- Aug 25, 2011
- 443
- 1,379
What's the purpose of this question? Just for clarificationIf you had a choice between him and Maddison? If both were available of course.
What's the purpose of this question? Just for clarificationIf you had a choice between him and Maddison? If both were available of course.
BOTH..If you had a choice between him and Maddison? If both were available of course.
Yeah mate, we're all well fucked on here. You still have time to join another normal forum who talk sense, you'll not get that here chief.So I'm quite new here......does it always go this mad over something that hasn't happened yet!? It's not like the ITK os even we have made an offer. It's just talks. And we also all know how paratici likes to have 3 or 4 options pretty progressed before he picks?
Just to gauge the consensus, we have been linked to both and surely it is one or the other?What's the purpose of this question? Just for clarification
That would be the greatest pump-fake ever if it was ?Does this fit in with what Rob said 2/3 weeks ago about being excited with AM options with some players we wouldn’t have thought would be possible a year or 2 ago (pre ACL injuries) ?
Cost being equal the obvious answer is Maddison.If you had a choice between him and Maddison? If both were available of course.
If it's a loan with an option then money wouldn't be so much of an issue.Cost being equal the obvious answer is Maddison.
But that's not how this works. Can't answer that question without knowing the cost.
Exactly this! Just as long as it’s a loan with option or swap with Tangy + cash or a very well priced flat out deal, purely a big transfer fee is probably a bit too big of a risk when/if we could spend a similar amount on a Pacqueta or Maddison etcZabiolo has the potential to be world class. If it weren't for his injuries, he'd be well beyond our ability to sign.
It's a gamble with his ACLs, but I'd go for it all day.
Depends on the cost, same cost then Maddison all day long but if Zaniolo hit his form pre ACL and continued to develop then he could be an absolute megastar even better than Maddison.If you had a choice between him and Maddison? If both were available of course.
Good point and could well do. A few years ago he was the next Totti and being linked with all the very very top clubs and we’d have not stood a chance in hell.Does this fit in with what Rob said 2/3 weeks ago about being excited with AM options with some players we wouldn’t have thought would be possible a year or 2 ago (pre ACL injuries) ?
I’m not sure I’d classify Palace or Wolves as anti-football. They both play very attractively.I admit I’m terrified of the likes of Bournemouth, Wolves, Palace, and West Ham next year. The orc-like anti football sides languishing in the relegation spots. The thing is, they should be a guaranteed 3 points but we’ve struggled to break teams down under Conte and it’ll only get tougher next season.
I hope this new fangled set piece specialist is a genius because without those X factor sort of goals, I have a feeling we’ll be coming away frustrated in a lot of those matches. We’ve made fun of Arsenal for signing light weight fancy-foot fairies, but the truth is all PL matches count for the same 3 points, and we need some playmaking in the side. I’m not confident in our ability to pass through low blocks and none of our wingbacks are good crossers, bar Perisic. Conte has his work cut out for him this year. Zaniolo is a beastly ball progressor and runner into space on the counter, put 2 or 3 defenders in front of him though and it’s a much different story.
I’m probably in a similar boat ? tbh, if he was our only AM signing it would be a tad underwhelming purely because it’s a bit of a risk compared to say a Maddison, if we got both then happy days.I’m not surprised if so, I must say I’m still hoping we don’t go through with it. There is a part of me that would be genuinely curious to see what Conte could do with him. But I guess I was really hoping to see us make one attacking addition that would really push for a starting spot in our best line up. And as we don’t really have a creative midfielder, then it would be an obvious pick to bring in some real quality in that position.
Don’t be silly, people don’t base their opinion on anything helpful like actual statistics.He played 42 games last year and contributed 17 goals / assists. I was expecting fewer games given the commentary on here
Yep only missed 4 games in Serie A all season with injury, each time a single game for a minor issue. He’s not injury prone he’s just had a twin ACL rupture in the past so has been our for a long time with that but nothing based on last season to say he’s particularly injury prone, it’s more a question of can he find more consistency and can he find his pre ACL form, if so he’d be a phenomenal signing.He played 42 games last year and contributed 17 goals / assists. I was expecting fewer games given the commentary on here
Zabiolo has the potential to be world class. If it weren't for his injuries, he'd be well beyond our ability to sign.
It's a gamble with his ACLs, but I'd go for it all day.
I feel a lot better about this signing now.He’s not injury prone he’s just had a twin ACL rupture in the past
Or a team of Lego menAs opposed to Arsenal who are building a team of midgets
Yep only missed 4 games in Serie A all season with injury, each time a single game for a minor issue. He’s not injury prone he’s just had a twin ACL rupture in the past so has been our for a long time with that but nothing based on last season to say he’s particularly injury prone, it’s more a question of can he find more consistency and can he find his pre ACL form, if so he’d be a phenomenal signing.
Well the good news is that he is plumb out of ACL’s to injure.I feel a lot better about this signing now.