I think we're all guilty of only remembering one side of it though. Fans of all clubs say exactly the same thing, because when the decisions go your way you tend to just shrug and think, "yeah, a bit lucky". When the shoe's on the other foot you're incensed and it burns itself into your memory. Kaboul should have given away a pen the other day for instance, but we got away with it. I bet the Everton fans will remember that for longer than we do.
But more importantly, let's just stop blaming the players. That was a fucking good performance today and we can take a lot of positives from that when we face Chelsea, Arsenal, Liverpool and Man utd. That was without Adebayor as well.
Redknapp and Levy, get a fucking move on and bring in a striker with some physical presence though.
Maske2g's post is balls but kind of predictable.
You have to be the team that hurts so much from defeat that is doesn't want to lose again. Look at our prior reactions to being beat by City at home and Stoke away - that's us, nothing to do with today. A pointless cliche.
We have to be antagonists - perhaps there is something correct here but only insofar as officialdom of the Premier League is utterly in the thrall of teams that push the boundaries. Do you want us to punch, stamp or abuse the opposition? Just because we might get away with it and it'd give us an advantage?
Refs dont win or lose, you do - Refs this year are proving that they are often incapable of following matches and arbitrating properly, so either a) give them more support or b) drop those whose performance levels reach embarrassing depths. These arguments become so simplistic - if you are a team who is efficient enough to make one clear chance and score it and the ref wrongly rules you offside - why would an argument of defence be that you should have made 15 chances to prevent such an occurrence. If you make one good chance and it should stand, it should stand. Its a joke if we talk about margins being widened precisely because half the refs in this league are incompetent. We trust these officials to make the correct call and they've really let the whole league down this year, and we've borne a brunt of poor decisions.
What you call defeatist shit has also powered many coaches to move their teams forward after bad results. There's many ways to instill a winning mentality and obviously many players respond to the 'world is against us' approach.
First half we played like a tidy team missing its focal point, which is what we were. We changed it up and could have won it, it was obviously a peno but the referee lost control at certain points and it worked against us. Gordon Gekko bullshit isn't the way forward..
Blaming ref's is feeble. We were awful at Stoke in the first half. Failed to adjust tactically to the long ball and gave 2 shit goals.
We got 3 pts at Fulham, where they dominated the game, but we got away with the win thanks to a poor refs decision.
In 38 games, you get what you deserve.
3rd and win the FA cup would be a excellent season. I hope the disappointment in the way we lost this game doesn't effect the rest of our season.
Because all that particular crowd want to do, is come on here and berate anybody who doesn't like losing, or has an opinion, and immediately label that as knee jerk reaction.
I honestly don't know why they bother coming on.
That's a fair point mate and I totally agree, but I struggle to think of any real game changing decisions we have had go our way this season, the Everton one for example was at 2-0 to us. Struggling to think of others, but maybe that just adds more credence to your point.
There was a game where Walker hand-balled on the line in the last minute but the ref didn't give, which definitely gifted us two points. I forget who it was against.
That was Fulham
We won that game by two clear goals though so who's to say we still wouldn't have won the match?
It was 2-1 at the time, but I refer yo to my previous post
Edit: Which is in a different thread . We should have had a pen a minute before when Sidwell pushed Parker in the back, so it evened itself out.
It was 2-1 at the time, but I refer yo to my previous post
Edit: Which is in a different thread . We should have had a pen a minute before when Sidwell pushed Parker in the back, so it evened itself out.
Not sure why this post was aimed at me because I wasn't arguing that the decisions have evened themselves out.Walker fell on the ball, different to getting blatantly fair goals ruled out and corners given for no apparent reason and leading to goals.
We might have. They could argue that they would have gotten a third too with the momentum they would have had. It's a pointless argument because no one knows.I know it was 2-1 and we scored largely because they were going all out to scored and would not have been had they equalised, but the fact is we did score again and may well still have had they been awarded a penalty
For the record, wasn't the foul on Parker initial contact made outside the box?