- Aug 20, 2013
- 2,073
- 2,210
They'll be pro Manchester mate. And be fair the article is bloody awful.The Manchester Evening News is known for being absurdly pro-City, and generally anti-United.
They'll be pro Manchester mate. And be fair the article is bloody awful.The Manchester Evening News is known for being absurdly pro-City, and generally anti-United.
If, somehow, Toby doesn’t leave by Thursday, does anybody seriously think the club and Toby won’t come to some mutually beneficial arrangements? He’s a world class centre back, and one of the highest output employees in our multi million pound organisation. He also isn’t getting any younger, any less injured or any more appealing, he’s at his peak. 100% if we don’t sell him we will find a compromise with him whereby we derive some use from him, and him from us, for the next 12 months until that clause is triggered.
Today's article from the MEN is utterly damning on Levy, and entirely justified.
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/toby-alderweireld-man-utd-transfer-14993381
They'll be pro Manchester mate. And be fair the article is bloody awful.
In the same way that the Evening Standard is "pro-London"? What nonsense.
As someone who lives in Manchester, has worked with Manchester United, and has mates at the MEN, United and City, I have a reasonable understanding of the local politics and allegiances, and I can assure you that the MEN is essentially Guardiola's propaganda rag.
I agree.Why would they take sides for Spurs and against United potentially angering and alienating a good proportion of their readers?
In the same way that the Evening Standard is "pro-London"? What nonsense.
As someone who lives in Manchester, has worked with Manchester United, and has mates at the MEN, United and City, I have a reasonable understanding of the local politics and allegiances, and I can assure you that the MEN is essentially Guardiola's propaganda rag.
Londons a different beast. Loads of Man U, Liverpool, Celtic, Rangers, Newcastle etc etc. They sell their papers.In the same way that the Evening Standard is "pro-London"? What nonsense.
As someone who lives in Manchester, has worked with Manchester United, and has mates at the MEN, United and City, I have a reasonable understanding of the local politics and allegiances, and I can assure you that the MEN is essentially Guardiola's propaganda rag.
Why would they take sides for Spurs and against United potentially angering and alienating a good proportion of their readers?
Not commenting on the larger Manchester political paper scene, Samuel Luckhurst the writer of this specific article has at least for this summer been very focused on positive Man United content. What he produces for MEN is pro ManU content.In the same way that the Evening Standard is "pro-London"? What nonsense.
As someone who lives in Manchester, has worked with Manchester United, and has mates at the MEN, United and City, I have a reasonable understanding of the local politics and allegiances, and I can assure you that the MEN is essentially Guardiola's propaganda rag.
That may be true but it's abundantly clear from his twitter page that Luckhurst is a Utd fan.
He also posted this nugget a couple of days ago. Admits Utd had little interest in other links and yet it's us that have had our bluff called, and the price is potentially higher than what they offered in May, perfect logic.
Wrote in February#mufc wanted Alderweireld and they tried to do an early deal for £55m in May. They’ve been linked with so many centre halves since but ‘interest’ in majority was non-existent. Was bound to drag out with Levy but Spurs’ woeful window has helped United.
Londons a different beast. Loads of Man U, Liverpool, Celtic, Rangers, Newcastle etc etc. They sell their papers.
If you think MEN is going to support a London Clubs perspective, I think the nonsense will have to be judged by others.
Today's article from the MEN is utterly damning on Levy, and entirely justified.
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/toby-alderweireld-man-utd-transfer-14993381
Today's article from the MEN is utterly damning on Levy, and entirely justified.
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/toby-alderweireld-man-utd-transfer-14993381
Maybe dude. You live there, I'll have to take your word for that (more moving there). Never thought it was a grey place personally...when I've visited.No, London is not a different beast. I know most Londoners think Manchester is all terraced houses, greyhounds, blokes with long greasy hair and people with no teeth who can't talk properly, but surprisingly it has moved on slightly in the past 30 years.
Plenty of people here who support neither United or City, a number which is only going to increase now London has started losing more residents to Manchester than vice versa.
Yup click on his name at the top of the "article" and you get this:Not commenting on the larger Manchester political paper scene, Samuel Luckhurst the writer of this specific article has at least for this summer been very focused on positive Man United content. What he produces for MEN is pro ManU content.
In the same way that the Evening Standard is "pro-London"? What nonsense.
As someone who lives in Manchester, has worked with Manchester United, and has mates at the MEN, United and City, I have a reasonable understanding of the local politics and allegiances, and I can assure you that the MEN is essentially Guardiola's propaganda rag.
Noises getting louder about United and Boateng...
Sky Germany saying United have approached Bayern
http://www.skysports.com/transfer-centre