- Jul 6, 2012
- 8,196
- 17,270
Is he? Maybe he isn't being played where he 'should be strongest'
Maybe Conte is the only person that sees something different?
Is he? Maybe he isn't being played where he 'should be strongest'
Not true really, he's naturally an AMC, his second position is RWF. This season since Dybala has come in he has been constantly moved around the pitch, hes even played CF. His normal position this season tho has been LWF which until now he has hardly ever played in his life and is very uncomfortable in. Added to that, Dybala has been taking up the positions Zaniolo likes to operate in. Its completely comparable to Kulu.Not comparable. Kulusevski was played in every position over the field, on inconsistent basis.
Zaniolo is playing where he should be strongest. Roma are creating chances but no putting them away.
He hasn't been playing were he is strongest.Is he? Maybe he isn't being played where he 'should be strongest'
Looking at our bench yesterday one can see why we are brining in another attacker, but yeah, if we don't get a centre back this window then its sort of pointless.I swear if we spend money on an attacker but don’t sign a defender I’m going to be ******* fuming.
Only positive though is that we can switch to 3 5 2 if we get zan and porro in I guess.Looking at our bench yesterday one can see why we are brining in another attacker, but yeah, if we don't get a centre back this window then its sort of pointless.
Looking at our bench yesterday one can see why we are brining in another attacker, but yeah, if we don't get a centre back this window then its sort of pointless.
Looking at our bench yesterday one can see why we are brining in another attacker, but yeah, if we don't get a centre back this window then its sort of pointless.
In fairness, we need all of RW/CAM, 2 CBs, RWB and keeper. At least it's not a player like Trossard that we don't need right now. Our bench has also been appalling at points this season so Zaniolo would definitely strengthen us. If we can get him on loan with an option then that's a perfect deal for us, and allows us to chuck money at the defence.I swear if we spend money on an attacker but don’t sign a defender I’m going to be ******* fuming.
Would love to now why this wasn't achievable earlier in the window.As I said yesterday, this really is a deal I can see happening. Zaniolo is very keen to join and play under Conte.
Why. We've been negotiating probably since Conte took over.It seems we are the only club really interested as well. Be nice if we could get it done this weekend but realistically it’ll probably take all week
I think that would help Persic as well. People lay into him but keep forgetting he's not a defender, hes a converted winger. Not that it excuses his awful performance yesterday. But switching to 352 would help him i think. Although we would still need a LCB. Really tho, considering his contract situation, there is no excuse not to bring in Ndicka as well as Zaniolo and Porro.Only positive though is that we can switch to 3 5 2 if we get zan and porro in I guess.
That would sure us up a fair bit
I swear if we spend money on an attacker but don’t sign a defender I’m going to be ******* fuming.
Because the later we leave it the more desperate Roma might get and more willing to do it for a price Levy likes. I agree tho, should been done by Fulham.Why. We've been negotiating probably since Conte took over.
Should have been done already. Not aimed at you, but I'm totally fed up with the excuses being churned out.Because the later we leave it the more desperate Roma might get and more willing to do it for a price Levy likes. I agree tho, should been done by Fulham.