Nuno comments on players after Crystal Palace defeat
- Thread starter mawspurs
- Start date
TheHoddleWaddle
Well-Known Member
- Dec 13, 2013
- 11,388
- 20,424
And he forgot to add, quality....
I sort of feel for him a bit as whilst it was a popular point of discussion, as to why Tanguy wasn't on the pitch, there isn't much alternative to add creativity. He hasn't featured and Nuno has to make his point about players only getting in the squad who are committed to the cause. I can see sense here, otherwise it's rhe wrong message in the long term.
With son out, you can't play Kane as a 'quarterback' either. Unless you go for Scarlett upfront. (Even that would have been preferable for me, at least it might have been more fun to watch).
Added to the issues with no LoCelso, he has very limited options to change it up as it currently stands.
We have yet to see the best team on the pitch.
I sort of feel for him a bit as whilst it was a popular point of discussion, as to why Tanguy wasn't on the pitch, there isn't much alternative to add creativity. He hasn't featured and Nuno has to make his point about players only getting in the squad who are committed to the cause. I can see sense here, otherwise it's rhe wrong message in the long term.
With son out, you can't play Kane as a 'quarterback' either. Unless you go for Scarlett upfront. (Even that would have been preferable for me, at least it might have been more fun to watch).
Added to the issues with no LoCelso, he has very limited options to change it up as it currently stands.
We have yet to see the best team on the pitch.
Similar threads
