I'd say 1 and 3/4s have worked outI was ready to die on the hill saying that Lo Celso and Ndombele would come good but I gave up shortly before they were loaned out.
It's crazy how badly we spend money, how many of our top 10 signings by fee paid have even worked out?
# player Age Nat. Season Left Fee 1
Tanguy Ndombélé Central Midfield 22 19/20 £54.00m 2
Davinson Sánchez Centre-Back 21 17/18 £37.80m 3
Moussa Sissoko Central Midfield 27 16/17 £31.50m 4
Giovani Lo Celso Central Midfield 24 20/21 £28.80m 5
Steven Bergwijn Left Winger 22 19/20 £27.00m 6
Roberto Soldado Centre-Forward 28 13/14 £27.00m 7
Sergio Reguilón Left-Back 23 20/21 £27.00m 8
Erik Lamela Right Winger 21 13/14 £27.00m 9
Heung-min Son Left Winger 23 15/16 £27.00m 10
Lucas Moura Right Winger 25 17/18 £25.56m
One could actually cross and pass the ball, take free kicks and corners, and function as a central playmaker.Hate comparing Lamela to Lo Celso. One gave their all whenever fit/able, the other really gave us nothing.
Argentinian Harry WinksGLC has missed a total of 45 games since he has arrived at spurs through injury.
Added to this he has a record of 1 goal and 3 assists in 55 games in the premier league.
Comparing to some random players...
Serge aurier - 77 games, 12 assists, 5 goals.
But he's an attacking full back I hear you say.
Ok stat of the day, Ben Davies has a better goal and assist ratio per game than GLC in the premier league.
Take the money and run. I would even argue that he has been a bigger flop than Tanguy.
This season he has been 'ok' for Villarreal. If they spend anywhere near 20m we have got incredibly lucky.
View attachment 112659
In fact apart from one season with Betis where he scored 8 goals, he has done next to nothing in his club career.
To this day I'm not really sure what type of player he is. He is not a goalscorer, he doesn't make assists and he is not a defensive player.
The argument could be made to say he is a player that sets the tempo and pass before the pass player. A Silva or Modric type player, but he has never been anywhere near those players levels.
From memory he had a few promising games under José and he is certainly decent for Argentina, but for what we spent on him it is nothing short of an absolute waste of money.
Bergwijn, lo Celso and ndombele our three biggest signings pre paratici and they all could be argued for worst signing of the century so far. All three have had injury/fitness problems, all three have failed to settle and all three will probably go this year.
There is talent in all three players but none of them have adapted to the premier league. Talk about bad scouting. What is it 100m on those three players? And if we recoup half of that we will have done well.
Winks never had the talent, though. Maybe he showed promise but his core competencies were basically being a busy **** and providing sensible, if not expansive, passing. He was essentially a water carrier even at his 'peak' level of play.Argentinian Harry Winks
I was ready to die on the hill saying that Lo Celso and Ndombele would come good but I gave up shortly before they were loaned out.
It's crazy how badly we spend money, how many of our top 10 signings by fee paid have even worked out?
# player Age Nat. Season Left Fee 1
Tanguy Ndombélé Central Midfield 22 19/20 £54.00m 2
Davinson Sánchez Centre-Back 21 17/18 £37.80m 3
Moussa Sissoko Central Midfield 27 16/17 £31.50m 4
Giovani Lo Celso Central Midfield 24 20/21 £28.80m 5
Steven Bergwijn Left Winger 22 19/20 £27.00m 6
Roberto Soldado Centre-Forward 28 13/14 £27.00m 7
Sergio Reguilón Left-Back 23 20/21 £27.00m 8
Erik Lamela Right Winger 21 13/14 £27.00m 9
Heung-min Son Left Winger 23 15/16 £27.00m 10
Lucas Moura Right Winger 25 17/18 £25.56m
I think he was bought with an expectation, at least from fans, that he is a passer who knits play up. But hes not that and never has been. He is more of a ball carrier who is able to hold the ball and drive it forward. I actually think part of the problem was buying him and ndombele together when they basically serve a similar role and I don't think its possible to have a functioning midfield with both of them in it. At least Lo Celso has a bit of grift in him. Hasn't worked for sureGLC has missed a total of 45 games since he has arrived at spurs through injury.
Added to this he has a record of 1 goal and 3 assists in 55 games in the premier league.
Comparing to some random players...
Serge aurier - 77 games, 12 assists, 5 goals.
But he's an attacking full back I hear you say.
Ok stat of the day, Ben Davies has a better goal and assist ratio per game than GLC in the premier league.
Take the money and run. I would even argue that he has been a bigger flop than Tanguy.
This season he has been 'ok' for Villarreal. If they spend anywhere near 20m we have got incredibly lucky.
View attachment 112659
In fact apart from one season with Betis where he scored 8 goals, he has done next to nothing in his club career.
To this day I'm not really sure what type of player he is. He is not a goalscorer, he doesn't make assists and he is not a defensive player.
The argument could be made to say he is a player that sets the tempo and pass before the pass player. A Silva or Modric type player, but he has never been anywhere near those players levels.
From memory he had a few promising games under José and he is certainly decent for Argentina, but for what we spent on him it is nothing short of an absolute waste of money.
Bergwijn, lo Celso and ndombele our three biggest signings pre paratici and they all could be argued for worst signing of the century so far. All three have had injury/fitness problems, all three have failed to settle and all three will probably go this year.
There is talent in all three players but none of them have adapted to the premier league. Talk about bad scouting. What is it 100m on those three players? And if we recoup half of that we will have done well.
Lets be honest from 25milion now you couldn't buy an attacking player to warm your bench. Our biggest transfers are skewed because we just haven't made that many deals recently and player inflation is huge. Granit Xhaka would be our second highest all time transfer on that list! (Arsenals 7th). To put it in comparison Sissoko would be Arsenals 11th highest all time transfer. I'm using Arsenal because they are in an economically similar position to us. Richer teams have even more extreme results. For united Sissoko would be their 23rd highest transfer with Lindelof and Schneiderlin. Both bought around the same time.Son obviously, but Moura, Sanchez, Lamela and Sissoko all played big roles in our most successful side in living memory.
I accept that none of those four (with the exception of possibly Moura) has quite lived up to the transfer fee, but they’re absolutely not flops in the Ndombele/Soldado category.
Tottenham have received offers for LoCelso from Atletico Madrid, Seville & Villareal
whoever this guy is seems to throw a lot of shit and see how much of it sticks.
Bidding war sounds great.Ideally we need a bidding war on Lo Celso. Even if just to gain more leverage over Villarreal on a possible move for Torres.
Think Poch had marked him for either the AM at the peak of his diamond formation or on the right or left of the centre of the diamond.He was excellent at Betis and the signing made sense on paper but he joined at the wrong time and apart from a brief good spell under Jose he was very disappointing.
In hindsight his game isn't suited to this league (no shame in that).
Lamela cared about the club, and the fans cared about him.Hate comparing Lamela to Lo Celso. One gave their all whenever fit/able, the other really gave us nothing.