- Nov 13, 2008
- 1,015
- 820
In hindsight, we should have held on to young Andros Townsend.
100%.
Why don't we just recall him from QPR...
In hindsight, we should have held on to young Andros Townsend.
Quite agree my friend...Defoe is shooting on site from outside the box, Bale is shooting on site from outside the box and Ade is getting no service whatever inside the boxOP is completely right imo.
We need to play with width. When we had modric and vdv we could go through the middle but we had electric pace on either side and that really opened up space for adebayor. The main reason ade has had such a terrible season for me is because the midfield doesnt supply him with anything anymore. If Bale plays in the middle we have no width and if teams close down his space then he becomes ineffective at times. If we go back to playing wingers and trying to get behind the full backs and allowing the likes of dembele, carroll, holtby, sig to play ahead of parker I think we will get the wins we need.
The way I see it we're not getting in behind the opposition back line enough. The risk you take with playing a high line, pressing up the pitch and keepin possession is that you're camped in their half and have little room to go on the break. This means the movement and level of passing from your attacking players has to be shit hot. It's what Barca do so well. On the downside you're susceptible to counters but smart, quick footed defenders and a sweeper keeper deals with that.
I don't think the wings are as much a problem as our lack of movement. Our midfielders are not technical enough and our forwards have poor movement. You might get away with having one of the above but both leaves us camped outside their box, passing backwards and sideways, not having enough space for the wingers to get behind the fullbacks and relying on shots from outside the box to test the keeper as we can't build up play and work the ball into their box.
Agree and good post. The problem is having to rely on Bale in the middle because of the waste of space that is our two strikers.Obviously another hugely disappointing performance today and what could turn out to be a very costly 3 points dropped. For me, Fulham were not spectacular at all and while they defended solidly, we rarely gave them anything to really think about.
There is a common theme which, in my opinion, is costing us big time and is consistent in all three of the games that we have lost recently. That theme is a lack of winger. Wing play is vital to our over all game and our pattern of play has been the same for a very long time. For the vast majority of the last 6 years, we have played with an out and out winger on one side and a guy cutting in on the other side. This changed for a while when we had both Bale and Lennon operating in the wide areas but we have had at least one wide man there for the vast majority of the time, basically for as long as Lennon has been in the first team (see also Simon Davies, Andy Reid etc).
What this gives us is width. The main advantage of this width is that it forces the opposition to 'seperate' in the middle of the park, they have to commit at least 1 midfielder and a full back to deal with our winger and full back combination, meaning there are gaps in which 1 of our CM's, our strikers and our opposite winger coming in from the other side can operate in, when in and around the opposition penalty area. This concept was key to our recent success and especially our success in the Champions League, where European teams aren't used to dealing with fast players willing to beat you on the outside.
So what happens when we don't play with width? As happened today, the game became congested. In the first half, while BAE and Sig did keep their width to a certain extent, we lacked pace. It was a difficult ask for BAE to operate as a LM as it isnt his natural game and Sig was non existent on the other side, mainly due to a lack of service and poor understanding with Naughton (neither of them can be blamed for that really as this was their first performance together).
In the second half, we had serious problems with penetration. Dempsey and Sig were too narrow. What this meant is that when Naugton especially got on the ball in the final third, the opposition penalty area was absolutely rammed with bodies, leaving no space for second balls to fall into. This, coupled with over hit crosses meant that we created very few chances.
The most threatening we looked all afternoon was when we moved Bale to right midfield. Finally we had some pace in the wide areas and were able to stretch Fulham a little. IMO the best move would have been to move Bale to LM and have Dempsey on the right hand side. However, it showed that when we injected some pace out wide (plus the introduction of the excellent Tom Carroll in the middle) and had someone who was willing to beat somebody on the outside. We looked threatening and forced the goalkeeper into making some saves.
In conclusion, if Lennon is injured for any more games, I think it is vital that Bale plays LW for every game that Lennon is not playing in, to give us the ability to stretch teams and open up pockets of space. Bale especially helps with this as most teams normally triple up on him in the wide areas. If Lennon is back then we can play Bale through the centre.
Without this width, we struggle and this isn't something new for us, we struggled last season when we had to play say Pienaar and Kranjcar wide, or Modric and Kranjcar wide. In hindsight, we should have held on to young Andros Townsend.
A real tough one to take today but it is vital that we get back to our shape and playing the way we know how to play. COYS
The way I see it we're not getting in behind the opposition back line enough. The risk you take with playing a high line, pressing up the pitch and keepin possession is that you're camped in their half and have little room to go on the break. This means the movement and level of passing from your attacking players has to be shit hot. It's what Barca do so well. On the downside you're susceptible to counters but smart, quick footed defenders and a sweeper keeper deals with that.
I don't think the wings are as much a problem as our lack of movement. Our midfielders are not technical enough and our forwards have poor movement. You might get away with having one of the above but both leaves us camped outside their box, passing backwards and sideways, not having enough space for the wingers to get behind the fullbacks and relying on shots from outside the box to test the keeper as we can't build up play and work the ball into their box.
Good OP. The last 3 or 4 games have been frustrating to watch...especially with that conjestion in the middle.
God bless him, Scott Parker was a hero last season but since his injury he's been so off his game its not funny. He constantly pivots with the ball in the middle of the park and then lays off a 2 yard pass which more often than not goes backwards, sideways or gets intercepted by the oposition. His defensive work hasn't quite been there either...Christ I miss Sandro.
The width is definately a factor too - I'd like us to go back to a Bale and Lennon blasting down the wings, Benny and Walker on the overlaps, Parker dropping back to help Vertonghan and Gallas/Dawson/Caulker, Dembele moving the ball around from the middle side to side with several outlets. I'd then have Siggs or Holtby moving around behind Ade creating space with some sexy movement.
I'm no expert but we're losing the game in the middle of the pitch. we can't seem to distribute the ball out effectively, ceratinly not forward and we're ending up with players forward but having no impact and short at the back and inviting the counter.
I'm sure AVB will use the break to perform in depth analysis on our last 2/3 games and ready the tactics and the players...just not sure I can stomach too much more slippage.
COYS...please.
agree, and i think the closest we have to a replacement at the moment is Tom Carroll though i have reservations as to whether he could perform at the necessary level on a consistent basis at the moment. But at the moment id rather he played in front of Moussa in a CM pair than Scott, if Moussa is the holding player in a two.No ones to blame for what I'm about to say. But Modric leaving has been a body blow to our midfield.
Clint, Gylfi and Holtby just dont make up for Luka's movement not to even mentioning his passing.
Dembele has not 'consistently' got close to Luka's passing game, but Dembele has more to come.
I wish I felt the same about Clint and Gylfi who for me are at the root of the resent struggle, just not good enough, often enough. I feel sorry for AVB it must be like being in a fist fight with one hand tide behind your back.
Holtby is young so I will pass.
Our big problem is our recent signings and it give me no pleasure in saying it, are woeful.
The way I see it we're not getting in behind the opposition back line enough. The risk you take with playing a high line, pressing up the pitch and keepin possession is that you're camped in their half and have little room to go on the break. This means the movement and level of passing from your attacking players has to be shit hot. It's what Barca do so well. On the downside you're susceptible to counters but smart, quick footed defenders and a sweeper keeper deals with that.
I don't think the wings are as much a problem as our lack of movement. Our midfielders are not technical enough and our forwards have poor movement. You might get away with having one of the above but both leaves us camped outside their box, passing backwards and sideways, not having enough space for the wingers to get behind the fullbacks and relying on shots from outside the box to test the keeper as we can't build up play and work the ball into their box.