Malo Gusto

[taidgh]

I for one would love if Boehly and Co. were doing the same for us. It’s absolutely annoying since it’s at the benefit of Chelsea, but I am not ashamed to say I am Uber-envious.

I'm here to talk if you need a Lyft.

 

[Snarfalicious]

I'm here to talk if you need a Lyft.

I only have a Nokia 3310 so can’t download the app. What’s your rate?

 

[Timberwolf]

I for one would love if Boehly and Co. were doing the same for us. It’s absolutely annoying since it’s at the benefit of Chelsea, but I am not ashamed to say I am Uber-envious.

Not sure if overpaying for every shiny young player and putting them on 7 and 8 year deals when you already have an overstuffed squad is the best business plan tbh.

But it's Chelsea so it'll work out just fine. ****s.

 

[THFCSPURS19]

 

[tubbygold]

How nice of them, handing out friendly advice like that.

 

[Frank Blank]

Sounds like a breath of fresh air to me.

 

[chas vs dave]

That sounds like classic Aulas at work ?.

 

[chas vs dave]

Lol, the "strategic plan" of buying everyone.

Their strategic plan is to get into a position of strength by leveraging future spend. They then buy future talents. Right now all of this spend is being amortised over 7 years. Whilst it allows big spend now, it reduces your spend in the future. Also, if these players flop, it's going to be a nightmare to get them off the wage bill.

The strategy is fucked of they fail to compete.

 

[wrd]

So United are suggesting that he does not move with Gusto?

 

[Japhet]

Their strategic plan is to get into a position of strength by leveraging future spend. They then buy future talents. Right now all of this spend is being amortised over 7 years. Whilst it allows big spend now, it reduces your spend in the future. Also, if these players flop, it's going to be a nightmare to get them off the wage bill.

The strategy is fucked of they fail to compete.

PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEASE GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Nick-TopSpursMan]

 

[Daarkest]

Their strategic plan is to get into a position of strength by leveraging future spend. They then buy future talents. Right now all of this spend is being amortised over 7 years. Whilst it allows big spend now, it reduces your spend in the future. Also, if these players flop, it's going to be a nightmare to get them off the wage bill.

The strategy is fucked of they fail to compete.

Isn't anything above 5 years a Club option (from reports I've heard)? If that's the case when and if they have to sell one of the players on these ridiculous contracts can't they just not exercise the option to keep the cost down? (the opposite of Brighton with Trossard)

 

[SandroClegane]

So they raised their bid 10-20m in a day or two? Is Boehly fucking insane?

 

[taidgh]

So they raised their bid 10-20m in a day or two? Is Boehly fucking insane?

Yeah, I laughed at that as well. 'You don't accept our initial bid? Okay, we'll offer double then!'

 

[septicsac]

Yeah, I laughed at that as well. 'You don't accept our initial bid? Okay, we'll offer double then!'

The polar opposite to DL " You don't accept our initial bid? Okay, we'll offer 10% less, but we will pay in weekly installments of butter vouchers"

 

[chrissivad]

 

[chrissivad]

Contract until 2030

 

[Jamturk]

Contract until 2030

He thinks he's going to usurp Reece James, terrible move for his career.

 

[WorthATry]

He thinks he's going to usurp Reece James, terrible move for his career.

You don't need to usurp when the player you are battling it out with is perennially injured

 

[archiewasking]

You don't need to usurp when the player you are battling it out with is perennially injured

Sad but true. I do like James, quality player.