- Jul 10, 2008
- 16,023
- 48,736
I remember reading a while ago about how once a player is taken out of a Poch team, They are made to look like average players. It's an interesting point that the last few games have really made me think of. You look at the Lallana's and Lamberts etc. Poch gives his teams such specific instructions, he works around their flaws and uses the team as a way of bringing out the best in an individual.
Hodson is the complete opposite of this. He tries to find a way of shoehorning as much talent as he can on to a pitch and hopes it works. There is no coherent plan or method of play. Just the hope that some of the players will have a great game. This really exposes the likes of Kane, Ali and Walker etc, who aren't bad players, but are just left to do it all themselves.
A great coach knows how to get the best out of what he is given. Italy, Iceland, wales etc have shown what a coherent tactical plan, team ethic, and players working for each other can do. England have none of that, just a coach telling players a single moment of brilliance is enough (we have star players after all remember). Which itself festers an arrogance we see all to often with England.
This is funny though - it seems the general opinion of Roy has gone from "oh he's tactically stifling the team, he's a defensive, he just needs to give the players more freedom to attack" to "we have no tactics, no plan, players didn't know what to do"
I prefer to go with the reason that our players aren't as good as they are hyped up to be. Our players suffer from coaching flaws at a young age that mean we never develop the instinctive ability to play off-the-cuff pass and move football, in the same way the Germans or French are able to do effortlessly. We also don't seem to ever produce intelligent number 10 types like a Ozil, Eriksen or Silva - the types of players needed if you are going to successfully pick the lock of bus parkers'.
I could go on but the blame does not all lie at Hodgson's door.
Last edited: