- Oct 21, 2012
- 18,320
- 33,955
He must be causing a lot of unrest at the club, as for me, I would have kept him an impact player. I would have liked to have seen him AND Song come on yesterday against Newcastle. Crystal Palace show what you can do with 2 pacey widemen. He's probably only on about £20 a week as well... is their much between him and Nje from what we've seen so far?
Have you had some sort of Rip Van Winkel moment and woken to find yourself in Spurscommunity circa 2015?There's absolutely no need for one spurs community member to talk to another like that. None at all.
Song? He plays for ManCHe must be causing a lot of unrest at the club, as for me, I would have kept him an impact player. I would have liked to have seen him AND Song come on yesterday against Newcastle. Crystal Palace show what you can do with 2 pacey widemen. He's probably only on about £20 a week as well... is their much between him and Nje from what we've seen so far?
I'm just getting fed up of keyboard warriors. Disagree with people by all means but resorting to pathetic name calling and put downs is beyond childish and unesesary.Have you had some sort of Rip Van Winkel moment and woken to find yourself in Spurscommunity circa 2015?
That is not the spellchecker you are looking for. Move along.I'm just getting fed up of keyboard warriors. Disagree with people by all means but resorting to pathetic name calling and put downs is beyond childish and unesesary.
And runs fast.Doesn't matter if he's young and English. £8m is thievery by us if that's what they pay, because he's not done much in the last two years. Only reason he's looked at any higher than your 'bog standard' decent young British players like Wickham or Colback is because he plays for a bigger club and had a couple of good international games.
The planning permission was for the amendments, not the stadium. If they were declined another alteration would have had to have been submitted. Buildings the stadium wasn't in doubt. It was the latest additions.And for us.
MattSpur - mot sure you're replying to my Townsend comment! LOLThe planning permission was for the amendments, not the stadium. If they were declined another alteration would have had to have been submitted. Buildings the stadium wasn't in doubt. It was the latest additions.
I don't know why this keeps happening. Strange.MattSpur - mot sure you're replying to my Townsend comment! LOL