What's new

Premier League 2023/2024

jonnyp

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2006
7,261
9,814
Rather they spent time getting it right no?

There's no need to spend that much time "getting it right". They seemed to try and make up possible reasons to disallow it. The only thing in question with that goal was whether or not it was over the byline.
 

Tonio

Good bloke, thorough professional.
May 15, 2008
3,972
6,796
There's no need to spend that much time "getting it right". They seemed to try and make up possible reasons to disallow it.
There were 3 issue to be sorted and complications with each. You can not make a snap decision on that. Its VAR bashing for the sake of it.
 

DarwinSpur

Well-Known Member
Dec 30, 2020
6,019
10,625
That looked out to be. I'd be fuming if that was given against us. All this curve of the ball bollocks.

never even close to being out. World Cup all over again.

Thought it was a good Var check looking at multiple issues. If it was spurs I'd want the foul to be given as two hands and joelinton nowhere near the ball.
 

jonnyp

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2006
7,261
9,814
There were 3 issue to be sorted and complications with each. You can not make a snap decision on that. Its VAR bashing for the sake of it.
There was 1, the other 2 you could tell from the first replay they were nothing.
 

chilespurs

Active Member
Aug 2, 2010
117
142
It's the time they spend I was referring to obviously
VAr would be so much better with a 30 second limit. Have a timer if no decision comes from var then the refs decision is valid. would solve all problems, sure there would be some errors, but only those that can't be justified within the 30 second limit. Have a countdown in the stadium, it would add to the excitment instead of taking it away.
 
Top