for the CL places with our club being a very attractive proposition on all fronts.

One step backward to take two forward as it were.
 

MattyP

Advises to have a beer & sleep with prostitutes
May 14, 2007
14,041
2,980
Thing is Dogs of War that Levy intimates that shareholders may be required to fund some of the stadium costs through a rights issue.

Given that ENIC is the majority shareholder, they would be most affected by a rights issue and would presumably underwrite it as well.

Would suggest to me that they see it that any contribution they need to make, they would expect to see the return in terms of the price any potential suitor would have to pay to buy the club off them.

Therefore I believe that, subject to naming rights for the stadium and "seat rights" (which sounds like a cross between club wembley and the west ham bond scheme to me), the operating cashflows wouldn't play a particularly significant part in financing the stadium development.
 

markiespurs

SC Supporter
Jul 9, 2008
11,899
15,576
Considering the cost of hireing the architects, buying up the required property and all the work already done in the planning of a new stadium, not to mention a public relations nightmare, could it be possible that funding has already been arranged or agreed, at least in principle for the new stadium.

Regarding the new training facilities, does anyone know how long it will take to build the new training ground?
 

DogsOfWar

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2005
2,303
3,644
Thing is Dogs of War that Levy intimates that shareholders may be required to fund some of the stadium costs through a rights issue.

Given that ENIC is the majority shareholder, they would be most affected by a rights issue and would presumably underwrite it as well.

Would suggest to me that they see it that any contribution they need to make, they would expect to see the return in terms of the price any potential suitor would have to pay to buy the club off them.

Therefore I believe that, subject to naming rights for the stadium and "seat rights" (which sounds like a cross between club wembley and the west ham bond scheme to me), the operating cashflows wouldn't play a particularly significant part in financing the stadium development.

That was pretty much how I read it but I don't really see the point.

We have the 14th highest revenues in world football whilst not a single player in the top 50 salaries so we must be rather profitable in terms of wage to turnover ratio.

I can understand why, as a business, we don't want to create large profits so the money has been re-invested in 'upgrading' the playing staff.
But why don't we just re-invest the money into the building projects over the next few seasons?
Looking at our starting eleven/squad we're only a couple of players away from a 5th-7th place team which would be easily funded by selling.
We have a young side with a decent academy so we should continue to be strong for around 5-10 years

My argument is, CL might get you an extra £20 million a year but then so will an extra 20,000 bums on seats if we have no debt burden on it. If I had a choice between finishing fourth and struggling in the next years CL competition or a brand new stadium I'd rather have the stadium, the extra capital it brings in, and then the players to get us fourth.
 

lishiyo

Still frustrated :(
Aug 24, 2008
2,368
1
we have the best wages to turnover ratio in the league (or at least did last season) so at least we're 'efficient' in that sense. i think success on the pitch will help increase our revenues after the stadium gets built (it'll be much easier to sell out if we have CL footy or at least are challenging, and we'd get better naming rights and sponsorship deals), so i'd like our money to be focused on improving our squad so long as it's wisely spent. we don't need to overhaul our entire squad this summer, just gradually integrate a few better players, hopefully at bargain prices. we don't want to become like newcastle - huge stadium but a mediocre team that isn't exactly filling the seats and has little chance of ever making top 4 within the next decade, with villa and man city on the rise; given a few years, we could be complaining about those two teams poaching our best players and preventing us from improving.
 
Top