- Jul 20, 2011
- 4,052
- 6,804
Son attempted almost 50% fewer shots than Kane in the PL last season, yet scored roughly 30% more goals. Who's the high volume shooter?I don't see this happening but would be a great signing. I think sometimes rather than seeing the position somebody has played its more useful to see the role they play in their team.
Maddison's position for Leicester has been as the 10 but his main role has been to be a really high volume shooter and a decent creative passer. Richarlison for Everton was more of a pressing maniac with decent dribbling and able to provide both a presence in the box and some threat in behind.
What we were already working with was:
Kane - Presence in the box, plus incredible creative passing
Son - High volume shooter, excellent in behind, decent creative passer, not much of a defensive role
Kulusevski - High work rate, high quality passing plus good finishing
I do think that Richarlison could replace Kane's presence in the box but you lose a lot in terms of creativity. Likewise Richarlison could replace Son's threat in behind add some defensive work rate but you lose the varied shot threat that Son brings.
Maddison for me would provide a really high quality balance to our options. If Kane were to be missing or rotated he'd allow us to replace some of his creativity and if Son were he gives us more varied threat in terms of shooting.
Its also worth noting that Conte refers to the job that Son and Kulusevski do as 'Wide 10s' as we preferably want the width to come from the wing backs.
No idea if Leicester would sell or what price they'd want but I don't buy into the idea that because Maddison has played most his minutes as a 10 he wouldn't fit with our squad.